+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: Analogue tape versus vinyl

  1. #11
    Audio Al is offline Pishanto Specialist & Super-Daftee
    Join Date: May 2012

    Location: Dagenham Essex

    Posts: 11,215
    I'm Allen.

    Default

    I had to re read your first post as I thought the Decca won , But now see the R2R rules supreme

    ±±
    [

  2. #12
    Join Date: Jul 2010

    Location: Cheltenham

    Posts: 982
    I'm Charlie.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Edward View Post
    Assuming it is now out of copyright it would be wonderful if either the tape and/or the 45 RPM album could be digitised.

    I'm listening to the 2002 release via Tidal and although sounding ok I think a fair amount of compression has been applied. Listening to it how it was originally released would be cool.
    UK music copyright laws are 70 years after the death of the artist and master recordings 50 years after release.
    R2R: Studer A820 1/2 inch 2 track; Otari MTR-12 1/4 inch 2 track; Sony APR 5003; Sony APR 5002; Studer A807/II. Vinyl: Platine Verdier Allaerts MC1B/Schroeder Reference & Model 2 Decca C4E/Hadcock 228 TRON Seven Reference phono. Keith Monks MkII RCM Other analogue source: Nakamichi Dragon with ANT4066 mods. Amplification: TRON Meteor preamp TRON Voyager 20B SET power. Speakers: Avantgarde Duo. Digital: computing at last with Prism Sound Lyra 2 A2D converter

  3. #13
    Bigman80 Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by topoxforddoc View Post
    Speed and dynamics yes - but also the naturalness of the tonal balance. Some might say that the Decca sound dry, but it's job is to replicate the music.
    The deccas I tried sounded like they were trying to exhaust my tweeters.

    Glad you had better results.

  4. #14
    Join Date: Mar 2009

    Location: South West-ish, UK

    Posts: 457
    I'm Patrick.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigman80 View Post
    The deccas I tried sounded like they were trying to exhaust my tweeters.

    Glad you had better results.
    You didn't manage to get them set-up right then, or maybe they were knackered.

  5. #15
    Bigman80 Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Dixon View Post
    You didn't manage to get them set-up right then, or maybe they were knackered.
    What, both of them?

    Unlikely.

    I actually thought the blue was broken. Returned it to the owner and he said "No, it's meant to sound like that" lol.

    Sold the Decca Gold, it was worse than the Blue IMO.

    I also doubt setup was an issue either. I'm not exactly a novice at it.

    Just weren't my cup of tea.

  6. #16
    montesquieu Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigman80 View Post
    What, both of them?

    Unlikely.

    I actually thought the blue was broken. Returned it to the owner and he said "No, it's meant to sound like that" lol.

    Sold the Decca Gold, it was worse than the Blue IMO.

    I also doubt setup was an issue either. I'm not exactly a novice at it.

    Just weren't my cup of tea.

    Agree with you there ... I think it depends what you are listening to, they do have a very dynamic feel great with drums, and push the vocals out at you, but have never persuaded me they throw a convincing 3D soundstage, or present a coherent acoustic space or accurate timbre for more subtle kinds of music.

    Tried three times now with different TT/tonearm combinations - really not my thing at all.

  7. #17
    Bigman80 Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by montesquieu View Post
    Agree with you there ... I think it depends what you are listening to, they do have a very dynamic feel great with drums, and push the vocals out at you, but have never persuaded me they throw a convincing 3D soundstage, or present a coherent acoustic space or accurate timbre for more subtle kinds of music.

    Tried three times now with different TT/tonearm combinations - really not my thing at all.
    I tried on two different arms, two different turntables and on all combinations the bass extention just wasn't there.

    I'm not talking of richness or anything like that, I'm talking actual frequencies missing.

    At the time I had a AT33PTGII which wasnt a bass monster at all but it certainly did bettrr bass by a large margin.

    Just didn't like what it did it. Either of them and I gave it three tried and the last effort was a John Wright retipped version so was absolutely mint. Hand delivered and collected from Bridgenorth.

  8. #18
    Join Date: Jul 2010

    Location: Cheltenham

    Posts: 982
    I'm Charlie.

    Default

    Tom and Oliver,

    I'm sorry that you couldn't get on with Decca. They are very much a Marmite cartridge. But it was a very interesting comparison between the studio tape and the two cart set ups on the same TT with the AP Dusty 45 RPM LP. The studio tape was noticeably better in every way, but the Decca was definitely the better match for tonality, dynamics and accuracy.

    Charlie
    R2R: Studer A820 1/2 inch 2 track; Otari MTR-12 1/4 inch 2 track; Sony APR 5003; Sony APR 5002; Studer A807/II. Vinyl: Platine Verdier Allaerts MC1B/Schroeder Reference & Model 2 Decca C4E/Hadcock 228 TRON Seven Reference phono. Keith Monks MkII RCM Other analogue source: Nakamichi Dragon with ANT4066 mods. Amplification: TRON Meteor preamp TRON Voyager 20B SET power. Speakers: Avantgarde Duo. Digital: computing at last with Prism Sound Lyra 2 A2D converter

  9. #19
    montesquieu Guest

    Default

    I've always enjoyed hearing tape machines where people have brought them to shows but it's a rabbit hole I refuse to jump down, partly because of the hassle factor of getting and fettling and maintaining a tape machine (or two if you are going to make backup copies, as indeed you really must), but the sheer cost of buying the software and the relative lack of availability of most titles. My listening is somewhat specialised and I doubt whether any of my favourite renaissance, baroque, chamber music or Lieder repertory is available on tape, and I'm pretty sure no-one put out a Bach cantata cycle!

    I do have some experience with tape machines, having played with 2-inch 16 track machine when I was a music student, in the university's grandly-named 'electronic music studio' (laying down synthesiser tracks one at a time after setting the sounds up with a patch board, or recording small ensembles), and mixing that down to two tracks. But all the dubbing, splicing, rewinding etc that goes with tape has minimal appeal to me compared to putting on an LP, whatever the notional sonic benefits. It's also quite a fragile medium even compared to vinyl.

  10. #20
    Join Date: Mar 2009

    Location: South West-ish, UK

    Posts: 457
    I'm Patrick.

    Default

    Well, you should come and listen to mine then - no missing bass for sure! I've had an AT33PTG as well, and it was very thin by comparison.

    I've heard Charlie's Decca (briefly) too, and there was nothing wrong with that either!

    I think if you haven't heard one work properly, and you think you are 'not a novice at setup', it's easy to give up when it doesn't sound right. Obviously, you just don't know what you are missing! The first one I had sounded horrible, but the dynamics were amazing so I persevered.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •