Was just thinking about Fletcher-Munson and so forth. I/e what measures flat does not sound flat, a house curve sounds flat.
Printable View
Was just thinking about Fletcher-Munson and so forth. I/e what measures flat does not sound flat, a house curve sounds flat.
Thought so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Macca
I've just spent hours messing with digital EQ and a test mic and tried to implement in the crossover what I thought needed to be done.
What makes.me think what I have is about right is whenever I apply EQ over different tracks on a average the response I have in the actual crossover is about the best I can do.
It's a digital active x-over? I'm sure you've said before but I can't remember. Anyway what's right is what works for you, as always.
No.Quote:
Originally Posted by Macca
It's is far cheaper. In fact it is free. Equaliser APO and the Peace GUI.
Highly recommended thought I do wonder how good the maths is in the filters.
Need a full digital active set up if you are going to get EQ to work properly I suspect. Maybe a bridge too far.
Experiments with DIRAC adversely effected SQ too so it's put me off the idea of dumping cash on it.
BTW if any members want to listen PM me. I might let you in LOL.
New speakers for my 2nd system.
https://i.imgur.com/pPG1Ccj.jpg
Infinity Cascade Model Nine.
Review
... 'From the outset, the Cascades impress with two characteristics: stunning clarity and terrific surround sound imaging. You’ll notice the speaker’s clarity every time you put on music recordings or soundtracks that are rich in textural details, or that combine multiple complex voices or sound effects.'
I can't disagree with that; really excellent clarity and image focus.
They only go down to about 70hz and are meant to be used with a subwoofer. I am using a Jamo sub200 - 200W and an 8 inch driver, it works well.
Do they have a connection for a sub or do you just wire the sub up in parallel
Wow, very different design so would expect something different on the sonics front.
Are they hard to drive?