These kind of statements make me laugh out loud, the VRDS mechanism in a TEAC VRDS T1 has as much in common with a high end Esoteric VRDS mechanism as a Fiat 500 has with a formula one car. They are both VRDS just as they are both cars, but that is all they have in common.
The CMK-4 CMK-4.2 and CMK-4.5 VRDS variants fitted to the TEAC T1, VRDS 7, VRDS 8, VRDS 9, P-500 and Esoteric P-500 were awful and easily bettered by Pioneer stable platter machines costing far less.
As can be seen, it has a plastic clamp, tiny brush motor that costs about 50 cents, the whole mechanism is built around this motors bearings and puny shaft and its mounted on a thin "Zintec" steel Bridge.
The Bridge on the CMK-4, as used on the T1 Transport, had a ribbed plastic cover that was purely cosmetic, as can be seen in the strip down on the lampizator site:
http://www.lampizator.eu/lampizator/...1/VRDS-T1.html
This is the VRDS NEO variant used on top end Esoteric models, there is no comparison.
It uses a 6mm bearing shaft, brushless hall effect motor(see below), aero space quality bearings a laminated platter construction, Sanyo Laser and is very, very robust.
The mid range CMK-3.2 variant of VRDS is a much better mechanism than any of the CMK-4.(X) and a machine built around this is worth consideration.
Models like VRDS 10, VRDS 10SE, VRDS 20, VRDS 25, TEAC P-700, Esoteric P-700 all used this variant, coupled with the better Sony KSS-151A Laser assembly.
It has good bearings a hall effect motor and metal clamp, the plastic moulded bridge is well braced and much more rigid than the Zintec one.
This is what this transport looks like:
Strangely enough, the models using the better CMK-3.2 mechanism are not much more expensive on the used market, than the inferior CMK-4.(X) machines.
All but the high end machines, benefit from a Clock and dedicated PSU upgrade and if you are using SPDIF a better output board, using a 75ohm BNC connection.
Do a little research before diving in on a VRDS machine as they are not all equal, far from it!