Fair enough. In that case, I won't report you to the mods.
Printable View
Fair enough. In that case, I won't report you to the mods.
Pheew... Thanks! :D
Marco.
You dodged a bullet there, Marco ;)
Lol... The delusions of Mr Dunn are getting even better:
I've not been in contact with DC for well over a year (or more, I'd need to check), so that doesn't count. We're talking about RECENT emails I've sent, which are supposed to prove that I haven't changed, in terms of my threatening behaviour. Furthermore, anyone that's read the relevant threads on AoS, and also knows what went on behind the scenes, knows exactly why DC received the (justified) treatment he did.Quote:
One of those with a similar inbox is a member here in Dave Cawley, who he tried to commercially assassinate...
I also haven't been in contact with Steve Toy, for well over a year.
Ha - that's truly hilarious, complete nonsense, and simply what YOU would like to believe. If anyone's interested in the truth of the matter, simply contact any of the mods here, who at the time were directly involved in the situation, and they'll gladly provide it.Quote:
...and the other his ex partner in the forum Steve Toy who he tricked and manipulated off so he could have all the perceived power for himself.
More nonsense and simply what you've made up in your head, based on the scantest of information. A classic case of putting two and two together and coming up with six! :mental:Quote:
So he managed to ban one of the founders of his AoS as soon as he bought him out for a pittance - one sick little man.
Again, we enter the realms of another fable. Honestly, if anyone's remotely interested in knowing the truth about any of these matters, it can very easily be proved.Quote:
Then there is the other founder partner Filterlab who doesn't seem to want to or maybe dare post again.
Marco.
He doesn't know when to give up, does he?
So, Richard, you're simply taking one person's side of a dispute as gospel? You can be really stupid sometimes. Naturally, Steve's Toy's version of events is going to be heavily biased towards Steve Toy! (To suit his own agenda at the time).Quote:
Edit:- again due to comments. The information about what happened to Steve Toy came from Steve Toy. Why do you think he is so angry at not being able to reverse the ban.
Don't get a job as a Police interviewer because you'll never solve any crimes! :D
Incidentally, in reference to Daniel Quinn's remarks here:
That's fine, so I'll discount this one below then, which you sent me, after I sent you proof of how I legitimately obtained your email addess:Quote:
Il Duce please stop sending me private emails, I've deleted the last 2 or 3 without reading, I cant remember the precise figure. I will not respond privately ever.
;)Quote:
p.s. it was never personal Marco , you are aware of my distinction between online persona and real person . You do what you do and i'll do what i do , but i am happy to accept the real you is a far more rounded personality and in many respects we are similar passionate no it alls , what we know just differs . Also if you were bland it would'nt be worth it , but im sure you know this already .
regards
Dennis
You really ought to make up your mind what your position is regarding me. Based on the above, and your recently conflicting remarks on RD's forum, all it proves is that you are nothing but a two-faced lying troll, intent on causing as much conflict as possible, in order to 'amuse' yourself - and this from a supposed solicitor??
I wonder what your law firm would think if they seen how you conduct yourself on the Internet and the kind of juvenile banality you get up to in your free time when still representing your profession? Maybe someone should contact them and show them?
Marco.
What "idiocy" is that then, Richard? You mean the kind of idiocy that would cause someone to conveniently only believe one side of a dispute?? (I'm referring here to Steve Toy). Clearly, only a blinkered idiot would not take into consideration that there are always two sides to every story! ;)Quote:
This is getting even funnier (if that were possible) the more he posts the further into the hole of idiocy he digs himself.
Also, you may wish to speak again with Steve, as I'm sure he'll give you a rather different version of events now that he's calmed down (as I have) and getting on with his life.
Anyway, have you finished making a fool of yourself yet, as Del's calling me for lunch?
Marco.
This is getting boring and has nothing to do with hifi. Some pages back I read that this had been put to bed only to resurface as another avenue of bitching.
Here's an idea - if you can't find something positive to say about someone - say nothing at all :)
All this isn't just confined to Marco though, although he is the one posting here recently. A good few of "us" and the forum itself have been subject to continued jibes going back a fair old while and, I believe, while the jibing and jealousy continues on the other forum with no sensible way of responding there, then I feel this should continue, but possibly under a different thread title, leaving the "normal" forum to continue.
This being the Internet, no-one will have the last word, ever, so unless one or other party gives it a rest, the argument will continue ad infinitum.Quote:
Originally Posted by DSJR
Not that I'm complaining; all this handbags at dawn stuff is far more interesting than discussions like 'will amplifier A work with speaker B?' or 'is analogue better than digital?'.
Hi Robin,
You're absolutely right, and such bitching is alien to the usual friendly atmosphere on AoS, so I apologise.Quote:
This is getting boring and has nothing to do with hifi. Some pages back I read that this had been put to bed only to resurface as another avenue of bitching.
Clearly, Richard thrives on the attention and has got nothing else better to do with his time, so I'll bow out now, having made my point very clearly, and lock the thread, allowing his illiterate side-kick 'solicitor' and him to have the last (no doubt) many words on his dead-end 'forum', where I'm sure that they'll continue having fun talking to themselves!
Dave, any sensible and unbiased person can differentiate reality from the blinkered and surreal version of such inside RD's head, so worry not my friend, and leave him to his delusions ;)
I'll end with stating that if anyone wants evidence of how I've genuinely changed since the days of The Crossover Network, then they only have to examine my behaviour here on this thread towards the keyboard warrior that is Richard Dunn, which has been calm, dignified and purposeful, despite the severest of provocation from him on his 'forum' - a far cry from how I would've reacted in the bad old days!
Like I said before, some of us can change for the better and learn from our mistakes, whereas Richard Dunn will always be a joyless, lonely, ill-tempered and intolerant old man...
Over and out, chaps :)
Marco.