Well I have a variety Shane, but the current rig is driving two pairs of Corellis in parallel and sounding surprisingly good.
Well I have a variety Shane, but the current rig is driving two pairs of Corellis in parallel and sounding surprisingly good.
It is impossible for anything digital to sound analogue, because it isn't analogue!
You gravitate to the Corellis a lot. I remember you having a pair a few years back.
Have fun.
S.
Shane Lonergan.
Geoff, how are you managing impedance between your NAD and your double Kefs? My understanding is the NAD is (nominally) rated at 8Ω and the KEFs also (nominally) at 8Ω. However running the Kefs in parallel brings the impendence load to 4Ω. But perhaps my understanding is wrong. Or perhaps the NAD can dip way below 8Ω temporally and/or you are not playing music very loud with lots of bass such that the load presented to the NAD is very benign in practice.
Current: [P20] Roon/Tidal > Custom PC> Chevron Paradox NDF16 > Phast Pre > Neuro. 686 > Tannoy Berkley (RFC tweaks)
Yes, it becomes a nominal 4 ohm load. The NAD should cope just fine.
It is impossible for anything digital to sound analogue, because it isn't analogue!
Old school NADs are in the ranks of the few budget amps that don't mind low impedance/reactive loads. Within reason anyway.
The 3020 was still fairy acceptable into 2 ohm.
Current Lash Up:
TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.
Pre & Power
Technics SUC 909U & Technics SE A909S
Turntable
Thorens TD 125 MK1 , SME 3009 S2 Non Improved , Shure V15 II , SME 2000 Plinth
CD Transport & DAC & PSU
Marantz 6005 , Beresford Caiman , Paul Hynes SR4
Front Loudspeakers
Tannoy 615 MK2
Rear Satellite Loudspeakers
Wharfedale DX 1
It is impossible for anything digital to sound analogue, because it isn't analogue!
Nice neat system.
S.
Shane Lonergan.