You'll never know if it's inferior, or superior, unless you try one.
It's not difficult to change an arm.
Printable View
Oh I think the Dynavector is in a different class, but it's immaterial now.
I don't doubt the Dynavector is better, but just how much better is it?
Would I be prepared to pay the difference for the increase in performance? As it probably costs more than my entire system, I very much doubt it.
I'm very much after value for money with my purchases, and I think the Fx-1200 has given me that.
Sure, I don't have the ultimate sound, but I enjoy what I have. After a new platter and cartridge, that will probably do for a while.
I'm not advocating the Dynavector for everyone, Kevin! Sure, it's an expensive arm, although beautifully made, and the law of diminishing returns applies. In my case, I had wanted one for the best part of thirty years so it was wonderful to finally take delivery of one direct from Tokyo production. It's a superb sounding arm (to my ears, much better than an SME V, for instance) but isn't for everyone. I still believe I'm the only person in the world to have mounted one on a Technics SL-1210.
So yours is the deck on the Sound HiFi page?
I think it looks superb, but can only ponder what it sounds like.
One day, if I am lucky enough I may be in a position to purchase an arm of the same quality.
At the moment, life has other priorities for my hard earned cash.
Some reviews I have read say that the FXR is better than a SME IV or V, but I think reviews are very subjective.
How this translates to the FX-1200 is another question. The main thing is that the FX-1200 has given me an insight into the higher end, and I am happy with my purchase.
The detail extracted from the vinyl is definitely a step up, and with the AT150MLX I get a really natural sound from my system. I am at the point now of wondering if I need to improve my amplification, cables or speakers to get more from it.
I usually listen on headphones late at night, and I am happy with this element.
However, when the wife is out I use my main speakers.
Yes, it also appears on MCRU's pages.
Knowing Arthur's expertise, and although I haven't heard the FXR, I would expect it to perform well as he has a good handle on low resonance designs.
More photos of my arm/deck here.
Awesome looking system Martin
I love the deck and dynavector arm.
Alan
:)
My effort, inspired by the excellent work of Ken (Qwin) to whom I owe a thousand thanks for his support.
Alas...not up to his standards. But on the whole, from a distance, with the lights down, the effect is not too bad!
[IMG]http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j1...psdd15819e.jpg[/IMG]