I have had some experiences with Rusky valves and thought a thread may take some of the mystery and misconceptions out of buying experience.
I never liked the 6P14P- EV as they where strident and grainy in my amp.
I was told that that's because they where late 80's production after the cold war and that the 70's stuff is much better sounding.
I use the Reflector 6H30pi new production by Sovtek cryo treated by tubeman in my headphone amp now driven by Mullard M8100's but I just ordered some 1971 Vishods 6ZH1P-EV they are also in the EF-95 family and are well regarded but they haven't arived yet.
And my headphone amp just sounds great, better than the 1975 6H6pi I was using before the newer 6H30's .
This is a great little piece on EF-95 tubes.
http://www.head-fi.org/t/563884/litt...e#post_7625993
I think Russian tubes are often easily dismissed and after buying some Genulex Gold lion ECC83/B759 reissues for my DAC and I couldn't be happier.
I'm told there is no difference between todays 6H30 and the Super tubes of the 80's and some say even some of the 70's tubes where not much better.
I'm pretty pleased with my headphone amp and I think the 6H30PI is such a fantastic tube by design it's hard to go wrong.
I was told the Cryo treatment distresses the metal and makes it harder due to changing the temper and aligning the grain structure.
I believe it, as I have seen positive results in rifle barrels where group size has dropped from 1 inch to below less than half of that using the same match ammo, it reduces the number of patches it takes to clean the barrel and reduces barrel erosion from powder(much like a sand Blaster)
A 40XC went from a logged 5000 shots,to just over 8,000 shots with out being re chambered using the same match loads after a cryo treatment.
A match barrel is long and is usually cut down and rechamberd once so getting 3000 more shots each go around means 16,000 shots insted of 10,000 before a compleate re barrel, that is huge to a competitor.
So it dose have an effect on metal hardness.