It looks better in the second photo:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex_UK
Printable View
It looks better in the second photo:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex_UK
How old is it? I suppose you don't know. Quite a classy watch.
1997 according to the seller. Part of the problem is the camera on my phone is so good it shows up the imperfections, you really can’t see them in normal wear.Quote:
Originally Posted by Macca
They're not imperfections, they're character.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex_UK
Although to paraphrase LKJ Setright 'It's for the owner to have character, not the watch.'
Submariner “homage” for £9.49 from Amazon delivered, anyone?
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...d9031e4ff0.jpg
How can they do it for that price, must cost that to transport it from China! For the cost, it is amazingly good!
Don’t wear it to dive with Alex [emoji6]Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex_UK
You don't wear it to dive with Alex? You guys kept that hobby secret...Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy S
Earlier this week I bought a Scarab necklace for one of my Grandchildren. She has a part in her school play and had no idea what a Scarab is, now she knows. Thing is, it cost me £4.90 and arrived within 2 days. How do they do that ? Just for me to post a Jiffy bag would cost that.
Quite like that one - but IMO it would look better with a concentric sweep second hand.Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy S