+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: Back In The Day..........

  1. #11
    Join Date: Jun 2010

    Location: Scotland

    Posts: 1,940
    I'm Tom.

    Default

    My first aftermarket interconnect was bought around 1978 and made by Audioquest as I recall. I remember being undrwhelmed by it's performance, especially at the price I paid for it.

    Next was a Van Den Hul speaker cable circa 1983 which again wasn't cheap and to be honest the sonic 'improvement' didn't bowl me over either.

    From that, one could gather that I :-

    a) Didn't have a good enough system

    b) My hearing was suspect

    c) The cables were more marketing hype than substance

    My instincts at the time were favouring c) and as time went on the legend of cable products were based more on folklore and wishful thinking than actual performance, not to mention the price tags of these baubles, so I started making my own for considerably less money and greater sonic benefits.

    Oddly enough, it wasn't until I started playing around with mains cables that the light suddenly came on that I wasn't putting in a sooper dooper cable, but actually taking the inadequate cheapo cables OUT and putting something less inadequate in. The better the cable spec and build quality, the less inadequate it was, culminating in the realisation that no cable is ever perfect so all our choices rest between those two extremes.

  2. #12
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: Lancaster(-ish), UK

    Posts: 16,937
    I'm ChrisB.

    Default

    It's very interesting to go back & look at the prices that cables were sold at.
    Hi-Fi Answers March 1989 - KJ West One 'The Speed of Sound' advert (....ahem - no ill intent towards anyone who may have been involved)

    1 metre pairs of interconnects:

    QED Incon - £14.95
    QED Incon Screen - £18.95
    DNM Solid Core - £25.00
    Deltec Slink - £32.00
    Monster Interlink 400 - £32.00
    Kimber PSB - £36.80
    Monster Interlink CD - £46.00
    Vecteur - £49.00
    Audioquest Livewire Ruby - £45.00
    van den Hul D102 Mk.II - £66.00

  3. #13
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: Lancaster(-ish), UK

    Posts: 16,937
    I'm ChrisB.

    Default

    QED Incon - £14.95
    QED Incon Screen - £18.95
    DNM Solid Core - £25.00
    Deltec Slink - £32.00
    Monster Interlink 400 - £32.00
    Kimber PSB - £36.80
    Monster Interlink CD - £46.00
    Vecteur - £49.00
    Audioquest Livewire Ruby - £45.00
    van den Hul D102 Mk.II - £66.00

    Does anyone know the costs of the nearest modern equivalents?

  4. #14
    Join Date: May 2011

    Location: Torquay

    Posts: 2,719
    I'm Craig.

    Default

    At the risk of exposing how long ago I got into hifi..........I was talking 73/74 about the apparent lack of after market wires..........

  5. #15
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: Lancaster(-ish), UK

    Posts: 16,937
    I'm ChrisB.

    Default

    From The Grave

  6. #16
    MartinT Guest

    Default

    I bought quite a lot of Kimber PSB back then. I don't regret it as it was good for its time and started me down the road of enquiry about cables in general. I also bought a Monster CD interconnect in the mid eighties which was crap.

  7. #17
    Join Date: Dec 2008

    Location: Yorks

    Posts: 16,643
    I'm Nobody.

    Default

    I'll argue to the death that the late 60's was the best time for Hi-Fi..

    specialist this that & other! Ha

  8. #18
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: Lancaster(-ish), UK

    Posts: 16,937
    I'm ChrisB.

    Default

    If we're talking about the pre-CD days (as per Craig's post no. 14), the main source was the turntable for most people and I don't think there were that many after-market arm cables. I suspect people were more engrossed in tinkering with mats and headshells than cables.

  9. #19
    Join Date: Dec 2008

    Location: Yorks

    Posts: 16,643
    I'm Nobody.

    Default

    Ah well been there never ever again will i waste money on farting about..

    However i'm not sure if im imagining things but more people are buying Vintage gear are they not ??
    Last edited by Rare Bird; 01-04-2013 at 10:11.

  10. #20
    Join Date: Jun 2010

    Location: Scotland

    Posts: 1,940
    I'm Tom.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rare Bird View Post

    However i'm not sure if im imagining things but more people are buying Vintage gear are they not ??
    Probably because the brand new gear is so damn expensive

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •