https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_(film)
I will be going to see it.
Printable View
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_(film)
I will be going to see it.
It's out Friday Neil, as is La Belle Époque Marco, which looks very interesting, I'll be seeing that as well, right up my street. I'm not averse to any genre of film if it's good, so don't mind a rom/com or love story ;)
Saw a featurette for 1917 yesterday, the new Sam Mendes film. It's a one shot movie, as in giving the impression it's a single continuous take with the camera never leaving the central characters. It looks incredible, only seen one other single shot movie Russian Ark, which unlike 1917 was apparently one continuous take from start to finish for the entire film.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hSjs2hBa94
the hitchcock film the rope was done that way.. well up to a point, as film cameras are limited to the amount of film they carry. it can be difficult to get right imo, and become stressful and then tedious if not done right.
Lol - I don't mind love stories, when there's something quirky about them, and which applies to La Belle Époque, or there's a sinister twist to the love angle, preferably involving someone dying at the end:D
'Straight' love stories don't do it for me, especially rom/coms, as I simply find them vacuous and banal. The 'com' bit is usually the worst part, as I'm unlikely to be amused by most romantic stories, especially if the humour is American [and/or involves baby-shit], which is invariably the case... I just can't be doing with that cutesy, smiley, nicey-nicey nonsense!:doh:
The thing is, as Grant has mentioned, I don't watch movies to be 'cheered up' or uplifted, as I'm naturally cheery [lol], so don't need to 'feel better'. That's why overtly jovial, 'happy-clappy' comedies turn me off. I watch films to be entertained, in quite specific ways that I find appealing or exciting [taps into my psyche], which usually involves in some way me feeling shocked/scared and/or emotionally disturbed, during or after the event.
However, I also love a good action or gangster movie, which simply does what it says on the tin, black comedy, or a dark drama, perhaps based on a true story, which doesn't try to be too 'up itself'. There you go... You now know what 'makes me tick', movie-wise, and so which Blu-rays to buy me for Chrimbo!;)
Marco.
P.S 1917 looks cool, so will probably go and see that, along with Harriet.
Went to see Harriet today, I really enjoyed it. I didn't know the story beforehand, but she was quite something. Worth a watch if you like historical true stories. Amazing voice too, which is actually her singing in the film and during the end credits.
Seeing La Belle Époque on Monday Marco. Nearly went today, but it looked too busy.
Heard it was a decent film
I'm expecting to see 'Harriet' next week.
Another film I would like to see is 'Le Mans '66' - surprising really, as I'm about as far from being a petrol head as it gets.
It's a cracking film Barry, seen it twice now. Superb performances from Damon and Bale, great story, superb sets and has something in there for most people - petrol heads or otherwise. The budget was $97 million and they've apparently got 62 of that back already and it's only been out a week!
Most importantly, there's no CGI, the stunts are real not faked, which is a massive bonus.
If anyone hopes to see either Harriet or La Belle Epoque at the cinema, better not daly as it looks like their runs may only be for one week. May not apply in your area, but both are being pushed out by films such as Frozen II, Charlie's Angels, Last Christmas and Knives Out around here?
Joker however is still going, I think it's now in it's 8th week . . . bums on seats I guess, but it is a good film.
I fancy going to see this, as it's lauded as somewhat of a classic... https://www.picturehouses.com/movie-...c19ff&cinema=0
Anyone here seen it?:)
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/xq90/923/rNJE1G.jpg
Marco.
it was in the top 10 on BFI best films, so good enough reason for me to miss it ;) bfi are not my cuppa:lol:
Lol - perhaps not mine either, but I like the Italian angle, and the opening scene is suitably moody/atmospheric to hook me:
https://youtu.be/6TsElhgMeXE
Plus, Claudia Cardinale is rather easy on the eye!;)
Marco.
It's an outstanding film Marco and along with La Dolce Vita, arguably Fellini's best two films.
However, knowing what you normally like I wouldn't bet more than 50p that you'll enjoy it - but you never know? ;)
Well, I'll report back honestly and let you know!:eyebrows:
Marco.
A truly classic film from a classic director. If you like surrealism you should definitely see it.
What’s not to like?
Enjoy
I've seen it, along with most of Fellini's output. If you like 'Art-house' cinema then this is for you, but personally I don't think it to be his best. I prefer 'Amaracord', 'La Strada', 'Juliet of the Spirits' and the afore-mentioned 'La Dolche Vita'.
Going to see this film tomorrow night in Liverpool: https://www.picturehouses.com/movie-...b7270c060d18b8
Trailer:
https://youtu.be/3Lqkfo7IymU
Should be good.. Looking forward to going to the flicks again!:cool:
Marco.
Nice one, Jo. Haven't seen that one, but will check it out, and yes looking forward to 'In the 'Earth'. Doesn't start until 8pm, so we'll probably make a day of it - take Del shopping (mandatory, lol), walk round the docks, then go for a Chinese in Chinatown, few beers in some of the fab old pubs there, and onto the flicks!:cool:
Marco.
Very good - quirky, in some parts scary, with in other parts a touch of rather good black humour, and accompanied with a superb soundtrack... Even got a free poster out of it!:D
Ben Wheatley was actually sitting right in front of us watching the film, as he was there to attend a Q&A session afterwards. Seemed like a good sort. Defo recommended:cool:
Marco.
