Stalked and harassed by Graham Peck/A.K.A Rudolph Hucker

[Marco]

Hi Guys,

I'd like your advice. I was wondering what you'd do in my position. of having been a victim of continual harassment, and stalked for about the last 5 years, by a persistent Internet troll, in terms of what action you'd take against him, given that I now have evidence of his behaviour, in the form of the screenshots shown below, taken from the website he runs.

The name of this troll is Graham Peck, A,K.A Rudolph Hucker, Mike Oxbig, Chris P Bacon, and many other 'inventive' titles. Those of you who've been posting on forums for as long as I have, will be aware of this idiot, and who's been banned from every hi-fi forum under the sun for his appalling behaviour.

As you will see, Graham Peck and others on his forum are guilty of consistently making illegal racist remarks, such as "Darkies", "Spear Chuckers", "Niggas", "Sand Wogs", etc, as well as referring to me as a "slum landlord" (which is actionable as defamation, as I rent out a couple of properties locally), and "Welsh Wog"/"Half a Pasta Wog".

Together with Graham Peck making defamatory references to my "manly wife" [the complete opposite of what she is] and my deceased mother, as a "Pasta Wog" - all of which violates the Terms of Use of the website's hosts [Forumotion.com], under the section of 'PROHIBITED CONTENT AND BEHAVIOUR', see here, third down, re: 'Hateful and abusive/repulsive/defamatory content': https://www.forumotion.com/terms-of-service

This is the section of Graham Peck's forum, dedicated to subjecting my family and I to continuous defamatory and racist remarks:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/923/mFDMRH.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/921/rXpIjq.png

And the subsequent saved screenshots, as follows:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/921/t9faxg.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/923/QGFe9D.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/922/sXTCx8.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/923/J9SaIH.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/923/Gd5pDB.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/922/t0110N.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/922/DArSfl.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/923/XkjHB2.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/922/nwtykP.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/923/PwCuom.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/923/06g7oU.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/923/ROL9cO.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/922/9vDAh1.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/921/MjN171.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/924/fg0Cxe.png

I have many more similar screenshots saved. The last one is proof positive of Graham Peck's intent to troll me in disguise. Well, I don't need to know his IP address, as I have the address of where he lives.

So please vote on the poll, and/or post here outlining what action, or otherwise, you would take in my position against Graham Peck. In my view, there is enough evidence, if necessary, for proceeding with a criminal case against Graham Peck.

Marco.

[struth]

Only use this forum so don't see his bile, but bile it is.
Knuckle draggers need sorted. Sure he has broken numerous laws in those statements too so use that to deal with Graham Peck.

[walpurgis]

Dreadful stuff. A matter for Swedish authorities at the least and certainly actionable.

[Alex_UK]

Disgusting behaviour by this Graham Peck, but I would be wary of taking matters into your own hands. For me I would go with "option 1", but as Geoff and Grant say, the relevant Swedish authorities as well.

[willbewill]

A difficult one, I don't think Sweden's 'hate crime' laws are quite up to our expected standards so not a lot of redress in that route methinks. So I've chosen option one in the first instance.

[struth]

Member states are also bound to combat public incitement to violence and hatred against people of different race, colour, religion, or national or ethnic descent by means of criminal law. So no get out clause really as they are members...

[Rosewind]

Collect evidence of the systematic stalkiing, which is what you have been doing. Contact a Swedish help group to see what advice they can give you: info makeequal se
Their website is in Swedish but they should be able to give you advice and, perhaps, even assist you. The man in question, Graham Peck, is likely to have a track record in other places.

[Joe]

Disgusting behaviour, but I would be wary of taking matters into your own hands.

If I was going to do that I certainly wouldn't signal my intention of doing so in advance. Living well is the best revenge.

[crimsondonkey]

Fuck sakes just ignore it. Five people on the internet don’t like you? Big deal, so what?

First step, stop visiting the site and reading that crap.
Second step, see step one.

[scotty38]

Fuck sakes just ignore it. Five people on the internet don’t like you? Big deal, so what?

First step, stop visiting the site and reading that crap.
Second step, see step one.

Can't help thinking you'd have a different view if you were on the receiving end....

[Puffin]

Here in the UK we have the Protection from Harassment Act (1997) which says that if harassment has taken place on more than one occasion then you can apply for an injunction to prevent further harassment from this Graham Peck. You can take out a civil action or the Police can bring a criminal case. There may be similar legislation in Sweden. I would do as Rosewind suggests and see what action could be taken. Might be worth contacting a Swedish lawyer for a telephone conference, so long as they speak English even if it costs you.

[Lawrence001]

Can't help thinking you'd have a different view if you were on the receiving end....I was about to give the same advice but worded differently. The fact is that humans have an inherent desire to repeat behaviours which can be helpful or destructive in different contexts. This is probably related to the way children learn from parents throughout nature and is important in early development, but the impulse to do so is carried over later in life (and eventually becomes OCD in the worse cases).

In this case, what I'm saying is that we all have a natural desire to repeat behaviours, but as adults we are able to switch it off if we try (although when it's OCD it's a lot harder to retrain the brain to do so). If you have an impulse (quite naturally, the vast majority of people, including me, would) to regularly check the despicable posts for updates. The best course of action is to try hard, consciously at first, to ignore this impulse, and over time hopefully the desire will reduce to the point that you hardly ever think about it.

I'm not implying there's any mental health issues here (on your side, clearly there is on Graham Peck's) just how the brain works, and how knowledge of this can help us to make better decisions.

The only damage it's doing to you (assuming clients and acquaintances do not read it and take any notice) is through your awareness of the content of the posts. If you are not aware of them, and not bothered by that, then they can do you no harm.

