pretty much my feelings. there are worse folk out there with privilage
Printable View
The imagery he used was racist, simple as that. His motivations are only known to him. The BBC did the right thing.
However there is history of bad behaviour being forgiven (forgotten) in the past, so no doubt they will let him back.
First one is a badly written rant with nothing to back it up. Doesn't mention the Royals.
Second one is better written but again has nothing to back it up. Doesn't mention the Royals.
Third one has sentences like Anyone who has even vaguely become acquainted with paedophilia knows very well that they will go to the ends of the earth to keep their activities absolutely secret.
Yeah, no shit Sherlock.
Doesn't mention the Royals although I admit I only skimmed it.
The reason there's tons of this stuff around is because it's the internet. Would you like to see some articles about how the Royals are really alien lizard men from beyond the Moon? There's tons of that stuff too.
Nope, but that's just stuff I found on a two minute Google search, which gives a 'flavour' of what can be discovered (much of which is public knowledge) and which has far greater credibility, if you dig deeper and *really* know where to look!
Don't forget too, that Snapper (David), one of my best friends, whom you've met, used to work in the press, and I can tell you had access to damming material in relation to this stuff [Jill Dando and Jimmy Saville - all related], which at the time it was happening, wasn't 'allowed' by the powers that be to see the light of day, and so which you won't find on any Internet search.
I don't expect you to accept what I'm telling you. Believe what you like, but I've seen enough evidence that for me conclusively proves that many members of the Royal Family and governments, past and present, were paedophiles.
So salute them? I'd spit in their eye!
Marco.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it is an impossibility and the law of averages says there were/are at least some kiddie fiddlers in the 'Establishment', if not necessarily in the present Royal Family. And I'm sure they have used their position to get away with it.
But you can't go about bandying accusations about specific individuals without hard evidence. 'I know someone who said it was true so it must be true'. Not good enough. What if it was a friend or relative of yours being accused like that? No evidence just a load of shit on the internet. You'd be very unhappy and rightly so.
Plus once you develop a culture in society where witch hunts become acceptable, no longer any need for proof, any one of us can be called out at any time as a kiddie fiddler, an especially handy tool to discredit and get rid of an opponent in business, sport, politics, you name it. You'll recall that in 'Blakes Seven' the Federation (AKA 'The Establishment') does exactly that to discredit Blake in the eyes of his followers and so disband his rebellion.
Ha - what, for them to cover it up? If only it were that simple, Paul. The law and system is fundamentally corrupt, and designed to protect 'the elite', many of whom are the worst offenders of them all!
Anyway, we're going way off-topic, and I'm ranting on one of my 'pet subjects', which I hold very passionate (and also informed) views about, so best leave it there for now;)
Marco.