+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 71

Thread: How long have we got?

  1. #41
    Join Date: Dec 2008

    Location: East Riding of Yorkshire these days

    Posts: 4,779
    I'm Shaun.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anthonyTD View Post
    I think all formats of music will be around as long as there are folk who want, and value diversity.
    So well spoken and accurate. Diversity is at the very heart of what we listen to and how we listen to it. Off to the chippy now

  2. #42
    Join Date: Oct 2018

    Location: Forest of Dean

    Posts: 643
    I'm Gary.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Haselsh1 View Post
    I personally think that rather than get worked up and anxious about audio formats we should be more worried about the future of the hi-fi industry and the lack of interest these days from up and coming potential customers. Looking back to 1983 I remember a huge market for hi-fi, I don't see that market anymore.
    Very true.

    Very few "younger" people listen on anything other than Bluetooth speakers or headphones and many "older" hifi buffs are switching to Sonos type systems for convenience.
    I too wonder what future there is for multi-box hifi, it will probably become an even more niche market the cost of which will be prohibitive to newcomers?
    Marantz CD63 KI Signature
    Project Debut II
    Pioneer A656 Reference
    Epos M5s
    Atacama Stands
    Maplin speaker cable cos I can't hear a difference
    Various interconnects as above

  3. #43
    Join Date: Dec 2008

    Location: East Riding of Yorkshire these days

    Posts: 4,779
    I'm Shaun.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaz View Post
    Very true.

    Very few "younger" people listen on anything other than Bluetooth speakers or headphones and many "older" hifi buffs are switching to Sonos type systems for convenience.
    I too wonder what future there is for multi-box hifi, it will probably become an even more niche market the cost of which will be prohibitive to newcomers?
    Yes Gary, take a look at the housing market which is pretty much essential and hardly a luxury. If the cost of housing is so extreme, what hope is there for unnecessary items like audio..?

  4. #44
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 37,879
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Houses are so expensive because there aren't enough of them. You can't really say the same thing about hi-fi equipment.
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.

  5. #45
    Join Date: Jan 2009

    Location: Essex

    Posts: 31,976
    I'm openingabottleofwine.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Haselsh1 View Post
    I had a three hour music session last night playing nothing but CD's (Dire Straits' white album and Shpongle's Museum of Consciousness).
    Funnily enough I had a six hour session yesterday, playing all nine Beethoven symphonies. These were mono recordings made in the late 40s, early 50s, and remastered to CD. So a delightful mix of technology - and yes they sounded great; I became really engaged and engrossed with the performances (otherwise I wouldn't have spent so much time listening to them).
    Barry

  6. #46
    Join Date: Oct 2018

    Location: Forest of Dean

    Posts: 643
    I'm Gary.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Macca View Post
    Houses are so expensive because there aren't enough of them. You can't really say the same thing about hi-fi equipment.
    True, that's expensive because people are prepared to pay high prices.
    Marantz CD63 KI Signature
    Project Debut II
    Pioneer A656 Reference
    Epos M5s
    Atacama Stands
    Maplin speaker cable cos I can't hear a difference
    Various interconnects as above

  7. #47
    Join Date: Apr 2016

    Location: Gravesend and France

    Posts: 1,498
    I'm paul.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Haselsh1 View Post
    I had a three hour music session last night playing nothing but CD's (Dire Straits' white album and Shpongle's Museum of Consciousness).
    And your point is?
    I find cd much the same as streaming so cd is an inconvenience having to get up and change discs. Vinyl is a more worthwhile inconvenience.
    Bakoon 13r Denon DP80 Stax UA-70 Shure Ultra 500 in a Martin Bastin body with jico stylus, project ds2 digital Rullit aero 8 field coils in tqwt speakers

    Office system, DIY CSS fullrange speakers with aurum cantus G2 ribbons yulong dac Sony STR6055 receiver Jvc QL-A51 direct drive turntable, Leema sub. JVC Z4S cart is in the house

    Garage system another Sony receiver, cassette deck


    System components are subject to change without warning and at the discretion of the owner.

  8. #48
    Join Date: Aug 2017

    Location: Hertfordshire, U.K.

    Posts: 298
    I'm Graham.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by struth View Post
    My vinyl only runs to about 330 now, but its value is nearly 7k. realistically I wont get that of course, but i will have cost more to buy. You can see it quickly adds up. I certainly wouldnt be starting again seriously with it unless i was in a strong financial position. But there is no doubt there is nothing like it when done well. Especially if you like classical as you can pick up nice stuff cheap in secondhand shops still as its not popular.
    Same here. But my vinyl only has monetary value if I sell it or lose it. I could never replace it.
    GrahamS - It's not what you hear that counts, it's what you think you hear........

    Present Kit: NAD 326BEE, NAD C515BEE CD player, JVC QL-7 DD turntable, JVC Tonearm, Shure M97Ve, Audio Technica AT95EX, Pickering V15, JVC Z1E, Wharfedale Diamond 230s, Visual Rio interconnects and My Ears.

  9. #49
    Join Date: Nov 2008

    Location: Valley of the Hazels

    Posts: 9,139
    I'm AMusicFanNotAnAudiophile.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulf-2007 View Post
    And your point is?
    I find cd much the same as streaming so cd is an inconvenience having to get up and change discs. Vinyl is a more worthwhile inconvenience.
    Don't forget all the additional exercise as a plus point
    Chris



    Common sense isn't anymore!

  10. #50
    Join Date: Jan 2009

    Location: Essex

    Posts: 31,976
    I'm openingabottleofwine.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulf-2007 View Post
    And your point is?
    I find cd much the same as streaming so cd is an inconvenience having to get up and change discs. Vinyl is a more worthwhile inconvenience.
    Yes, you have to get up every 20 minutes to turn the record over, re-fit the record clamp,clean the surface with a record brush, check the stylus is clean and cue the pickup arm. Whereas with a CD, you just pop it in the drawer and press 'play' - and you only need do that every 60 minutes or so.
    Barry

+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •