Hi All,
An interesting debate. I have to say that I am somthing of a sceptic, but I do believe that state of mind has a major influence on our perception of sound. I would certainly perceive sound differently if I have a headache compared to when I am in a 'medidative' state.
My main difficulty with these techniques is that one is always aware that one has changed something, and that introduces the possibility of placebo effect/confirmation bias or other mechanisms that effect psychoacoustic perception. Accepting that these theories aren't objectively provable or measurable in a conventional sense, how can one be certain of anything if a 'product' has a consistent beneficial effect even for individuals, much less across a population?.
I am quite comfortable with the idea that performing HiFI rituals has an effect on perception, but so does relaxation training and so do drugs of all sorts. I am just not convinced that the theories of Peter Belt et al are anything other than an attempt at rationalising a common-place experience and creating a belief system that bleads to self-affirmation of beneficial effects.
Having said all of that, I don't have any axe to grind here and certainly have no issue with people doi ng whatever they believe works for them.
Regards,
Alex
Technics SL1210| Jelco SA-750| Benz Micro ACE SM MC| Squeezebox Touch/MCRU linear PSU | Cambridge Audio 851C | High Resolution Music Streamer II+ / Linestreamer+ | Raspberry Pi 2/IQ-Audio DAC+ / Max2Play | Conrad-Johnson ET3 Control Amplifier| Conrad-Johnson LP125sa KT120 Power Amplifier| Avalon NP Evo 2.0 Speakers| Cardas Audio Quadlink-5C Speaker Cables and Interconnects| Finite Elemente Pagode Signature E-14 equipment support