I'm assuming here that this Graham Peck is not dangerous and may at some point resort to making threats online he may later go on to enact, or encourage others to do so. In which case keeping up to date on his postings is something that should be done, but if you have a trusted friend who can do so, and you both agree never to discuss the content except in the case that it becomes dangerous, then you can avoid the harm that knowledge of the posts would bring.

It's quite possible that thinking about this over an extended period has also formed pathways in the brain akin to (but not necessarily actual) PTSD. If it becomes hard to move on, and over time it should naturally happen, then other forms of treatment can help, mindfulness and meditation type techniques (which can just be as simple as 5 mins of slow deep breathing in silence or with a tacky meditation album on in the background) or, worst case, cognitive behavioural therapy. If you think this is a load of bollocks (as I did less than 5 years ago) them look again, as it's not! I've really turned my anger and, later, anxiety issues (which I wasn't really aware of, or at least refused to recognise) around just through talking to someone 3 or 4 times about it and changing my attitude and outlook. And I'm much happier as a result!

I've gone a bit off topic beyond the situation in question to wider mental well-being but I'll leave it all up as it's still relevant. Just my twopenn'orth of course.

Sent from my POT-LX1 using Tapatalk

[Marco]

Ok guys, thanks for your input, which is appreciated. Now for some replies!:)


Member states are also bound to combat public incitement to violence and hatred against people of different race, colour, religion, or national or ethnic descent by means of criminal law. So no get out clause really as they are members...

That's is the point. It's not just because Graham Peck, and his fellow "dregs of society" [which rather aptly on the site concerned forms the owner's description of the membership], who has targeted my wife and I with harassment and abuse, for years, but Graham Peck, and also other members there have very clear bigoted and racist tendencies, which I'd take a very dim view of regardless of anything else!

And fortunately the authorities would agree, moreover I'm sure will the hosts of Graham Peck's website, when I send them the screenshots taken.

Marco.

[Marco]

Hi Peter,


Collect evidence of the systematic stalkiing, which is what you have been doing. Contact a Swedish help group to see what advice they can give you: info makeequal se
Their website is in Swedish but they should be able to give you advice and, perhaps, even assist you. The man in question is likely to have a track record in other places.

Thanks for the link. I'll certainly check out that site [fortunately Chrome can be set to translate full pages on the net in foreign languages into English]. It will be useful from the point of view of getting a handle on my options for proceeding with any legal action, against Graham Peck, from a Swedish standpoint:)

Marco.

[crimsondonkey]

Can't help thinking you'd have a different view if you were on the receiving end....

I can’t help thinking your assumptions are incorrect!

We all deal with things differently. If they’ve broken the law, report them. If you don’t like what they’re saying just ignore them, trolls feed on this kind of attention so why give them what they want. It’s hard reading horrible and hurtful comments about you but these people’s opinions, this Graham Peck, count for nothing so I just don’t place any importance to what they say.

[Pigmy Pony]

I did at first think flying over and confronting Graham Peck in a non-violent manner would be a good option, but having seen that picture of Graham Peck (I assume that's him), and having some idea how well my impulse control works (it doesn't) I just know violence would be inevitable. So I voted for option 1.

[Marco]

If I was going to do that I certainly wouldn't signal my intention of doing so in advance. Living well is the best revenge.

Firstly, I should point out that Option 3 on the poll would be strictly with non-threatening or violent intent. It would be a case of seeing whether Graham Peck would have the balls to tell me to my face what he writes on his forum, which I seriously doubt, as most of these scumbags, like Graham Peck, are cowards. Easy enough to do, as I have Graham Peck's address.

In terms of the bit in bold, you are *so* right!! That is **precisely why** that after reading on Graham Peck's site how much me living well and being happy with life irks him (and the other resident wastes of space), nothing gave me greater pleasure than going on about it MORE (as I know they'll reading), just to rub their noses in it!!!:lol::lol:

But they, and especially Graham Peck, were too thick to see it.... So as you say, showcasing my lifestyle (perfectly normal to most continentals, who like me, love their food and wine, but to Graham Peck and his cronies was ignorantly considered as 'overindulgent'], on a regular basis, was the best form of revenge, as they fell for it every time!

Glove puppets are less easily manipulated:D:eyebrows:

Marco.

[Wakefield Turntables]

Firstly I have sympathy. Collecting pictures of where this Graham Peck lives and his car could been seen as evidence of some future vendetta, even revenge stalking. What happens if his property and car suddenly become "damaged". It only takes him to provide screenshots of your posts for a likely motive.

[nonuffin]

I am surprised that this Graham Peck individual has managed to get under your skin Marco. The way to avoid that is not to read such total tosh.

From what I have read on the screenshots Graham Peck is mostly talking to himself and has very little effect in the great wide world beyond his delusions. Except of course that you yourself have given it a wider audience by posting it here, which no doubt pleases Graham Peck, the moron, even more.

The sensible mature move is to not read it and it will implode on itself given time when there is no audience for it.

In my view unless you are happy to spend an inordinate amount of time and or money on this issue, it will be every bit as damaging to your well being as reading this utter shite. Tread carefully.

[Marco]

I can’t help thinking your assumptions are incorrect!

We all deal with things differently. If they’ve broken the law, report them. If you don’t like what they’re saying just ignore them, trolls feed on this kind of attention so why give them what they want. It’s hard reading horrible and hurtful comments about you but these people’s opinions count for nothing so I just don’t place any importance to what they say.

It would've been helpful, Wayne if you'd shown that level of sensitivity and consideration in your opening post, rather than your rather brusque/rude and dismissive tone in what, in a wider context, is a serious issue. This sort of shit goes way deeper than a few people not liking me on the Internet.

Anyway, I'll get to that in a minute.

Marco.

[Macca]

Option one plus report to the police as the racism is a criminal offence.

