Alfie,
Quote:
I've heard a couple of modified 1210's one of them being yours! Albeit at the Pieshow & not in its normal surroundings & was very impressed! & no doubt sounds even better in your listening room!
Nice one, although I don't remember. Did you introduce yourself? :cool:
Quote:
But on the day of the Pieshow tbh i prefered Coco's Sp10 & Beoblokes 301 & quite fancy the challenge of rebuilding one to work with my FR64s.
That's cool and I can understand that, but it's very difficult to analyse what impact the T/T was having in those systems you mention and separate it from the sonic signature imposed by the partnering electronics and speakers - especially at a show. It is entirely possible that it was the overall effect of the latter you preferred more than the former, particularly considering how different the gear was to what we were using in our room ;)
Quote:
The high effective mass of the arm will limit my choice of cart to either an SPU, Shelter, 103sa or something similar. If the systemdek proves to be good enough not to limit the performace of one of the said carts, i may well stay with it until swapping arm/cart on to the fettled sp10/301/401.
I would live with the Systemdek at the moment, as switching to the likes of a Gyrodek would be more of a side-grade than an upgrade, IMO.
Incidentally, your FR64 would also be a great match for a Shure M3D. Trust me, you should include this veritable classic in your cartridge shortlist as it is utterly superb in the right set-up. Your FR64 and an SP10 or Garrard would be ideal. Steve (sps) here uses one to great effect on his FR/TD124 combo, as do I on my 1210. Have a read at my thread on the M3D elsewhere :)
Quote:
I'm also not so sure all belt drives are as severely hampered as you say. Some well implemented belt drives still sound pretty good to me & i've heard some not so good DD tables. Theres good & bad examples of both designs!
Oh I completely agree - I should have explained myself better. What I meant was that, IMO, 'low-mass' belt-drive T/Ts, such as your Systemdek (sorry!) and the likes of the Gyro you mentioned, are fundamentally hampered by their use of 'rubber bands' (and low-torque motor units, in comparison to that used on SP10s and the like) such that 'dynamic wow' is a significant problem. It's to do with speed stability, and for me belt-drive T/Ts only get it right in that area when going down the high-mass route, such as the Kuzma here and other similar examples on the market:
http://www.stereophile.com/turntables/407kuzma/
It takes that amount of mass and engineering to properly solve the speed stability issues of belt-driven T/Ts, whereas with direct-drive or idler the problem is tackled in a much more 'elegant', less bulky package. Low-mass belt-driven T/Ts such as I have mentioned, and the likes of Linns and Regas, warble and waver all over the place in comparison, and unfortunately my ears are attuned to picking up on this annoying trait such that it does my head in within five minutes of listening to it!
Quote:
I'm not arguing that the systemdek is a good implementation by the way & have said how impressed i was with the 1210's. I just fancy an older deck to play with DD or idler, but if money was no problem i would be looking at a TW Raven!
No worries whatsoever - I completely understand the attraction and satisfaction of fettling an older T/T, so I wish you all the best with your forthcoming project. I'm sure that it will be much fun :gig:
Marco.
P.S Guy, I'm with ya!