View Poll Results: Which one?

Voters
12. You may not vote on this poll
  • Nagaoka MP-110

    7 58.33%
  • Rega Carbon

    1 8.33%
  • Other (please state in thread)

    4 33.33%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31

Thread: Nagaoka MP-110 or Rega Carbon?

  1. #11
    Join Date: Mar 2014

    Location: Netherlands

    Posts: 42
    I'm Han.

    Default

    My Nag MP110 plays very musical, detailed yet warm and without IGD in the RB250/TecnoWeight on a Michell TecnoDec
    Just what you're looking for
    Michell TecnoDec/Mi250/MP110; Cyrus CD8se; Cyrus FM7 > Exposure INT XXX > Exposure LScable >
    Harbeth C7ES-3 35th Anniversary; Supra, Harmtech, AQ Netpower; DNM Interlinks

  2. #12
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 37,891
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    I agree a better cartridge would be worthwhile especially given the quality of the deck and arm but given the choice of these two I'd take the Nagaoka over a cheap, re-badged AT.
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.

  3. #13
    Join Date: Feb 2011

    Location: South Wales

    Posts: 7,487
    I'm the'greatunwashed'.

    Default

    Thanks guys for the suggestions so far - I have heard a 2M 'Red' and it wasn't for me, I found it too harsh and detailed for my tastes, I guess I lean more toward a pipe and slippers sound. I have also heard some very expensive Shelter cartridges (only two to be fair, in very different systems) and to me they sounded more 'digital' than my current FBA system and I didn't enjoy either of them. I have worked hard to make my system sound as un-digital as possible and have been complemented on how it sounds and how non-fatiguing it is to listen to, which it has to be with the amount of time I spend playing music. I just love the sound as I have said many times before - mostly because of the Harbeth's.

    I get the points about spending more and money isn't really the issue, it's just that I am finding it hard to justify that much on a source component which will only be used occasionally, as opposed to many hours a day, every day, which my FBA system is and it will always remain my primary source. I think it was Martin (Macca) who posted some time ago about his costs and calculated it worked out about 50p a play, taking cartridge cost (not sure what the cart was) and life expectancy into consideration - I nearly fell off my chair when I read that. That would mean about £6-8.00 a day for me running a turntable, which just wouldn't work. If you look at my play history since April 2012 (68,282 tracks) and took an average of say 8 songs per LP side, that's over £4,000! I know I wouldn't play that many LPs in reality, it would be a mixture of FBA and vinyl, but that's a scary figure for me to consider, when buying cartridges.

    The Nag is looking a good bet and if I find I am enjoying and playing a lot more records than FBA, then I could reconsider when it comes time to replace it, maybe with a Nag around the 2-300 mark like a 150 or maybe 200 as Marco suggests. I'm surprised no-one has said anything positive about the Carbon, as I seem to remember reading some rave reviews here? Don't forget guys I am looking for a budget cartridge at the moment.

    Good info though, all very useful knowledge which has been very helpful
    Last edited by Tim; 03-02-2015 at 18:14.
    "People will hear what you tell them to hear" - Thomas Edison

  4. #14
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Galashiels

    Posts: 13,695
    I'm inthescottishmafia.

    Default

    “Music has always been a matter of energy to me, a question of fuel. Sentimental people call it inspiration, but what they really mean is fuel. I have always needed fuel. I am a serious consumer. On some nights I still believe that a car with the gas needle on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio”

    Hunter S Thompson

  5. #15
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 37,891
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    That cost per play was based on a replacement stylus for a Nag Mp500 costing £220 and the estimated stylus life being 200 hrs BUT there are some buts there, there seem to be a number of different estimations of the longevity of these needles, the 200 hours is taken from Nags own website and may well be a misprint.

    Ulitmately if your vinyl use is going to be anything other than a couple of spins a month just for the novelty then you really do need to spend some money if you want to approach the quality of budget digital. That means a quality stylus that will track the inner grooves without distorting and a record cleaning machine of some description.

    Vinyl is very much a secondary source for me but even then if I add up the cost of TT, cart and RCM that is £1500 right there. That is more than the rest of the system put together. And the difference in quality between my TT set up and something like Marco's is comparable with the distance from the Earth to the Moon.

    You can't do vinyl properly on the cheap. It is the nature of the beast.
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.

  6. #16
    Join Date: Apr 2012

    Location: N E Kent

    Posts: 51,625
    I'm Geoff.

    Default

    200 hours has to be wrong Martin. There's a '0' missing.
    It is impossible for anything digital to sound analogue, because it isn't analogue!

  7. #17
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Galashiels

    Posts: 13,695
    I'm inthescottishmafia.

    Default

    That was my thought.
    “Music has always been a matter of energy to me, a question of fuel. Sentimental people call it inspiration, but what they really mean is fuel. I have always needed fuel. I am a serious consumer. On some nights I still believe that a car with the gas needle on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio”

    Hunter S Thompson

  8. #18
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 37,891
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    That was the eventual conclusion, although if the site did not have so many other typos it would be a bit concerning. Even at 2000 hours that is still approx 23p a side
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.

  9. #19
    Join Date: Apr 2009

    Location: Near Saffron Walden, Essex

    Posts: 7,090
    I'm Dave.

    Default

    The Carbon is an excellent budget cartridge and there is nothing to match it at anywhere near the price. If you want a good, inexpensive stop gap, it will be ideal. What's not to like at £25.99 ?

  10. #20
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Newcastle UK

    Posts: 3,745
    I'm Rich.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Macca View Post
    I agree a better cartridge would be worthwhile especially given the quality of the deck and arm but given the choice of these two I'd take the Nagaoka over a cheap, re-badged AT.
    So would I...

    Forget about Rega unless you're after an Exact

    Even then it's a marmite cartridge, but nice in an all Rega system.
    One of these days... I'm going to cut you into little pieces.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •