ah yes, but they have skins on them, and if little johnny sees skins he wont eat them... little johnny doesnt like depriving a potato of its skin. so we get fries instead.. no skins:eyebrows:Quote:
Originally Posted by Marco
Printable View
ah yes, but they have skins on them, and if little johnny sees skins he wont eat them... little johnny doesnt like depriving a potato of its skin. so we get fries instead.. no skins:eyebrows:Quote:
Originally Posted by Marco
Lol - well 'little Johnny' needs a good boot up the arse!!
Marco.
The thing is, who's being allowed to apply the pressure that steers advertising (amongst other things) this way and why are they getting away with it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Marco
you will put him off his strawberry icecream doing that;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Marco
Little Johnny wants his chips to be amphibious landing craft shaped, and mum must oblige, or she's a bad parent :(Quote:
Originally Posted by struth
Wisdom has it that your brand has to be seen as being inclusive and diverse. So really it's market forces. Or someone's interpretation of what the market forces are.Quote:
Originally Posted by walpurgis
If they sell more oven chips they'll keep doing it. If they don't, expect a different style of ad campaign to come along soon.
I'll wager their research shows that 90% of oven chips are bought by women (or someone identifying as a woman).
So although us blokes (and those identifying as blokes) see the ads and scoff derisorily, women are more likely to think 'Ah that's lovely.'
Personally I've got more of an issue with that ad where a mature woman refers to her urine as 'wee'. I mean really?
There's another one, again a bird who won't see forty again, talking about her 'tummy'.
I'd ban the lot and spend the money instead on teaching folk how to cook!
Let's get BACK to BASICS:exactly:
Marco.
Ahem, Macca - still waiting on an answer... :wave::popcorn:Quote:
Originally Posted by Marco
;)
Marco.
he said iceland chips.. cheapest of the cheapQuote:
Originally Posted by Marco