[Marco]

Firstly I have sympathy. Collecting pictures of where he lives and his car could been seen as evidence of some future vendetta, even revenge stalking. What happens if his property and car suddenly become "damaged". It only takes him to provide screenshots of your posts for a likely motive.

Well, I'd have numerous alibis here and evidence to prove that at the time of said crime I was nowhere near Sweden!;)

However, as the picture of his house has now served its purpose (simply proof that I know where he lives, nothing more), and most importantly as I don't want it clogging up the thread every time I post, I shall remove it.

Marco.

[Marco]

Option one plus report to the police as the racism is a criminal offence.

Indeed it is mate, and a very serious one these days. Something that Wayne hasn't seemed to grasp, and which will form a significant basis of any legal action I take against Peck - that's why I took so many screenshots of the racist remarks on his site!

Marco.

[Marco]

Here in the UK we have the Protection from Harassment Act (1997) which says that if harassment has taken place on more than one occasion then you can apply for an injunction to prevent further harassment. You can take out a civil action or the Police can bring a criminal case. There may be similar legislation in Sweden. I would do as Rosewind suggests and see what action could be taken. Might be worth contacting a Swedish lawyer for a telephone conference, so long as they speak English even if it costs you.

Thanks, Rob. I'll certainly look into that, as it's a blatant case of harassment, and also stalking over a number of years.

This hasn't just happened recently or infrequently, or otherwise I wouldn't be mentioning it. It's a prolonged and sustained (near-daily) hate campaign, conducted by Peck, which has been going on for years, and which would be obvious if I could link you to the site and read the whole of the thread concerned, together with previous ones of that nature, which I have saved.

Unfortunately that's not possible, as Peck has crapped himself as usual and closed off viewing of his 'forum' to non-members. That's fine, as there won't be any forum left for him to worry about soon;)

Marco.

[crimsondonkey]

Apologies, one mans blunt and direct is another’s brusque and rude, however no offence was intended on my part.

I’m just surprised you are entertaining this in this way. I’m suggesting that the hateful and racist comments should be reported to appropriate authorities and then the whole den of scum just ignored, they don’t deserve attention which is clearly what they crave - don’t give them further satisfaction.

One of the difficult things about ‘free speech’ on the internet is that it provides a platform for the hateful and the prejudiced to get under the skin of other people. And whilst you can’t control what people think about you, you can to some extent get some censure on what they write about you in public.

Also I would seek some advice before publishing the offenders private details on your forum just to check that you are not leaving yourself open to action or liability. You know your business better than I do in that regard.

[rmcin626]

I think that the advice from Rob is good sound advice, although my younger self would go done an entirely route. One of pet hates is any form of bullying or bigotry, and this guy is ticking plenty of boxes.

[crimsondonkey]

Something that Wayne hasn't seemed to grasp
.

Oh yes I do, thank you.

I think we agree on the seriousness of this but slightly differ on the approach to take. Legal action/ redress - Agree as I’ve suggested the same.

Then I’d just ignore them and give them any further attention in the meantime. I certainly wouldn’t waste my time reading what they are saying about me, their hateful opinions are worthless. YMMV and I understand the temptation.

[Marco]

Fuck sakes just ignore it. Five people on the internet don’t like you? Big deal, so what?

First step, stop visiting the site and reading that crap.
Second step, see step one.

That's not the point. The point is that it's important to take a stance against bigots and bullies [which Peck certainly is], and those who think that they can harass and abuse people with impunity from behind the 'safety' of their computers. On social media, which this effectively is, people have been known to commit suicide for less.

One of the things I abhor most in today's world is folk who think they can say and do what they want online, without repercussions, and who refuse to take any responsibility for their actions. It's a disease endemic in today's society and spawned by the creation of the Internet, as it has given a 'voice' to the dregs and lowlifes of this world who beforehand were rightly silenced.

Well, I'm here to silence them again and ensure that they pay for their actions!

Marco.

[Marco]

Ok, need to pop out for a bit, but will be back shortly!:cool:

Marco.

[Marco]

Oh yes I do, thank you.

I think we agree on the seriousness of this but slightly differ on the approach to take. Legal action/ redress - Agree as I’ve suggested the same.

Then I’d just ignore them and give them any further attention in the meantime. I certainly wouldn’t waste my time reading what they are saying about me, their hateful opinions are worthless. YMMV and I understand the temptation.

Yes, but you could've put your point across before rather more sensitively. Please remember that in future, as on AoS we're used to being nice to each other!:)

Marco.

[Alex_UK]

I was about to add that it isn't just about Marco (he's big enough and ugly enough to look after himself! :D) but what about someone less able? If he's behaving like this with Marco and clearly a racist bully, who else is he doing it to? And will they be mentally strong enough to brush it off, least of all stand up to them, and I totally hate bullying and anyone who does it deserves to reap the consequences.

[struth]

I was about to add that it isn't just about Marco (he's big enough and ugly enough to look after himself! :D) but what about someone less able? If he's behaving like this with Marco and clearly a racist bully, who else is he doing it to? And will they be mentally strong enough to brush it off, least of all stand up to them, and I totally hate bullying and anyone who does it deserves to reap the consequences.

Lol, I used to beat up the bullys at school... does that make me a bully too?:ner:

[Pigmy Pony]

Yes, but you could've put your point across before rather more sensitively. Please remember that in future, as on AoS we're used to being nice to each other!:)

Marco.

I suspect that Wayne's "bluntness" comes from a position of anger at these trolls, and not dismissiveness of your handling of the problem. When feelings run high, context of some posts can be lost.

Remember we're all on your side buddy! :)

[Alex_UK]

Lol, I used to beat up the bullys at school... does that make me a bully too?:ner:

Nope, that makes you The Equalizer! :D

[Pigmy Pony]

Lol, I used to beat up the bullys at school... does that make me a bully too?:ner:

No, it makes you the Equaliser. You were an inspiration for Edwood Woodwood :)

[Pigmy Pony]

Nope, that makes you The Equalizer! :D

Dammit Alex, are you walking round in my head again? You'll find nothing of any value there you know. And nicking my thoughts ten minutes before I thought them is a bit fiendish ;)

[crimsondonkey]

I suspect that Wayne's "bluntness" comes from a position of anger at these trolls, and not dismissiveness of your handling of the problem. When feelings run high, context of some posts can be lost.

Remember we're all on your side buddy! :)

Thanks. Yes the enemy is the one posting this hateful bile, I’m completely with Marco, albeit with perhaps a different take on the best course of action - I’ve consistently shared my abhorrence and tried to make suggestions intended to be helpful.

[Gazjam]

Marco,

Obviously what he’s saying is vile, and very wrong seems a bit mentally unhinged to me.
Its words In the public domain and yeah...it’s racist.
I’d seek advice on what can be done in Sweden, and contact the forums he posts on reporting his behaviour, it’s violating Terms of Service.

From a different view,
This doesn't have to bother you...

Your allowing this idiot to live in your Head Marco, with respect mate, that’s a choice your making.
Just because idiots/ bully’s/ online trolls say something, doesn’t make it true.
Who cares if his followers lap it up?

As someone said earlier, the best revenge is living well.

Main thing I guess, report it thru official channels - then let it be.
Don’tlet this guy live in your head, it’ll affect you.

[ianlenco]

http://www.report-it.org.uk/your_police_force

Maybe our police have connections with Sweden so start here?

[Marco]

Hi Dominic,


I am surprised that this individual has managed to get under your skin Marco. The way to avoid that is not to read such total tosh.

From what I have read on the screenshots the idiot is mostly talking to himself and has very little effect in the great wide world beyond his delusions. Except of course that you yourself have given it a wider audience by posting it here, which no doubt pleases the moron even more.

The sensible mature move is to not read it and it will implode on itself given time when there is no audience for it.

In my view unless you are happy to spend an inordinate amount of time and or money on this issue, it will be every bit as damaging to your well being as reading this utter shite. Tread carefully.

In terms of the bit in bold, sure, but do remember that Peck's hate campaign against me has been carrying on almost daily for years, and until recently, on top of the very similar treatment I was being subjected to from the now-deceased Richard Dunn (of NVA), and the associated keyboard warriors on his forum, HFS - and for over an even longer period...! Therefore, there's a limit to how thick your skin is!;)

Just ignoring it or not reading it is great advice, but in reality not so easy when you're the victim, and bear in mind that ignoring it publicly is precisely what I've done up until now. But enough is enough. Up until now, I'd simply considered Peck and his cronies as pitiable 'no-marks' with very obvious mental conditions, and not worth the bother, so I'd have gone for option 4 on the poll.

Now, however, Option 1 is most likely.

Marco.

[Marco]

Thanks. Yes the enemy is the one posting this hateful bile, I’m completely with Marco, albeit with perhaps a different take on the best course of action - I’ve consistently shared my abhorrence and tried to make suggestions intended to be helpful.

Cheers, Wayne. I appreciate that!:thumbsup:

Marco.

[Bigman80]

Hi Domenic,



In terms of the bit in bold, sure, but do remember that Peck's hate campaign against me has been carrying on almost daily for years, and until recently, on top of the very similar treatment I was being subjected to from the now-deceased Richard Dunn (of NVA), and the associated keyboard warriors on his forum, HFS - and on there for even longer...! Therefore, there's a limit to how thick your skin is!;)

Just ignoring it or not reading it is great advice, but in reality not so easy to do when you're the victim, and bear in mind that ignoring it publicly is precisely what I'd done up until now. But enough was enough. Up until now, I'd simply considered Peck and his cronies as pitiable 'no-marks' with very obvious mental conditions, and not worth the bother, so I'd have gone for option 4 on the poll.

Now, however, Option 1 is most likely.

Marco.What part in the origin of this hate campain were you a part of, to get this reaction from the man, Marco?

Anything? or did it start for absolutely no reason? Has he singled you out or is there a back story?

Reason I ask is,

It must surely be easier and quicker to approach him directly, either with a temporary membership here at AoS, or on Snake oil and just put it to rest between the two of you via Pm.

With the greatest respect, from what I have read around the forum-verse, neither Richard Dunn, Mr Peck or yourself have been immaculately behaved towards each other.

With Richard Dunn firmly planted in the dirt, there could be an opportunity to put the past firmly behind all of you. A fresh start?

Now before anyone jumps on that with "oh he's a racist" etc, I am not defending the posts or behaviours of anyone, but the Simplest solution is to put it to bed between the two parties.

[Marco]

I was about to add that it isn't just about Marco (he's big enough and ugly enough to look after himself! :D) but what about someone less able? If he's behaving like this with Marco and clearly a racist bully, who else is he doing it to? And will they be mentally strong enough to brush it off, least of all stand up to them, and I totally hate bullying and anyone who does it deserves to reap the consequences.

Indeed, Alex. That is a very pertinent point. I've always been the type to stand up for myself and not just 'sit back and take' being insulted, harassed or vilified. Why should I, or indeed anyone else, put up with that shit? And one thing bullies hate is a taste of their own medicine and people who aren't afraid to fight back!

It would be all too easy for any of us to start a free forum and use it a vehicle to harass and abuse people we don't like. I could go to town on folk like Peck, as in terms of being ripe for ridiculing, they're an open goal!!

However, most of us are well-adjusted enough not to do that, plus also HAVE A REAL LIFE to lead! And that's a big part of the problem, as most of these trolls don't. They're bored/unfulfilled inadequates, and so need some 'excitement'/stimulation to fill the void in what is obviously their very unhappy lives. Sad bastards.

