+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Dispersion Foam Used Around Royd Minstrel Tweeters?

  1. #1
    Join Date: Apr 2017

    Location: Cheshire UK

    Posts: 843
    I'm Martin.

    Default Dispersion Foam Used Around Royd Minstrel Tweeters?

    Hi

    Im thinking of a full veneering project for some Minstrel cabinets. I will keep mine as is and bring in some tatty cabinets to be refurbished before swapping out drivers and crossovers

    I dont think I can shave off the original foam cleanly or even whether it will be in good enough cosmetic condition to save

    I will therefore want to get some of the dispersion foam Joe Ackroyd used around the vifa tweeters.

    Its about 2mm thick and grey coloured with a smoothish surface. Ive been looking at sheet foam PVC... EVA? but havent a clue.

    I havent asked people such as Wilmslow audio yet( nothing on the web page) so I will badger you folks until someone has the answer

    I would like to get them looking as near original as I can. I really wish Joe Ackroyd was still with us cos he would be making some amazing speakers now and could tell me what that foam is made from

    Cheers
    Martin

  2. #2
    Join Date: Apr 2011

    Location: cheltenham

    Posts: 746
    I'm matt.

    Default

    I've never really thought about it until now but that stuff is too thin to have much, if any affect on the sound, and the small step it creates can only make things worse.

    Would love to know the reason why Joe put it there. Looks? Or to hide access to the crossover/ modified tweeter? (crossover is actually behind the tweeter). The tweeter is a modified Vifa 19 with a cardboard tube glued to the back to create a bigger rear chamber.

    If it were me, i'd carefully remove the foam and not worry about it.

  3. #3
    Join Date: Apr 2017

    Location: Cheshire UK

    Posts: 843
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fatmarley View Post
    I've never really thought about it until now but that stuff is too thin to have much, if any affect on the sound, and the small step it creates can only make things worse.

    Would love to know the reason why Joe put it there. Looks? Or to hide access to the crossover/ modified tweeter? (crossover is actually behind the tweeter). The tweeter is a modified Vifa 19 with a cardboard tube glued to the back to create a bigger rear chamber.

    If it were me, i'd carefully remove the foam and not worry about it.
    Thanks..... yes I was thinking along those lines but dare not say it. Im not sure what actual effect it could have but it does make the speaker look more boffiny

    I am going to be putting a nice real oak veneer on them. As you say I will probably leave the foam off and find some fancy allen bolt or screw heads to enhance the looks.

    Yes the speakers are not anywhere near the last word in sound...I realise that but its a project I would like to do....one day ie it may never happen

  4. #4
    Join Date: Jun 2015

    Location: London/Durham

    Posts: 6,878
    I'm Lawrence.

    Default

    I always assumed it would stop the treble traveling along the cabinet and diffracting on the cabinet corners causing smearing of the image.

    Sent from my BLN-L21 using Tapatalk

  5. #5
    Join Date: Apr 2017

    Location: Cheshire UK

    Posts: 843
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lawrence001 View Post
    I always assumed it would stop the treble traveling along the cabinet and diffracting on the cabinet corners causing smearing of the image.

    Sent from my BLN-L21 using Tapatalk
    yeah I dont think he would have stuck it on for no real reason. I will probably get some of those foam pieces if I can find it. I will have to cut nice circles so its all extra work to be done properly.

    What I dont understand then is why you dont really see it on other speaker designs if it is important

  6. #6
    Join Date: Jun 2015

    Location: London/Durham

    Posts: 6,878
    I'm Lawrence.

    Default

    A few do, LS3/5As for example. It can deaden the sound a little, a bit like excess wadding in a speaker or stiffening a lossy cabinet. Or more similarly, absorbing the rear radiation from a dipole tweeter. I guess you need to tune the treble level to account for the expected dispersion when designing a speaker, so adding it to a speaker voiced "in room" without it can make them sound dull. I'd try them without for a while and see if you prefer the sound.

    Sent from my BLN-L21 using Tapatalk

  7. #7
    Join Date: Apr 2008

    Location: Warrington

    Posts: 3,451
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Minstrel SE View Post
    yeah I dont think he would have stuck it on for no real reason. I will probably get some of those foam pieces if I can find it. I will have to cut nice circles so its all extra work to be done properly.

    What I dont understand then is why you dont really see it on other speaker designs if it is important
    Joe Akroyd had quite a unique approach to speaker design, involving a lot of computer modelling, hand-doping of bespoke drivers on a specialised measurement jig etc. The foam is there to take the edge off the already quite toppy and raw traditional Royd designs. Also, the grilles are designed to be left on (despite my profile pic)...
    Mana Acoustics Racks / Bright Star IsoNodes Decoupling >> Allo DigiOne Player >> Pedja Rogic's Audial Model S DAC + Pioneer PL-71 turntable / Vista Audio phono-1 mk II / Denon PCL-5 headshell / Reson Reca >> LFD DLS >> LFD PA2M (SE) >> Royd RR3s.

  8. #8
    Join Date: Apr 2011

    Location: cheltenham

    Posts: 746
    I'm matt.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lawrence001 View Post
    I always assumed it would stop the treble traveling along the cabinet and diffracting on the cabinet corners causing smearing of the image.

    Sent from my BLN-L21 using Tapatalk
    I can say with 100% confidence that it will make no difference. It's only about 2mm thick and closed cell foam. LS3/5a foam would be open cell and a lot thicker.

  9. #9
    Join Date: Jun 2015

    Location: London/Durham

    Posts: 6,878
    I'm Lawrence.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fatmarley View Post
    I can say with 100% confidence that it will make no difference. It's only about 2mm thick and closed cell foam. LS3/5a foam would be open cell and a lot thicker.
    How would closed cell foam be less effective at reducing diffraction effects than open cell? Genuine question.

    Sent from my BLN-L21 using Tapatalk

  10. #10
    Join Date: Apr 2011

    Location: cheltenham

    Posts: 746
    I'm matt.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lawrence001 View Post
    How would closed cell foam be less effective at reducing diffraction effects than open cell? Genuine question.

    Sent from my BLN-L21 using Tapatalk
    It's quite a complicated question to answer (properly). Closed cell foam would be no different to a flat baffle made of something solid. The sound would still diffract off it in the same way. Open cell foam absorbs sound but if the open cell foam was only 2mm thick it would hardly make any difference. The sound energy absorbed by acoustic foam can be measured and the official term is NRC (Noise reduction coefficient). In an ideal situation, the whole baffle would be covered in a thick layer of it.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •