Leasing is the future of new cars,.. It's getting that buying a car is going to be a handicap
Printable View
Leasing is the future of new cars,.. It's getting that buying a car is going to be a handicap
The CHR is a fantastic car in every way, personally i'd have one over a Civic any day of the week.
In all the time i worked for Toyota/Lexus we changed a handful of batteries and none were charged for, not even for the first gen imported prius with no service history. Really not something to worry about.
If a car looks good and makes you feel good driving it, then buy it.
Nothing better than opening the curtains in the morning and looking at a car that makes you smile, rather than looking at a dreary pile of shite that may or not save a polar bear from starving.
Thats very true. PCP is a great way of having a new car every say 2-3 years with no worry of the thing going wrong and if it does, then warranty will cover it.
We, as a nation seem obsessed with "owning" a car.
Yes, PCP is dead money, but so is depreciation from buying one.
If we got a car on lease, I would be dreading the "give it back" time. When they saw the 45,000 miles on the clock they would pull down Anita's pants and give her a right spanking (financially of course). Be ok if we only did Grant-size mileages, but I walk further than that in a year, and I don't walk anywhere.
Think I get 20k a year allowance
We've done 110,000 miles in 7 years in the Civic, so we should be ok then :)
The over mileage isn't horrendous unless it's silly over. Mine is with motability. Might not be cheapest way but its easy and everything is done for u. Only costs are petrol really. I'm averaging 60mpg but can get more if I want it. That's fine for me as my driving is mostly town.
And yes it's a pleasure to look at and drive. Plus via motability I got the hoist for my scooter in boot.
My experience of main dealers is that they are manufacturer licenced con artists
Toyota main dealer did recall work on my wife's Auris and also carried out a "health check" on the car which was handed back to me without comment.
On arriving home I received an email from them stating that my car had a "red light" from the health check, this was described as a fault that "was an mot failure and may make the car unsafe to drive" on contacting Motor line Toyota I was told that this "dangerous fault" was low aircon refrigeratorant.
When my wife took our Astra to Drive Vauxhall they called her at work advising her that the car needed two new tyres as they were below the legal limit . I called them asking how how far they had driven as the tyres in question were 2 weeks old, they apologised and claimed they got the job sheet mixed up with another car.
Dovercourt VW had my brother in laws Golf in to replace a damaged exhaust valve (obviously head off job) under warranty they advised him to have the cambelt changed at the same time and then tried to charge him 4 hours labour to fit the belt which had been removed anyway, apparently it takes 4 hours to open the box containing the new belt.
According to Saab's dealer software (now freely available since they went bust) they charge 3 hours per side to change the front shocks on a 9-3, I can do both sides in 3 hours on my drive with no air tools.
Sure some will try it on. But do do independents.
That's not uncommon.
When the 2nd gen Auris came out there were a few faults and as such they needed reporting, but we were not allowed to repair them before staff from the factory inspected the failed items.
In one case it took two of them almost a day to do something we could have done in an hour or less. The fact that we were ripping the piss out of them probably didnt help, but the problem is that these people set the FRT's (flat rate times) that the dealers charge.
That said, most places i've worked charge by "time taken" rather than FRT's. Which is a lot more fair and honest.