Soprano's prequel 'The Many Saints of Newark' scheduled to premiere on 2nd October
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Many_Saints_of_Newark
Young Tony Soprano is played by the son of James Gandolfini.
Thanks for the heads up, mate. We're going to see this tomorrow night!:cool:
Just wish they'd bring back another series. Don't see why they couldn't. Just cast James Gandlofini Jr, as the new boss of a new family - and start from there, with any of the old guard, still alive (without walking sticks lol), who survived the end of the original series, in key roles, to add some nostalgia!:D
Marco.
Went to see No Time To Die last Friday - absolutely superb.
THIS.
Holy schmoley this looks good.
https://youtu.be/4yq3TlszZmo
Going to see Dune this evening, looking forward to it :)
July 11th, new Superman movie.
After Zack Snyder's dark dreary Superman with Henry Cavill in the role, this gives me Christopher Reeve Superman '78 vibes, WAY better.
Not been buzzed about a movie like this in a while.
IMAX day 1 for me.
Teaser Trailer:
https://youtu.be/uhUht6vAsMY?si=lhJ8nacDcClkvTqv
Final Trailer (Doesn't give any major Plot Spoilers)
https://youtu.be/Ox8ZLF6cGM0?si=QFgyLmjzQO_vp--f
Saw last mission impossible at the weekend, good action sequences but overly long, I fell asleep.
The TV show was never up to much either. The self-destructing tape, that was it.
Superman was awesome, the best since Richard Donner's Superman 2.
Saw in IMAX as well, picked my usual smack bang in the middle of the screen seat as well, so all was right with the world. :)
Instant 4K Bluray purchase on release.
Really enjoy James Gunn's take over Zack Snyder's DC Moovie-verse.
Superman is a universal concept: He's us at our best - it adapts for the Times - but that Film just was Ego stuff.
I enjoyed Man of Steel though... as it was the Studio's first take on it, and not the 12th take on the same thing. It was new.
Its folks flying about with Superpowers after all?
Not a Wagnerian existential examination of Mans place in the Universe and...whatever all else that other stuff was (smashing your two action figures together Pew! Pew!)
That had been done to death in the comics in the 90s, and (in my opinion) where it should have died.
Anyhoo, talk about a movies tone being all over the place? :scratch:
Superman 2025 was a fresh take, a comic book literally brought to life.
As a Superman comic fan since I was a Kid, my inner 10 year old was beaming in the Cinema.
Rumour is James Gunn's next Superman project is Kingdom Come, a huge deal if you know that book.
Speaking of comic books brought to life, saw this last night?
https://youtu.be/pAsmrKyMqaA?si=HigN3j6uv9jC9cGK
Big fan (again) of the Fantastic 4 comics as a Kid,
this was Jack Kirby's drawings brought to life.
The 60's style "future retro" set design and vintage Cinematography (think Kubrik's 2001) is worth the ticket alone.
Loved it.
These kinds of movies work better when taken as "fantastic" stories in THEIR worlds, and not trying to bring Men in spandex into OUR world?
Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight trilogy was lightning in a bottle (and got found out by the third Movie) but aside that nothing else really works as well?
Sam Raimi knew the formula before Nolan's movies with his Spiderman trilogy.
The better MCU movies (Usually the Captain America ones) as the "tone" was right kinda got there, but fell off when they went weird and (not so) wonderful.
Glad the cycle's rebooted again.
Catch F4 after the Cinema run if you need to, its a great movie.
I found the transfer of American comic book "action heros" to be disappointing. For me the biggest disappointments were the movie adaptation of 'The Fantastic Four', and even worse was the adaptation of 'The Green Lantern'.
I would be interested in a sequel to The Fantastic Four, but new films based on the characters of Superman or Batman don't fill me with much enthusiasm.
Spinal Tap II: The End Continues
Finally got round to going to see this.
It's okay, has a few moments. Not remotely as funny as the original but that was a very high bar to top.
As usual with these things they don't really get what it was that made the original one so good. And my favourite character (Bobbi Fleckman) only has one very short scene, likewise Artie Fufkin.
Sequels are rarely, if ever, as good as the original.
How would you rate it - 4 out of 11?
Maybe a '5' but that's a bit unfair as the original is one of those things that gets funnier the more times you see it so might be true of this one also.
I think there's a lot of potentially funny things they could have done but didn't. Like bring in some of the former band members who are only mentioned in the first one - Ross McLochness or Denny Pudding.
I think the key to the original is that many of the situations, whilst ridiculous, are still believable in the context - like getting lost on the way to the stage. This one starts a bit too over the top with Nigel's Cheese & Guitar shop - and it doesn't get better from there.
There were a lot of funny scenes in the original: the group getting hyped-up for their entrance and then getting lost on the way to the stage; the "up to 11, that's one more"; the stage act where the members of the group emerge from a chrysalis, except the bassist because his won't open until the end, and of course the pyramid prop whose dimensions are in inches rather than feet.
:sofa: I've never seen Spinal Tap
I’ve never seen it either…. Is there room for two behind that sofa, Steve? (Shuffles off to see if it is available on the myriad of streaming services he pays for but doesn’t use…)
Big one for me,
One of my favourites,
https://images2.imgbox.com/c7/4c/YIECn4ao_o.jpg
Never seen it in the Cinema.never mind a 4K Remaster in IMAX.
Ticket booked for next Month, will blow my tiny mind Im sure.