Log in

View Full Version : tracking error of SME 3012



Wakefield Turntables
25-11-2020, 19:38
Does anyone know the tracking error of a SME 3012 or SME V-12? I've heard that 12" tonearms like the 3012 have a tracking error of 0.67%, is this true?

DiveDeepDog
25-11-2020, 20:31
If you put the numbers in Vinyl Engine, Lofgren A submits 0.47% maximum distortion.

I'm assuming maximum distortion = tracking error ? I can always be wrong though :scratch:

Shovel_Knight
25-11-2020, 20:36
No, tracking error is the difference between the ideal tracking angle (when the stylus is tangential to the groove) and the actual tracking angle.

Wakefield Turntables
25-11-2020, 20:51
The only reason I ask is because I'm considering a 16" tonearm and just want to see how much of an improvment in tracking error improves from 12 to 16" :eek:

DiveDeepDog
25-11-2020, 21:11
No, tracking error is the difference between the ideal tracking angle (when the stylus is tangential to the groove) and the actual tracking angle.

Same figures show 1.36 degrees maximum error. With 16" arm that goes down to 1 degree. Distortion from 0.47>0.34%.

Same as everything, which set of compromise's do your ears prefer? Extra length may reduce distortions, but adds it's own issues with rigidity, effective mass and lots of other technical issues.

DiveDeepDog
25-11-2020, 21:11
Doh, wrong again, I'm off :-)

Barry
26-11-2020, 00:19
For a given arm geometry both the offset angle and overhang are inversely related to the effective arm length.

The distortion caused by deviation from tangential tracking is proportional to the tangent of the angular error, so is more or less inversely proportional to the effective arm length.

Thus the tracking distortion of a 12" arm will be 3/4 of that for a 9" arm: in the case of the SME arms 0.65% maximum distortion for the 3009, and 0.49% for the 3012.

It therefore follows that a 16" arm will have 3/4 of the distortion of that for a 12" arm, or 0.37%.

However longer arms will have their own disadvantages: increased effective mass and reduced torsional and flexural rigidity, so are not a panacea by any means.

disarmamant
28-11-2020, 20:20
Same as everything, which set of compromise's do your ears prefer? Extra length may reduce distortions, but adds it's own issues with rigidity, effective mass and lots of other technical issues.

A ten inch tone arm is a very good compromise in terms of rigidity and effective mass.

Try to hear a Phonomac modified Audio Technica AT 1010 (PMAT1010) superb sound quality, dynamic and highly detailed with both MC and MM cartridges. Completely outclassed my SME IV.

Wakefield Turntables
28-11-2020, 20:36
A ten inch tone arm is a very good compromise in terms of rigidity and effective mass.

Try to hear a Phonomac modified Audio Technica AT 1010 (PMAT1010) superb sound quality, dynamic and highly detailed with both MC and MM cartridges. Completely outclassed my SME IV.

I was in the market for one but he couldn't do a 12" version. Ah well.....

disarmamant
28-11-2020, 20:58
I was in the market for one but he couldn't do a 12" version. Ah well.....

Why do you need a 12” version?

Wakefield Turntables
28-11-2020, 21:32
Why do you need a 12” version?

Because I like extra length, fnarrrrr.... :eyebrows: