What makes you say this Marco:scratch: How its litz posh:scratch::scratch:
Printable View
Lol, daftee... Not 'posher' than the SPD-4 (what you have), but 'posher' than the less expensive 428 Phono Litz cable... Do keep up! :D
;)
Marco.
Dude, its only 10.19 but i'm shattered I've had a very busy day today so keeping up with this thread after 20 pages of posts is frying my noodles! The SPD-4 IS better than the TYR but its difficult to seperate the improvements on my system because I got the SR7XL two days before the tonearm cable arrived. Thats why i've not written a super-dooper report on the cable, SORRY BOYS;)
I'm a bit confused now! Who has exactly what?
Lol... I have 428 Phono Litz, with standard plugs, priced at £124. I'm waiting on a 432.5 Phono Litz, priced at £210 (plus extra for 'posh plugs') arriving any day now, and also an SPD-4 (the same as Andy's), priced at £440, arriving in around a week.
All of the above will eventually be compared with the £450 Furutech AG-12, which I'm currently using.
I trust that this clears up the confusion? :)
Marco.
So...what's the difference between the 428, 432.5 and SPD-4 (appart from £316)?
Matey, you need to scroll back and read the last few pages of the thread properly - all the info is in there (and links supplied by Yannis, which explain the different construction of the cables in question) :)
Marco.
P.S it's 428, incidentally, not 482. The 428 and 423.5 numerically define the difference in conductor thickness, used in both cables.
Actually, I have read back through the posts quite a way (a few times) - the info line isn't very linear though and there is quite a lot of unrelated chat.
Doesn't matter though.
It never is on forums...Quote:
Actually, I have read back through the posts quite a way (a few times) - the info line isn't very linear though...
See my post #203 (and the links therein) here: http://theartofsound.net/forum/showp...&postcount=203
All is explained in there :)
Marco.
Ah yes, that clarifies things :) Cheers.