Marco.

[oldius]

It seems to me that you wish to take action. In that case, contact the host of his forum and alert them to its racist content.

There is a time when doing nothing, which I would be tempted to do, is at an end. I do think that he has overstepped the mark by attacking your family but causing potential damage to yourself by taking vigilante action is not an option.

[Marco]

What part in the origin of this hate campain were you a part of, to get this reaction from the man, Marco?

Anything? or did it start for absolutely no reason? Has he singled you out or is there a back story?


Yes there is, would you like to know?


Reason I ask is,

It must surely be easier and quicker to approach him directly, either with a temporary membership here at AoS, or on Snake oil and just put it to rest between the two of you via Pm.


Lol - you're joking surely? No way am I going to waste my time engaging directly with the nutter, or worse allow him on here, as that would achieve nothing worthwhile whatsoever. So with respect, I shall be continuing as planned.


With the greatest respect, from what I have read around the forum-verse, neither Richard Dunn, Mr Peck or yourself have been immaculately behaved towards each other.


Sure, we all have our skeletons in the cupboard, especially when you've been posting on forums for as long as I have, but I hope you don't think that that justifies the harassment and hate campaign I've been subjected to by Peck for the last 5 years, and some of the vile (and racist) remarks made towards not only me, but my wife and dead mother? "Pasta wog" indeed!


With Richard Dunn firmly planted in the dirt, there could be an opportunity to put the past firmly behind all of you. A fresh start?


That's a separate subject (the HFS thing) and not something I'm going to discuss here. There is lots of 'putting the past firmly behind' needed to be done by various parties, not just me, before that can happen. Anyway, for the moment I'm concentrating solely on Peck.

Btw, you do realise he's using AA, (or has used it in the past) to conduct his hate campaign against me? If not, see the 8th screenshot I've posted, where he boasts about his "wealth posts"... He's certainly not someone I'd be welcoming with open arms on my forum, and treated as 'normal', as indeed seems to be the case on AA.

Indeed if any member of AoS had behaved as Peck has done [elsewhere or otherwise], especially in respect of racist behaviour, they'd be banned instantly. They certainly wouldn't be welcome here. However, that's entirely up to Westie and you. You should, however, be aware that I have taken screenshots of Hucker's posts in question on AA, and as such could be part of any legal action I pursue against him.

Marco.

[Marco]

It seems to me that you wish to take action. In that case, contact the host of his forum and alert them to its racist content.

There is a time when doing nothing, which I would be tempted to do, is at an end. I do think that he has overstepped the mark by attacking your family but causing potential damage to yourself by taking vigilante action is not an option.

Thanks for that, and rest assured that that is not an option I'm remotely considering.

Marco.

[smangus]

Report to the police , they will have an avenue to contact the Swedish Authorities. Anything uotside this route may have unintended consequences.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

[Marco]

Marco,

Obviously what he’s saying is vile, and very wrong seems a bit mentally unhinged to me.
Its words In the public domain and yeah...it’s racist.
I’d seek advice on what can be done in Sweden, and contact the forums he posts on reporting his behaviour, it’s violating Terms of Service.

From a different view,
This doesn't have to bother you...

Your allowing this idiot to live in your Head Marco, with respect mate, that’s a choice your making.
Just because idiots/ bully’s/ online trolls say something, doesn’t make it true.
Who cares if his followers lap it up?

As someone said earlier, the best revenge is living well.

Main thing I guess, report it thru official channels - then let it be.
Don’tlet this guy live in your head, it’ll affect you.

Cheers, bud - all noted, especially the bit in bold, which I'll be continuing to do!:cool:

After all it does say on my profile I'm a bon vivant!;)

Marco.

[Gaz]

I was wondering the same as Bigman80 and am playing devil's advocate here so please don't take it the wrong way.

Without meaning to sound rude, and certainly without condoning what is happening to you, I can't help but to wonder why two individuals have been motivated to act in such a manner? I too have been posting on various forums for many years but to date have never had anything like this happen.

Taking this matter to a worst case scenario, eg a trial in court, anything you may have done to provoke or exacerbate it will be exploited to the full by his defence lawyer.

If, and it sounds highly likely, this character has mental health issues, this along with any antagonism on your part may well be sufficient to see him get away with it and as a result make matters worse as he could see it as vindication that reinforces his position?

It's easy for me to say as I'm not on the receiving end but maybe totally ignoring him, at least in the short term, might be the best course of action?

[Marco]

Report to the police , they will have an avenue to contact the Swedish Authorities. Anything uotside this route may have unintended consequences.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Good advice, Andy, and rest assured it'll duly be taken heed of:)

Marco.

[Marco]

Hi Gaz,


I was wondering the same as Bigman80 and am playing devil's advocate here so please don't take it the wrong way.

Without meaning to sound rude, and certainly without condoning what is happening to you, I can't help but to wonder why two individuals have been motivated to act in such a manner? I too have been posting on various forums for many years but to date have never had anything like this happen.


Lol - with respect, I suspect we're two *very* different characters!!:eek::D You may be able to walk away from or put up with things that I can't, which is perhaps why I've been involved in more confrontations, liable to have created enemies.

Btw, I've been posting on forums since late 1998.

Plus.... In respect of RD, and what happened on HFS, if that's what you're referring to, there's WAY too much to go into there, to even remotely explain the reasons for that.


Taking this matter to a worst case scenario, eg a trial in court, anything you may have done to provoke or exacerbate it will be exploited to the full by his defence lawyer.

If, and it sounds highly likely, this character has mental health issues, this along with any antagonism on your part may well be sufficient to see him get away with it and as a result make matters worse as he could see it as vindication that reinforces his position?

