"Up Yours Marco": the title of RD's new rant...
{Moved from the 'Why is HFW so biased against classic cartridges?' thread}
The ones I am told to answer
1 - I would with pleasure if I had a clue as to what you are talking about, as it seems to resemble nothing I wrote.Originally Posted by Marco
1I think you're clearly lacking introspection. If you honestly believe that then why can't you extend this courtesy to those who use and enjoy equipment that is derived from a different technology to that which you use, manufacture, and deem as being 'superior', instead of rather disrespectfully labelling them with some crass terminology or description that you've invented in your head?
Oh, and I'd like an answer to that one please!!
2Experience tells me that Denon transformers (and the A23) optimise the sound of the DL-103 better than any other transformers I've heard so far, and way better than any active MC stage I've heard *so far* - it's as simple as that. However, I'm up for being convinced differently as a result of something better being demonstrated to me. Show me how much better an NVA MC stage is and I'll gladly acknowledge it!
3What a load of utter pish (as they say in the city of my birth)!
Marco.
2 - I have had enough of forum owners trying to ponce equipment off me, I have had about four emails from so called owners and moderators on Head-Fi asking if want good review there. Even the UK headphone forum owner was trying to ponce one last year - it must be a headphone amp thing. Simple answer - no - you are a punter and no big shit just because you share ownership on a forum. Even if you were a big shit or a industry slurper you would have even less chance. My customers become my friends, when I know them and trust them they can borrow anything. You my dear feller are neither.
3 - I never heard that expression in Forte de Marmi last year.
) posts to a seperate thread and we'll discuss them there. You can also name the thread whatever you want.
