Yup, says the quiet part out loud.
Now we're getting somewhere... So you agree then that there's *some* merit in the theory?
The BIG point, however in that respect, which everyone's missing, is that it wouldn't be "1984 a little late", in the sense that the plan has just recently been dreamed up and happening now..
It would be "late" simply in the sense that small (but significantly incremental) steps have successfully been taken for YEARS, by the 'powers that be', as a build up to what could now be about to happen (some steps foiled in the past, simply by fate and/or the successful intervention of good over evil, which perhaps is why the process has been delayed), and so now we're simply seeing (or about to see) the fruition of those small steps having successfully been taken, and subsequently a significantly FURTHER, this time BIG step taken, in terms of how this pandemic has been deliberately manipulated, to achieve their ultimate goal: the creation of a New World Order.
The point being, just to be clear, is that I believe lots of things have been happening covertly in the background for a very long time in the build up to all of this - it's not just something that's happened 'out of the blue' or dreamed up last week!
Anyway, as you say, time will tell what will happen, and as I said before, never in my whole life have I EVER wanted MORE to be wrong!!
Marco.
Robert Maxwell was another insecure psychopathic nut with too much power and money and thinking back, seemed very similar to Trump.
mostly the types that get that money and power are driven people, who when they make it have to strive further, and then to try and enforce their will on pretty much everyone. hearst was one, and im guessing murdoch too... it seems to run in the comunications business
I don't trust in anything implicitly, except as a practising Christian, in God. What I'm referring to is based on the results of my research into the matter, and in considering/analysing the information I was presented with, which as I've said I'm not willing to go into now.
Dismiss that as "crazy" if you wish, as that is your prerogative.
Marco.
ive not seen any concretye evidence of that as yet/ just witch hunts, although there is often fire behind smoke
Why would you hope to find 'concrete evidence' of something that occurs covertly? That would somewhat defeat the purpose, no? The 'concrete evidence' would only exist when what's happening no longer needs hidden - and then you can worry!;)
Besides, if you need 'concrete evidence' for everything before you even begin questioning it [not necessarily believing in it], then there will be many things in life that may exist, but which you simply won't see... There's a quote to conjure with!
Marco.
P.S And regardless, BG still fits your earlier description for Hearst (and also Murdoch) perfectly. There is little doubt about that, or about his, shall we say, 'questionable interest' in vaccines.