Stalked and harassed by Graham Peck/A.K.A Rudolph Hucker

[Marco]

Ollie please do not demean or belittle the seriousness of what Peck has done, what I've had to endure from that scumbag for years, or how it has affected me, with references to boxing matches, etc, or we *will* fall out! This is not a laughing matter.

Also, I have removed what you've written about historical events, which if you were aware of (as you obviously are), then why ask what the history was before?? I can only presume you have some sort of an agenda. You don't know the full story and I'm not getting into it here.

Be warned though, that any attempting to rationalise Peck's appalling behaviour (as that's how it comes across) will result in you being out for a month. No way am I putting up with that shit. Any further references to past history [in this instance something that occurred over 10 years ago], which you're not qualified to comment on, will be removed without further notice and also attract the same outcome.

Marco.

[Bigman80]

Ollie please do not demean or belittle the seriousness of what Peck has done, what I've had to endure from him for years, or how it has affected me, with references to boxing matches, etc, or we *will* fall out! This is not a laughing matter.

Also, I have removed what you've written about historical events, which if you were aware of (as you obviously are), then why ask me what the history was?? I can only presume you have some sort of an agenda. You don't know the full story and I'm not getting into it here.

Be warned though, that any further sympathising towards Peck will result in you being out for a month. No way am I putting up with that shit. Any further references to past history, which you're not qualified to comment on, will be removed without further notice and attract the same outcome.

Marco.

Marco,

I'm not belittling anyone or anything, and am showing no sympathy toward anyone involved.

I don't know why you feel there is a need to "threaten" me with a "month out" either?

My intention had been to perhaps, enlighten you with the possible outcomes that you may be faced with if you chose to go ahead with your preferred option.

I have no affinity to anyone in this regard.

I'm not protecting anyone or inciting further reactions, just trying to offer a balanced perspective on the state of play from my informed perspective. Something many members here will not have.

I tell you what, I'll drop you a PM seeing as what I "know" seems to be unfit for forum consumption.

[Marco]

Marco,

I'm not belittling anyone or anything, and am showing no sympathy toward anyone involved.

That may not have been your intention, but that's not how it comes across. The fact is, *regardless* of what happened between Peck and me over 10, yes TEN years ago now, it does not entitle him to harass and vilify me ever since! No-one normal behaves like that.

I don't know why you feel there is a need to "threaten" me with a "month out" either?

Because I can't see any friendly or constructive reason why you would ask me what the history was, when you clearly *already* knew, and in such a way as to counter Grant's perfectly valid point beforehand about racist remarks aimed at my mother.

Do you see now how that could be construed as an attack? There is NO justifiable excuse for Peck's vile behaviour - end of, and anyone here who attempts to put one forward, will be seen as the enemy. Simples!

PM me what you like, but it won't make an iota of difference to what's happened here, so bear in mind what I've just said in future.

Marco.

[Bigman80]

That may not have been your intention, but that's not how it comes across. The fact is, *regardless* of what happened between Peck and me over 10 years ago now, it does not entitle him to harass and vilify me ever since!



Because I can't see any friendly or constructive reason why you would ask me what the history was, when you *already* knew, and in such a way as to counter Grant's perfectly valid point beforehand about racist remarks aimed at my mother.

Do you see how that could be construed as an attack? There is NO justifiable excuse for Peck's behaviour - end of, and anyone here who attempts to put one forward will be seen as the enemy. Simples!

PM me what you like, but it won't make an iota of difference to what's happened here, so bear in mind what I've just said in future.

Marco.

Tapatalk updated. Back in business.

Pm incoming.

[Marco]

Responded to

Marco.

[Bigman80]

Responded to

Marco.

[Marco]

Anyway, the interesting thing from the poll so far is no-one considers that Peck deserves a chance to redeem himself, before I go legal on his ass, AND more importantly, that 33% of you so far [and probably rather more besides] agree that he is a very disturbed nutter!

Therefore Peck, as I know you'll be reading this...embrace and accept the fact that people think you are A VERY DISTURBED NUTTER, or to put it more politely, they believe that you have mental health issues, so SEEK HELP!!!

Marco.