In that case if his actions are supposedly 'mad', then what does that make practically every US intervention in the Middle East since WW2. Take Iraq and Libya, two dictatorships, but the US turned them into failed states.
Printable View
Being "mad" doesn't exclude one from pursuing a "career in extortion, corruption and self aggrandisement" neither does being a politician exclude madmen/women".
I would tend to agree with your point about any intervention in another country since WW2 (by any other country/countries) - it doesn't stop with the Middle East, just think Afghanistan, Tibet etc. Only one that I can think of as being justified, off the top of my head, would be the former Yugoslavia.
I think that what makes Putin different and therefore being referred to as "mad" is his willingness to make veiled threats about the use of nuclear weapons.
I don't know, the US rains shit upon the middle east for decades, getting rid of dictators with the promise of democracy, which never comes, only chaos and destruction, Iraq, Libya, even the 20 yr occupation of Afghanistan couldn't establish democracy or any sort of functioning state, as soon as they depart, the Taliban just steps in. It seems once this chaos comes close to home, we take more notice. Russia of course also occupied Afghanistan, in an even more bonkers project, to turn the natives into communists, but they just ended up torching entire villages! How either country think they have right to do this is beyond me. Putin is no 'madder' than Kissinger, Bush, the Clintons, whoever. Was there ever a point in post war US history that the US weren't involved in the Middle east? What does Ukraine for Putin, partly the same thing the Middle East held for the US, mineral reserves, and a strategic defence position against encroaching Nato membership.
there were major differences tho. no matter the russians upset at nato too close for their comfort, their attack on a no military country just because they fancy it back isnt on, especially with their indiscriminate shellings.
West gets involved in the Middle East because of the oil, not because they're crazy.
Don't buy the idea that Putin/Russians are worried about NATO. As if NATO would ever invade Russia. It's strictly a defensive alliance. Plus Russia has nuclear weapons in any case so they're untouchable.
If they were in the slightest bit worried about NATO attacking them they wouldn't have gone into Ukraine would they?
Not really possible to equate threats of nuclear weapons use to being "closer to home", ballistic missiles make everyone an interested party/potential victim.
I want to be clear though, "western" interventions in the Middle East have been ridiculous and solve nothing. As for treatment of Palestinians by Israel and backed by US, well that is atrocious.
well 1990 was about liberating Kuwait (well their oil anyway) and 2004 was about taking control of the world's second largest oil reserve away from a loose cannon.
Given oil is absolutely fundamental to our civilisation that's not a crazy thing to do. Whether it's 'right' or not is a whole different argument.
Nobody would give a toss what they were doing in the middle east if it wasn't for the oil. They'd be left to their own devices. A Kurdish bloke said to me 'We will never have peace as long as there is oil.'
I think you are right - very interesting program on "Yesterday" earlier this evening. Covered the Caucus oil fields from time of WW2, effectively for many years Rusia/controlled the distribution of oil to satellite States at prices way below worldwide rates. Once satellite states became dependant on the oil supplies they were effectively "over a barrel" and had to toe the party line.
TBH Macca, I'd say the death of over 100,000 civilians in the first Iraq/US war was pretty crazy, getting rid of Saddam and Gadaffi was pretty crazy, seeing as the result of that was to create chaos, into which stepped extremists. Almost every US military intervention creates instability, but they keep on doing it, again and again! With Vietnam being the reference, they just bombed the shit out of that country, people need to get a perspective on the US, they are war mongering bastards, the only country to ever use that disgusting weapon, the h bomb.
As far as I can understand, Russia views Nato on its doorstep as a humiliation, but also I believe a direct threat. Ukraine has large reserves of oil and gas as well, and is a strategic defence position.
Can't go out to get dinner as expecting a delivery and of course the second I leave the house and disappear around the corner they will attempt to deliver.
So forced to ransack the emergency rations and have a pot noodle. Desperate stuff.
