Printable View
Greetings all
Thought i would throw this one into the mix
with the advent of dsp room correction, having a couple of velodyne dd15 delivered soon, and also reading thru reviews of the latest dsp room correction devices, any opinions on which will be the winner
seems like a digital correction is a lot cleaner install, than all those non wife approved bulky room traps
any opinions?
regards
Kurt
For my money (and this is free), I'd say the finest acoustic treatment is experimentation. Listen, jiggle, listen, move furniture, listen, close the curtains, listen, have a ciggy, listen, fiddle etc etc.
I've found some really great positioning techniques this way. Of course it helps that my listening room doesn't have parallel walls (house built 1850) but just by moving furniture the room can really be deadened.
Having said that I've never tried a DSP but I would consider that to be adding components into the chain and therefore (potentially) degrading the sound by means of straying further from the original signal.
On the other hand, with AV it practically invites itself. :)
I have spent a long time looking into the benefits of room correction and acoutic treatment and currently own a Tact 2.2x. I find many of these room correction devices take away the magic of music and much prefer to perform the final tweeking in the cross-over and in the listening room where room measurements are taken and either the amount of internal wadding adjusted or the tweeter level adjusted to suit the room. I appreciate hardly any-one has this facility how-ever it's the only real way of identifying some problems, especially with dry rooms.
Over the years different companies have expended vast amounts of money on research into room equalisation. All of it showed that you can't correct a room problem by altering the amplitude response of the source, in this case your hi fi.
When you listen to a sound emanating from anything in a room, the first thing you hear is the direct sound travelling straight to you. Its SPL drops by 6dB each time you double the distance from it.
Next you hear early reflections, which comprise of sounds bouncing off reflective surfaces and arriving a little later than the first arrival.
And finally you heat the reverberent energy as the sound reflects backwards and forwards around the room. RT time defines how long it takes to drop by 60dB. As long as there is sound exciting it, the level stays the same everywhere.
Despite the fact that the direct sound may be less loud than the reverberent energy because of the distance you are from it, you still hear it first and make your critical judgement from it. Therefore if you alter it, things won't sound right. It's blindingly obvious when you think about it, but that hasn't stopped experts from wasting a fortune.
There are Acousticians around who measure rooms and recommend treatment if there is a problem. Typically, if the RT time of high frequencies is longer than all the others, you're system will sound bright, and so on. This can be measured and fixed.
Most of us probably will have reasonable rooms without realising that we've filled them with furniture so that they are pleasant to relax and talk in and that it helps the hi fi as well.
Bass isn't usually a problem either because not all the walls are necessarily solid and there are doors and windows.
And we tend to buy small speakers that probably won't excite room resonances.
Years ago when I was at ATC, we sold a pair of SCM200's to the BBC which were mounted about half way between the floor and the ceiling and the same distance from the back wall; the result was a total absence of Bass. Measuring them showed a huge boost at 35Hz and nothing at 70Hz and if any equalisation was applied 35 Hz got Louder and 70Hz quieter and altering it digitally wouldn't have made a scrap of difference. Putting the speakers in the wall cured the problem along with suitable traps. Most of you won't have 4 x 12" bass drivers with 700 wpc so needn't worry.
I hope this helps.
Filterlab's advice is the best.
I tried EQ, TAG TMREQ and Krell processor simpler equalizer...
It appears to sound better in the begining, but it "kills" the music, I always ended up switching it off...
Adequate speakers, well positioned, some care with furniture and wall covering, and bass management with a reasonable subwoofer, will be enough for very good results...
From The Grave
TubeTraps, as I've recommended elsewhere. A natural room treatment setup is going to beat any digital room correction system, however good it is. I want my analogue signals to remain analogue!
http://www.acousticsciences.com/
They really work. I use four TubeTraps, three PicturePanels and a SubTrap in my room.
Believe filterlabs advice. Forget room treatment stuff, move furniture and speakers around and don't forget to look at where you sit. Make sure both speakers are the same distance from you and you are exactly inbetween them !
I've got a lot of time for this bloke's take on things http://www.getbettersound.com/speakout.html
It's fine for that to be your opinion, but you have directly contradicted a posting and recommendation I made just above. I have and use room treatment - what brand and types do you have experience of?Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog
As a qualified acoustician, I can comment here. In the first instance, moving the listening position and furnishings around, sensible use of natural diffusers like bookcases etc, adjusting the listening position etc are all free and will tell you if you really have a residual problem that requires investment in physical room treatments or in DSP. It may be that bass traps etc are the answer, but to be effective, bass traps in particular must be quite large (the laws of physics dictate this) - something that does not necessarily sit well in smaller British rooms. It is very common for audiophiles to get hung up on room modes and their effects, but if the listening position corresponds to a maximum amplitude part of a standing wave, simply moving to one side will usually be rather more effective than trying to absorb enough (bass energy) to balance the overall sound properly.
Unlike Martin, I would not be dismissive of digital room correction techniques, which can be spectacularly successful if not asked to work too hard; however by the same token when used lazily, eg without addressing the fundamental basics of room acoustics, musical satisfaction can be severely damaged.