Interestingly, amp damping factor is considered to be irrelevant driving planar magnetic speakers. And planar magnetic headphones. Just thought I'd say. I have an amp with variable DF, and I can't really hear a difference on the Apogees.
Printable View
What you need is the Jez Arkless buffer between passive pre and power amp. ;)
He made me one, if you recall, and it works fab, but not needed in my current setup.
Jez reckoned the buffer would be in its element in this situation.
Happy to loan it to you to try out, Martin.
The buffer won’t add any gain though, and that Krell has low gain / low input sensitivity. As a comparison my amp has 0.8v input sensitivity and 33db gain, which on paper is a better match for passive or unity gain active (buffer) preamps.
Ah, I had no idea how the buffer thingy Jerry was recommending works, so that's out then. But Dunc's observation is right, so Martin needs to hear the Krell with an active preamp, to hear what he might be missing, and also his existing passive pre with a different power amp.
Marco.
https://www.ebay.com/p/12-Tall-Roll-...d=132227131178
If the mass of that cone in a cheap sub is typical at 140g, and the Apogee bass panel is equivalent to 3 of them, which it is supposed to be, we have 420g versus 46g i.e. a factor of ten lighter.
More of a difference than I appreciated as the foil/kapton/glue mix doesn't feel light. The bass panel's mass will be beyond that of a mylar only panel, but they just can't do substantial dynamic deep bass in ESL designs.