Tell Me Something............Anything!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barry

I certainly would - the culmination of PC absurdity. Its bad enough new parents not wishing to identify the gender of their newborn by refering to it as "they"! They're too thick to realise "they" is third person plural; the correct gender-neutral singular pronoun would be "it".

---

If I found myself in conversation with such a person I would be referring to everyone else in the third person plural - it would confuse "them" no end, and hopefully they would then realise they are just being a dick.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by p147

That's really interesting, I can't wait.

---

Interesting indeed - thanks for this thread Paul, it's got me a little bit hooked! :) About time we had something that's not all doom and gloom

Here's a table of the new gender neutral personal pronouns. Get memorising, there'll be a test tomorrow:

https://i.ibb.co/tKBzSKw/pro.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Macca

Get memorising...

---

Do you mind if I don't bother? :D

You fail the test it's six ferulas and a Saturday morning detention - that's 3 hours of litter picking and trimming the grass verges with nail scissors.

Then you have to take it again.

:lol:

I'll be in the pub mate (or actually, sitting outside the pub wearing a mask, waiting for opening time in September).

You can laugh but it's already law in Canada https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/featur...c-16-explained

''If someone refused to use a preferred pronoun — and it was determined to constitute discrimination or harassment — could that potentially result in jail time?

It is possible, Brown says, through a process that would start with a complaint and progress to a proceeding before a human rights tribunal. If the tribunal rules that harassment or discrimination took place, there would typically be an order for monetary and non-monetary remedies. A non-monetary remedy may include sensitivity training, issuing an apology, or even a publication ban, he says''



I've no idea what 'sensitivity training' might entail but then it's been a while since I last read '1984'. I'm guessing the people who think these laws are a good idea have never read it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Macca

You fail the test it's six ferulas and a Saturday morning detention - that's 3 hours of litter picking and trimming the grass verges with nail scissors.

Then you have to take it again.

---

they were plants.. the stalks were used to lash :eyebrows: now we're talkin':eyebrows:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Macca

Here's a table of the new gender neutral personal pronouns. Get memorising, there'll be a test tomorrow:

https://i.ibb.co/tKBzSKw/pro.jpg

---

I'm trying to visualise what kind of person with nothing better to do thought that lot up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Macca

You can laugh but it's already law in Canada https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/featur...c-16-explained

''If someone refused to use a preferred pronoun — and it was determined to constitute discrimination or harassment — could that potentially result in jail time?

It is possible, Brown says, through a process that would start with a complaint and progress to a proceeding before a human rights tribunal. If the tribunal rules that harassment or discrimination took place, there would typically be an order for monetary and non-monetary remedies. A non-monetary remedy may include sensitivity training, issuing an apology, or even a publication ban, he says''



I've no idea what 'sensitivity training' might entail but then it's been a while since I last read '1984'. I'm guessing the people who think these laws are a good idea have never read it.

---

i was going to say a lot of bullshit, but i better be safe and say cattleshit