It's easy for me to say as I'm not on the receiving end but maybe totally ignoring him, at least in the short term, might be the best course of action?

All true, good advice and noted:)

Marco.

[smangus]

Good advice, Andy, and rest assured it'll duly be taken heed of:)

Marco.Suggest you do it well before brexit though as there are a lot of question marks over security, law and the continuing exchange of information between law enforcement bodies post this. etc.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

[Marco]

I suspect that Wayne's "bluntness" comes from a position of anger at these trolls, and not dismissiveness of your handling of the problem. When feelings run high, context of some posts can be lost.

Remember we're all on your side buddy! :)

Cheers, Steve. That's really appreciated:cool:

Marco.

[Marco]

Suggest you do it well before brexit though as there are a lot of question marks over security, law and the continuing exchange of information between law enforcement bodies post this. etc.


Defo... Don't worry, I'll be sorting this out long before that!

Marco.

[Barry]

Option 1 in the first instance, and as has been advised by others here, report it to the police.

Advice regarding ignoring the vile posts directed towards you and your family has, as you know, been discussed elsewhere, so all I will say is don't do anything that will be seen as libellous, or threatening, or undertake any action that would weaken your case.

From the replies posted here, it can be seen that we all sympathise with you Marco and wish for the best outcome.

[Bigman80]

Yes there is, would you like to know?

Not at all. I was just aware that there is possibly two sides to the origin of this shared hatred (Gleaned from you response) and sought clarification.

Lol - you're joking surely? No way am I going to waste my time engaging directly with the nutter, or worse allow him on here, as that would achieve nothing worthwhile whatsoever. So with respect, I shall be continuing as planned.

No, i was serious. Nations have been at war with hundreds of lives lost, for it to be ended by a civil conversation and working out their issues diplomatically. Doesn't seem to be too far fetched that two grown ass men could do the same over trading insults at each other!

Sure, we all have our skeletons in the cupboard, especially when you've been posting on forums for as long as I have, but I hope you don't think that that justifies the harassment and hate campaign I've been subjected to by Peck for the last 5 years, and some of the vile (and racist) remarks made towards not only me, but my wife and dead mother? "Pasta wog" indeed!

There is absolutely no justifying ANY form of hate and no, i dont think their is justification of for this behaviour.

That's a separate subject (the HFS thing) and not something I'm going to discuss here. There is lots of 'putting the past firmly behind' needed to be done by various parties, not just me, before that can happen. Anyway, for the moment I'm concentrating solely on Peck.

That's entirely your decision, Marco but i can't see why it can't be AoS, one of the largest hifi forums in the UK, setting the right precedent.

Btw, you do realise he's using AA, (or has used it in the past) to conduct his hate campaign against me? If not, see the 8th screenshot I've posted, where he boasts about his "wealth posts"... He's certainly not someone I'd be welcoming with open arms on my forum, and treated as 'normal', as indeed seems to be the case on AA.

Indeed if any member of AoS had behaved as Peck has done, they'd be banned instantly, especially with his racist tendencies, so they certainly wouldn't be welcome here, but that's entirely up to Westie and you. You should, however, be aware that I have taken screenshots of Hucker's posts in question on AA, and as such could be part of any legal action I pursue against him.

Audio Addicts is a forum that welcomes those who post within the rules of the forum. We have no agenda against any other forum or forum personality.
Personally, I haven't been on Snakeoil, so i had no idea what was posted there. In fact, when i just tried the screen is whited out and i cant see anything anyway.

As far as i am aware, Mr Pleck has not been guilty of breaching AA's rules. We are happy to co-operate with any legal investigation you may initiate.


Oliver

[Bigman80]

I was wondering the same as Bigman80 and am playing devil's advocate here so please don't take it the wrong way.

Without meaning to sound rude, and certainly without condoning what is happening to you, I can't help but to wonder why two individuals have been motivated to act in such a manner? I too have been posting on various forums for many years but to date have never had anything like this happen.

Taking this matter to a worst case scenario, eg a trial in court, anything you may have done to provoke or exacerbate it will be exploited to the full by his defence lawyer.

If, and it sounds highly likely, this character has mental health issues, this along with any antagonism on your part may well be sufficient to see him get away with it and as a result make matters worse as he could see it as vindication that reinforces his position?

It's easy for me to say as I'm not on the receiving end but maybe totally ignoring him, at least in the short term, might be the best course of action?

This is what i was getting at just not as successfully i feel lol.

[struth]

Tbh its just that he is a nasty piece of work. Ive read the stuff posted here, and did marcos mother and wife do him wrong. Did all the coloured folk he insults do him wrong... na, its pretty obvious to me anyway. Never an excuse to attack family or use the race card for any disagreement.

[Bigman80]

Tbh its just that he is a nasty piece of work. Ive read the stuff posted here, and did marcos mother and wife do him wrong. Did all the coloured folk he insults do him wrong... na, its pretty obvious to me anyway. Never an excuse to attack family or use the race card for any disagreement.

Organise a charity boxing match and beat the snot out of each other and make something good out of it. We can call it the Snakoil vs AoS "Beat-Off" although that may attract the wrong sorts :lol:.

All i was getting at was there is no innocent party involved so maybe handle it like gentlemen and resolve it privately or ignore it. Police won't do shit and as soon as Marco goes to them he will be facing the skeletons in his closet, The interest from plod will soon expire if all that shit comes back up.

Agree about the race comments though. Unacceptable.

[Marco]

Ollie please do not demean or belittle the seriousness of what Peck has done, what I've had to endure from that scumbag for years, or how it has affected me, with references to boxing matches, etc, or we *will* fall out! This is not a laughing matter.

Also, I have removed what you've written about historical events, which if you were aware of (as you obviously are), then why ask what the history was before?? I can only presume you have some sort of an agenda. You don't know the full story and I'm not getting into it here.

Be warned though, that any attempting to rationalise Peck's appalling behaviour (as that's how it comes across) will result in you being out for a month. No way am I putting up with that shit. Any further references to past history [in this instance something that occurred over 10 years ago], which you're not qualified to comment on, will be removed without further notice and also attract the same outcome.

Marco.

[Gaz]

If I were you Marco I'd close this thread.

A. The looney is probably loving the attention by proxy

B. Posts like the one above, however justified, add fuel to his fire about you being unreasonable

Just my advice

[Bigman80]

Ollie please do not demean or belittle the seriousness of what Peck has done, what I've had to endure from him for years, or how it has affected me, with references to boxing matches, etc, or we *will* fall out! This is not a laughing matter.

Also, I have removed what you've written about historical events, which if you were aware of (as you obviously are), then why ask me what the history was?? I can only presume you have some sort of an agenda. You don't know the full story and I'm not getting into it here.

Be warned though, that any further sympathising towards Peck will result in you being out for a month. No way am I putting up with that shit. Any further references to past history, which you're not qualified to comment on, will be removed without further notice and attract the same outcome.

Marco.Marco,

I'm not belittling anyone or anything, and am showing no sympathy toward anyone involved.

I don't know why you feel there is a need to "threaten" me with a "month out" either?

My intention had been to perhaps, enlighten you with the possible outcomes that you may be faced with if you chose to go ahead with your preferred option.

I have no affinity to anyone in this regard.

I'm not protecting anyone or inciting further reactions, just trying to offer a balanced perspective on the state of play from my informed perspective. Something many members here will not have.

I tell you what, I'll drop you a PM seeing as what I "know" seems to be unfit for forum consumption.

[Marco]

Marco,

I'm not belittling anyone or anything, and am showing no sympathy toward anyone involved.


That may not have been your intention, but that's not how it comes across. The fact is, *regardless* of what happened between Peck and me over 10, yes TEN years ago now, it does not entitle him to harass and vilify me ever since! No-one normal behaves like that.


I don't know why you feel there is a need to "threaten" me with a "month out" either?


Because I can't see any friendly or constructive reason why you would ask me what the history was, when you clearly *already* knew, and in such a way as to counter Grant's perfectly valid point beforehand about racist remarks aimed at my mother.

Do you see now how that could be construed as an attack? There is NO justifiable excuse for Peck's vile behaviour - end of, and anyone here who attempts to put one forward, will be seen as the enemy. Simples!

PM me what you like, but it won't make an iota of difference to what's happened here, so bear in mind what I've just said in future.

Marco.

[Bigman80]

Marco,

I've sent you my number.

Tapatalk is playing up and I can't be sitting in the house on the laptop in this weather!

[Marco]

If I were you Marco I'd close this thread.

A. The looney is probably loving the attention by proxy

B. Posts like the one above, however justified, add fuel to his fire about you being unreasonable

Just my advice

With respect, Gary, when you've been subjected to what I have from this scum, you're naturally going to be touchy about it. It's not about being unreasonable; it's about others who've never been a victim of this type of harassment having the common sense and sensitivity to understand that *any* attempt to sympathise with the offender or rationalise/justify his vile behaviour is naturally going to be frowned upon.

I trust you can appreciate that. The thread will therefore stay open as long as I consider it necessary, and I don't give a toss what said loony thinks.

Marco.

[Bigman80]

That may not have been your intention, but that's not how it comes across. The fact is, *regardless* of what happened between Peck and me over 10 years ago now, it does not entitle him to harass and vilify me ever since!



Because I can't see any friendly or constructive reason why you would ask me what the history was, when you *already* knew, and in such a way as to counter Grant's perfectly valid point beforehand about racist remarks aimed at my mother.

Do you see how that could be construed as an attack? There is NO justifiable excuse for Peck's behaviour - end of, and anyone here who attempts to put one forward will be seen as the enemy. Simples!

PM me what you like, but it won't make an iota of difference to what's happened here, so bear in mind what I've just said in future.

Marco.Tapatalk updated. Back in business.

Pm incoming.

[Marco]

Responded to:)

Marco.

[User211]

Marco it's a bank holiday.

Have a glass of wine or two and chill out a bit laterz at least:);)

[Marco]

Oh I've been doing that already, mate. Check out the weather thread!:D

Some things though are *important* and need stamping on quickly!!

Marco.

[Bigman80]

Responded to:)

Marco.[emoji106]

[Marco]

Anyway, the interesting thing from the poll so far is no-one considers that Peck deserves a chance to redeem himself, before I go legal on his ass, AND more importantly, that 33% of you so far [and probably rather more besides] agree that he is a very disturbed nutter!:D

Therefore Peck, as I know you'll be reading this...embrace and accept the fact that people think you are A VERY DISTURBED NUTTER, or to put it more politely, they believe that you have mental health issues, so SEEK HELP!!!

Marco.

[Gaz]

With respect, Gary, when you've been subjected to what I have from this scum, you're naturally going to be touchy about it. It's not about being unreasonable; it's about others who've never been a victim of this type of harassment having the common sense and sensitivity to understand that *any* attempt to sympathise with the offender or rationalise/justify his vile behaviour is naturally going to be frowned upon by me.

I trust you can appreciate that. The thread will therefore stay open as long as I consider necessary, and I don't give a toss what said loony thinks.

Marco.

I 100% agree. (Can't find a thumbs up emoji)

Just thinking of you and your position in this.

I fully understand you being defensive I just don't want you giving him ammunition

[Oddball]

Sounds a right tit

[Gazjam]

Marco,

He's living inside your head.
Don't let him.

sincerely...a friend.