Yes. If I'm working and nip to the bathroom I can pretty much guarantee that the phone will ring even though it hasn't rung once for the previous 4 hours while I have been sat there and can pick it up right away.
And if you rush back it is absolutely guaranteed they will ring off in the split second before you pick up.
interesting thing. watching star trek insurrection and picard started singing gilbert and sullivan's hms pinifore to data. just after the boy phoned and out of blue i said, thats good eatin'.. now i found out that that was said by grandpa simpson in cape feare episode, in which sideshow bob sang hms pinifore to bart..
aint it amazing how the brain connects things without you realising.:eek:
it was an episode the writers thought would end the run of the simpsons as well. they didnt like it at time and the classic extended rake stepping was done as long as a filler as they had run out of ideas. i think it was one of the top 10 eps..
clessic simpsons of the early mid series'. not seen many for years as i dont have telly
I still have loads of the old ones on video cassette. My old man had cable installed the first day it became available so he used to tape them and post the tapes to me.
They still show them sometimes on Channel 4 and Sky. Any episodes made after about 1999 aren't worth watching though.
'catch up' on Channel 4 website https://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-simpsons
No old ones on there right now but they'll start showing them again, I'll let you know when they do.
Managed to fix the hoover and now it works fine. Major achievement for me that is.
What did you do - renew or empty the bag? ;)
No suction, thought it might be the filters, pulled them out and then could see the whole tube was blocked.
I don't know what it was I must have hoovered up, some plastic/metal thing which had jammed at the top just before the filter. Got that out and all the crud that had built up behind it and it works fine again now.
I have nothing but admiration for those who have a grasp of technology, especially when it is self-taught :respect: Just think, when you retire you could start up a small business, coming to the rescue of folk who never thought to check for a blockage :ner::ner: Possibly including us, Mrs P has amassed an impressive collection of hoovers none of which "work right".
I trust the plastic/metal thing was nothing important.
about 85% of hoover issues are blockages of some sort. older ones especially were fairly easy to work with too. you could pick up 'broken' hoovers all time for pennies and fix up, quick paint, new outer bag, cable, brushes and make a good living on the side.
I make frequent trips to our 'reclamation centre' to dispense of stuff I no longer need (you know the sort of thing: LPs; reel-to-reel recorders, etc. - nah only kidding!).
It always surprises me just how many Dyson vacuum cleaners there are there.
They sold a lot of them, that's why. I've got two of them plus an Electrolux and a Shark. Did have a VAX too but gave that to the tat man.
dyson yellows blocked up worse than most due to design at base. used to pick up loads for free as folk obviously thought they were goosed. not really any different tho to most hoovers. just a lot of press bull about being great etc.
And a great price too (i.e. expensive). And what is so great about not having a bag?
Henrys are good too. I had to use the one at work once when the shredder went skitz on me.
I always wanted the one that will suck up builder's rubble.
For work I have a budget Henry-type hoover, made by Titan and sells at Screwfix for forty quid. Works a treat, but does use bags (about a tenner for 5, also sold at Screwfix). The bags do last a long time though.
If you stick the hose in t'other hole it blows like a good 'un, which may be handy for something.
That Aviva advert where they're struggling to cross a little stream that is about an inch deep and the old girl looks so scared you'd think she was transversing Niagara Falls on a tightrope.
'Arc light. B52 strike. Charlie don't see 'em or hear 'em.'
Why do I keep on thinking about Dr Strangelove :eek:
I had thought of watching it again on Netflix. Doesn't seem to be available in UK though:(
'Secret Army' just starting on Talking Pictures. Not seen that since it was originally broadcast, can't forget the theme tune.
Never watched it, thought it was dead boring. I remember it because it was always on Wednesday nights in the winter, back when there was only three channels and there would be nothing worth watching on the other two either. One of those scheduling dead zones. That theme tune was the signal that I had to go and do my homework. I always tried to fit it in around the telly.