Fantastic :thumbsup::thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by AJSki2fly
Fantastic :thumbsup::thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by AJSki2fly
Thumbs up from me as well, and also for the Edgar Froese album.
It was his birthday yesterday, he would have been 80.Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry
I never said anything to the contrary as far as I was aware - I was referring to the price of the albums and people having to pay that kind of money due to greedy businesses exploiting vinyls popularity. It's a free right of everyone in this country to buy what they like and spend any amount they want,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, even in an exploitative situation (even though it's a case of pay or go away)!!!!! Have a nice day..Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry
This is more or less a repeat of my post # 30025, save you have used ellipsis where I used "but". Thus when asked if it is stupid, my reply was "No it's not".Quote:
Originally Posted by Us-&-Them
Thanks for invitation to 'have a nice day' - I did.
Back to the business of spinning today... (sort of):)
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/..._QL70_ML2_.jpg
I will have paid about 6 quid for this in 1985, which in today's money is about £22. So not much difference there. It's the bargain price of CDs today that makes vinyl look bad. That's not to say that some sellers aren't taking the piss - I was shocked to find last year that HMV were asking £50 for Bowie's "Young Americans". And it ain't even a double :(