PDA

View Full Version : Usher R1.5 power amp.



Enossification
02-08-2025, 07:56
Usher R1.5 power amplifier mini review
Two years

Test CD's Jamiroquai Dynamite, Damon Albarn Everyday Robots and India Arie Acoustic Soul.

Firstly, this amplifier sounds pretty ordinary when cold with a slightly brittle top end, thin-ish midrange and bland bass. There is little depth and presence.

After a sixty minute warm up in which the amplifier gets very warm to touch, there is an amazing transformation of the sound. The low end becomes very tight and controlled with this amazing presence and depth. I have not heard this before so forgive me but this is to me very special. It doesn't not have the classic transistor thwack and punch but does have amazing grip. The bass also has really good depth into floorstanders. If you only listen to EDM or electronica this is probably not for you.

On India Arie's track 'Brown Skin' I have heard much better bass from a Samson Servo 600 amp but of course this amp swallows that for breakfast in terms of bass quality and presence. This amplifier also displays bass where I have never really been aware of any in the past. Lightweight Genesis albums suddenly have huge low frequency content where appropriate.

The midrange is sublime but sounds very 'valve like'. To me the amp sounds like the best of EL34 vocals but with incredible bass. There is no artifice to the vocals that there so often is. There is no sound of being contrived and artificial, all very natural and highly realistic which when combined with a slightly rolled off treble makes for very easy listening.

The treble is such that many would say this is dull sounding. It definitely sounds rolled off but this adds to the natural sound with no added emphasis. The amp sounds wonderful on that 50's jazz thing. Saxophone sounds stunning.

OK, so to sum up; amazing sound, amazing stereo, amazing bass but restrained. Not for everyone. If you like precise, tight sound with a high degree of punch and grip look elsewhere. This amp suits my speakers very well (KEF R5's) giving an amazing sound. It uses around 72 Watts of electricity on standby that goes up to 720 Watts when powered on but the sound is wonderful although not for everyone. It's consumption of energy is justified.

The best sound is after an hour, wide stereo, huge bass depth and presence, incredible vocals but slightly dull sounding. The volume needs to be slightly higher than normal listening giving the best (lively) sound. Worth the dosh ? I bought secondhand so yes, very worth the dosh.

Macca
02-08-2025, 08:22
Supposedly a copy of the Nelson Pass 'Stasis' amplifier, as is the Nakamichi PA7

Bruiser of an amplifier.

72 watts in standby sounds a bit scary, are you sure it uses that much?

Pigmy Pony
02-08-2025, 08:38
Perhaps Shaun means 'idle', ie switched on but doing nowt. My MF A5 has a maximum consumption of 750 watts, and 70 watts at idle.

Macca
02-08-2025, 08:43
Perhaps Shaun means 'idle', ie switched on but doing nowt. My MF A5 has a maximum consumption of 750 watts, and 70 watts at idle.

That would make sense. Mind you my Sony pre eats 15w on standby - proper standby not active but doing nothing - 131 KW a year or about fifty quid.

Pigmy Pony
02-08-2025, 09:09
That would make sense. Mind you my Sony pre eats 15w on standby - proper standby not active but doing nothing - 131 KW a year or about fifty quid.

Now that I find scary - that kind of money could easily buy you a monthly sausage & egg McMuffin. My Marantz CD player is the only thing that stays on standby, and uses 0.3W.

I've just checked out consumption of my 2TB Sky Q box, and that is 26.4W in standby. Even though it goes into 'eco mode' between 2.30 and 5.45am, overall that's still going to be about £70, or 25 sausage & egg McMuffins a year. Not too happy about that.

Barry
02-08-2025, 10:19
My Levinson ML-2 monoblocks operate in pure Class A, so that's at least 50W when idling (actually I think it's more like 100W!) Probably useful during the winter months, but unbearable in summer.
They have now been 'retired' and replaced with Quad 510 monoblocks, which are more efficient, run cooler and to my ears sound just as good. :)

Enossification
02-08-2025, 11:45
Supposedly a copy of the Nelson Pass 'Stasis' amplifier, as is the Nakamichi PA7

Bruiser of an amplifier.

72 watts in standby sounds a bit scary, are you sure it uses that much?

I really don't know but that is what the spec says. So typical though, energy prices go through the roof just as I get the amp of my dreams.

Enossification
02-08-2025, 11:47
My Levinson ML-2 monoblocks operate in pure Class A, so that's at least 50W when idling (actually I think it's more like 100W!) Probably useful during the winter months, but unbearable in summer.
They have now been 'retired' and replaced with Quad 510 monoblocks, which are more efficient, run cooler and to my ears sound just as good. :)

Yes, summer running is scary and very warm but I have rigged up a large USB fan to run over the amp. The fan is almost silent and does a good job of circulating the air.

Enossification
02-08-2025, 11:48
That would make sense. Mind you my Sony pre eats 15w on standby - proper standby not active but doing nothing - 131 KW a year or about fifty quid.

Sounds much more accurate a description.

Macca
02-08-2025, 12:58
I really don't know but that is what the spec says. So typical though, energy prices go through the roof just as I get the amp of my dreams.

And I thought that sort of thing only happened to me.

Enossification
03-08-2025, 06:26
I do know that when I wish to listen to some music I have to switch the amp on at the mains and at this point it is guzzling the 72 Watts. When I then power it on by it's main switch it goes up to the maximum 720 Watts. I guess in reality it is irrelevant, I wanted the damn thing and I got it. Stop whinging.

Macca
03-08-2025, 07:52
I do know that when I wish to listen to some music I have to switch the amp on at the mains and at this point it is guzzling the 72 Watts. When I then power it on by it's main switch it goes up to the maximum 720 Watts. I guess in reality it is irrelevant, I wanted the damn thing and I got it. Stop whinging.

Yes - so it's 72 watts at idle and nothing when it's not in use at all. Unless you have it on all the time it's a fairly negligible expense in the grand scheme of things.

My amp eats power too but it's only on about 3 hours a day so not a big deal.

Pigmy Pony
03-08-2025, 08:14
I do know that when I wish to listen to some music I have to switch the amp on at the mains and at this point it is guzzling the 72 Watts. When I then power it on by it's main switch it goes up to the maximum 720 Watts. I guess in reality it is irrelevant, I wanted the damn thing and I got it. Stop whinging.

Yeah, just get on with enjoying it :)

To put things into perspective: UK electricity costs are around 25p per kWh, so your Usher will be costing you about 18p per hour in use. Compare that with someone who pays £1,000 for a cartridge, and gets 1,000 hrs before replacement :eek:

Another thought: come winter you might be able to turn your heating thermostat down a bit, so a saving to be made there.

Enossification
03-08-2025, 12:38
Yes you guys, our 'smart' meter displays a few pence usually and only nine pence with the hi-fi on. This is my finest ever hi-fi system since starting in 1979 so I need to stop whinging about it's power consumption and listen to the bloody music. Also, my system is rarely on for more than four hours every now and then so I share that one with Macca. Thanks for your comments.

Macca
03-08-2025, 13:10
Party on!