That's an odd assertion. Why would an SSD be any better than a standard hard drive? Or an optical drive?
Printable View
That's an odd assertion. Why would an SSD be any better than a standard hard drive? Or an optical drive?
roon say music on an ext hdd is fine but program and the os should be on a ssd. thats how i run mine. tbh ssd's the size i need would cost a fortune. i dont really see why a ssd would be better as an ext drive. speed isnt really an issue as usb3 is fast enough
Still very much a cd & cdp user, I don't see my 2 box Lector CDP7TL going anywhere, and have not heard anything yet that comes close for digital replay. Also it having a valve output stage has meant I have been able to take it further by swapping out the ECC81 JJs and subsequent EH Triple mica for a pair of TELEFUNKEN, now the TFKs are something special in the Lector bringing it much closer to my Bardo/Conqueror/Hana ML tt combo.
This indeed. HDs are donkey's years old and SSDs have replaced them with far more advantages and few drawbacks.
I know - simply gorgeous. I almost bought one last night, and I only have four CDs (which I ripped to my server as soon as I got them :lol:).
The amount of vibration from a hard drive is quite massive; all sorts of damping methods are used in computers to counteract it. Can't be good for replay in any system, and the noise - both electrical and physical, must bring negatives as well.
SSDs in everything for me. :)
this year alone marantz have bought out 2 midrange Cd players , project has a new Cd transport , companies are still bringing them out so there must be a market