+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 82

Thread: Half speed mastering

  1. #61
    Join Date: Mar 2017

    Location: Liverpool

    Posts: 766
    I'm Sandro.

    Default

    If you believe at that bullshit you have to listen to the Free Fire and Water Rip off
    I don't have the catalog number of the Abbey Road as I have returned it
    but I I said on this forum the old Catalog ILPS 9120 sound much better

    If they did the best they could why the run off at the end of the album is so huge?


    Again, to you all in general could you please post the catalog numbers it does not take much effort as you got the album there, that is if you really got it like
    Last edited by Bksabath; 09-12-2018 at 12:25.

  2. #62
    Join Date: May 2017

    Location: newcastle upon tyne

    Posts: 230
    I'm barry.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bksabath View Post
    If you believe at that bullshit you have to listen to the Free Fire and Water Rip off
    I don't have the catalog number of the Abbey Road as I have returned it
    but I I said on this forum the old Catalog ILPS 9120 sound much better

    If they did the best they could why the run off at the end of the album is so huge?


    Again, to you all in general could you please post the catalog numbers it does not take much effort as you got the album there, that is if you really got it like
    As soon as I can get near my copy I will post numbers.

    Free Fire & Water halfspeed sounds jaw droppingly good?

  3. #63
    Join Date: Mar 2017

    Location: Liverpool

    Posts: 766
    I'm Sandro.

    Default

    The Abbey Road Fire and Water half speed sound like just a copy of a bad CD and the certificate is not good to use as toilet paper

  4. #64
    Join Date: Apr 2016

    Location: Gravesend and France

    Posts: 1,498
    I'm paul.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete The Cat View Post
    I bought Deep Purple's "Fireball" half speed which was released on 22nd November. By now I must have put Ian Paice's children and grandchildren through school after buying multiple copies of their '70s albums.

    It's three dimensional compared with the somewhat flat Friday Music reissue and without the compression of the 25th anniversary CD. Still about the same as the original vinyl, mind. It's a very well recorded and produced record given that it was released in '71, sounding better than many of today's albums.

    Pete
    What a drummer, one of my favourites. I've been pondering buying fireball, may leave it until after the Christmas madness.
    Bakoon 13r Denon DP80 Stax UA-70 Shure Ultra 500 in a Martin Bastin body with jico stylus, project ds2 digital Rullit aero 8 field coils in tqwt speakers

    Office system, DIY CSS fullrange speakers with aurum cantus G2 ribbons yulong dac Sony STR6055 receiver Jvc QL-A51 direct drive turntable, Leema sub. JVC Z4S cart is in the house

    Garage system another Sony receiver, cassette deck


    System components are subject to change without warning and at the discretion of the owner.

  5. #65
    Join Date: Nov 2008

    Location: Valley of the Hazels

    Posts: 9,139
    I'm AMusicFanNotAnAudiophile.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bksabath View Post
    The Abbey Road Fire and Water half speed sound like just a copy of a bad CD and the certificate is not good to use as toilet paper
    You've been on (and on, and on....) about this at great length.

    Abbey Road studios worked with the master they were given to work with.
    They were not given a stereo master tape. They were given the master files (ie WAV files) to work with. Abbey Road Studios did not do any transfers from tape for the project.
    Someone else did all of the work before Abbey Road Studios got hold of the master files. The record company that has the rights to the material, and the surviving band members are happy with the mastering work that was handed over to Abbey Road Studios to be cut to lacquer.

    The lacquers were cut at half speed using the methods outlined.
    The certificate does not make any great claim about anything.



    You should read this, paying particular attention to questions 4 & 5 https://shop.abbeyroad.com/Music/Vin...er/4ZB70CAC0KX
    Last edited by Stratmangler; 10-12-2018 at 19:44.
    Chris



    Common sense isn't anymore!

  6. #66
    Join Date: May 2017

    Location: newcastle upon tyne

    Posts: 230
    I'm barry.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stratmangler View Post
    You've been on (and on, and on....) about this at great length.

    Abbey Road studios worked with the master they were given to work with.
    They were not given a stereo master tape. They were given the master files (ie WAV files) to work with. Abbey Road Studios did not do any transfers from tape for the project.
    Someone else did all of the work before Abbey Road Studios got hold of the master files. The record company that has the rights to the material, and the surviving band members are happy with the mastering work that was handed over to Abbey Road Studios to be cut to lacquer.

    The lacquers were cut at half speed using the methods outlined.
    The certificate does not make any great claim about anything.



    You should read this, paying particular attention to questions 4 & 5 https://shop.abbeyroad.com/Music/Vin...er/4ZB70CAC0KX
    I knew I had seen that artical somewhere, thanks Chris.

  7. #67
    Join Date: Nov 2008

    Location: Valley of the Hazels

    Posts: 9,139
    I'm AMusicFanNotAnAudiophile.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr Winston O Boogie View Post
    I knew I had seen that artical somewhere, thanks Chris.
    You're welcome

    One where they had an original stereo master tape was John Martyn's Solid Air, which IMO is stunning
    https://shop.abbeyroad.com/Music/Vin...ir/4ZB80CAC0KX
    Chris



    Common sense isn't anymore!

  8. #68
    Join Date: Mar 2017

    Location: Liverpool

    Posts: 766
    I'm Sandro.

    Default

    Transform difficult to cut Bla bla bla there isn't any on a flipping wav file

    Master of highest quality ? explain the huge run off

    The certificate paper is to thick and quite rough

    Solid air may be a good one

    Fire an water is not



    end of story for me

  9. #69
    Join Date: Nov 2008

    Location: Valley of the Hazels

    Posts: 9,139
    I'm AMusicFanNotAnAudiophile.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bksabath View Post
    Transform difficult to cut Bla bla bla there isn't any on a flipping wav file

    Master of highest quality ? explain the huge run off

    The certificate paper is to thick and quite rough

    Solid air may be a good one

    Fire an water is not



    end of story for me
    You're adding lots of words and alleged claims that just aren't being made.
    And the bit about "The certificate paper is too thick and quite rough" is, quite frankly, a somewhat childish and petty comment.
    We've heard you lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots of times moaning about it - it's about time you moved on with it.

    We get that you don't like it.
    You don't have to go on about it ad nauseum.
    Chris



    Common sense isn't anymore!

  10. #70
    Join Date: Mar 2017

    Location: Liverpool

    Posts: 766
    I'm Sandro.

    Default

    DO you work for Abbey road ?

    This is the only thing that would explain you ganging up on me

    What is wrong whit asking you or any whit a bit of brain to explain the huge run off ?

    I am only following on as it is polite to reply to post directed at me

    As You say I put forward the FACT that the fire and water is a turd in nice packaging and the Abbey road is only a marketing exercise
    It is a FACT that an old original copy sound much better

+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •