Hi Jerry
How about an in depth comparative review between the two...just to put more flesh on the above post. I have a respect for Ed Meitner designs despite not having heard any. Your shared experience with both units could bring light to the eternal Valve VS Solid State pre debate. You write well go on give it a try. This is SOG after all.
Regards D S D L
Regards Neil
True Mike,but one thing I don't have is a decent pre!
Location: gone
Posts: 11,519
I'm gone.
Hi Neil
Yep, I fully intend to do just that! You may note that I titled this thread Review / Blog .... i.e. an ongoing thread detailing my findings as I settle in with the wee beastie.
.... but, yes, the Meitner brand has a very strong following on t'other side of the Pond - which is why I was tempted to buy the pre-amp in the first place from Nick at the Emporium (top bloke, btw). I must admit that I have been very pleased with it indeed. It just seems to make music in a very natural and unforced way - quite unusual for a solid state pre, in my experience. And it's a lovely thing to look at, too - that woodwork is a thing of beauty.
More anon .....
.
Hi Jerry
I am looking forward to reading your blog/review,as it progresses....
Regards D S D L
Regards Neil
Location: gone
Posts: 11,519
I'm gone.
Interesting listening session last night.
The WAD pre2 is by no means having it all its own way. I didn't notice at first - funny how impressions grow and change their focus as you start to listen more to a component! - but the imaging thru the WAD doesn't quite have the focus and 'in the room' presence of the Meitner. Sound images of vocalists, for example, are larger and vaguer - more amorphous and less solid.
There's more openness and tautness to the sound overall though thru the WAD, in terms of temporal rez rather than spatial. Things seem to happen that bit faster.
Towards the end of the evening my attention began to be drawn toward the tonality/richness of the sound. I'm not quite sure what is happening there yet, but certainly some differences from the Meitner (which is quite a rich sounding & tonally vibrant device).
Interestingly, there seems at the moment to be more of a difference between the WAD and the Meitner when using LP rather than CD. LP sound definitely has more grip and tautness and interest thru the WAD. Same tt, same phono stage (see sig below). Just the line level pre has changed. I'm not sure what to make of that!
Mornings are quiet here in Chateau Jerry, as swmbo is a late riser, so I'm about to pop the lid on the pre and have a peep at the valve. I'll take a photo of the innards whilst I am at it ....
.
Location: gone
Posts: 11,519
I'm gone.
Well, that's a surprise ... the valve is a Sovtek 6922 / ecc88.
Hmmm. Any thoughts on that?
There's a Mullard ecc88 on eBay auction ending this evening ...
And here's a pic of the innards .... Nice hefty looking trannies!
Last edited by jandl100; 26-03-2009 at 08:11.
.
Now that you've taken a photo I'm reminded that there is no coupling capacitor so that's one less thing to worry about!