[InThe Sticks]

Just ignore him. There are nutters in every walk of life, just be the bigger man and disregard the bait.
Most of use have better things to do with our lifes.

[crimsondonkey]

Just ignore him. There are nutters in every walk of life, just be the bigger man and disregard the bait.
Most of use have better things to do with our lifes.

Absolutely this.

Have the racist bile removed through legal redress but then move on and never look there again.

Let’s face it, now with he who shall not be named in a box six feet under, all that hate has to go somewhere and be focused on someone- don’t make the same mistake he did by falling into the trap of becoming obsessed with it all. Life is to too short to waste on haters.

[Gaz]

Both of the above were my initial reaction, sticks and stones etc.

But that's easy to say if you're not the one on the receiving end of 5 years of this, that's not a few throwaway remarks.

OK maybe there is some history but this character appears to have taken things to another level and, maybe even for his own good too, needs to be stopped by some means.

[Stratmangler]

Marco

You started a thread about it.
Your stalker won.

I can't understand why you'd go and join a forum that does not allow public viewing by non members.

[Marco]

Marco

You started a thread about it.
Your stalker won.

I can't understand why you'd go and join a forum that does not allow public viewing by non members.

Busy watching the footy on TV just now, so will comment on the most recent posts later [some good stuff too, I see], but just to address this.

Chris, I've joined no such forum, certainly not Peck's cesspit, so I don't know what you mean?:scratch: There are only two forums I'm a member of, here and pfm. I don't have time for anything else.

As for my stalker 'winning', well, we'll have to agree to disagree!:)

Marco.

[InThe Sticks]

OK maybe there is some history but this character appears to have taken things to another level and, maybe even for his own good too, needs to be stopped by some means.

Just handbags at dawn and not much else, if anything its just two people seeking attention for no other reason than boredom.
Out of all the things to be concerned about in life, this is just petty beyond belief.
Its just words on the internet, thats it! Really not worth the trouble to ones own karma.
Just ignore the bellend.

[Marco]

Just handbags at dawn and not much else, if anything its just two people seeking attention for no other reason than boredom.
Out of all the things to be concerned about in life, this is just petty beyond belief.
Its just words on the internet, thats it! Really not worth the trouble to ones own karma.
Just ignore the bellend.

Gary, I know your heart's in the right place, but I told someone else off earlier for being insensitive, and I'm afraid the bit I've highlighted comes under the exact same category. You've no idea what I've been subjected to from this idiot, other than the screenshots I've shown, so please don't dismiss it as "handbags" or "words on the Internet". It's FAR more than that (to me), as anyone else who's experienced similar knows.

And the seeking attention bit is just as bad, as that's fundamentally NOT what I'm doing. It always amazes me how folks who've not been subjected to this type of online harassment can be so blasé about it and its effects. Please show me some more consideration in future.

Marco.

[Marco]

Absolutely this.

Have the racist bile removed through legal redress but then move on and never look there again.

Let’s face it, now with he who shall not be named in a box six feet under, all that hate has to go somewhere and be focused on someone- don’t make the same mistake he did by falling into the trap of becoming obsessed with it all. Life is to too short to waste on haters.

Great post, and we are *totally* on the same page with that, especially your last sentence, which is why I'll be locking this thread when I feel that enough has been said [not far from that now], rather than using it as a platform from which to continually rant.

In terms of your point about falling into traps and becoming obsessed, again you are spot on. It's something that Peck needs to take a good look in the mirror at, as what he used to go on about to Richard Dunn, in terms of spending an inordinate amount of his life spewing hateful bile towards folk on his forum, HE is now guilty of doing to me!

It's a true saying that you rarely see yourself as you *really* are, and that certainly applies to him, because he's created at least three different pseudonyms on his forum [for reasons best known to him], all for the purpose of trolling me with abuse, and with TENS OF THOUSANDS of posts on each. He's in denial if he can't see the irony.

How much time must that have taken, both reading what I've written here, then posting about it? When he could've been doing something much more constructive with that time, such as spending it with his wife or son, doing something good. The real truth, therefore, is that spewing his hateful bile onto me, is ultimately doing HIM far more harm than me.

Marco.

[Gaz]

Gary, I know your heart's in the right place, but I told someone else off earlier for being insensitive, and I'm afraid the bit I've highlighted comes under the exact same category. You've no idea what I've been subjected to from this idiot, other than the screenshots I've shown, so please don't dismiss it as "handbags" or "words on the Internet". It's FAR more than that (to me), as anyone else who's experienced similar knows.

And the seeking attention bit is just as bad, as that's fundamentally NOT what I'm doing. It always amazes me how folks who've not been subjected to this type of online harassment can be so blasé about it and its effects. Please show me some more consideration in future.

Marco.

I didn't say that lol

[Barry]

I didn't say that lol

Marco's comments were addressed to another Gary (see post #80 supra).

[Marco]

Yup, I was referring to Gary 'In the Sticks'.

I did fully agree though, Gaz, with your earlier post (77), particularly the last part, which I've just touched upon. Peck needs to learn to enjoy life more, spend his spare time constructively and let go of his hate, or he'll end up like Richard Dunn, eventually dying as a sad, old and bitter man.

Gazjam (Gary) mentioned earlier that Peck was "living in my head", and I understand where he's coming from, but I'd argue that with over 94,000 posts in total, between all his (known) pseudonyms, spewing hateful bile in my direction, I'm living in HIS head, rather more than vice versa....

Marco.

[spendorman]

This is terrible, I have been bullied several times in my life, so can sympathise.

About 15 years ago I was bullied by a resident in my road, he was a policeman! I went round to the local Police station and reported him and what he'd done. The bullying stopped. Some time later I said to another neighbour, "Not seen the policeman guy for some time." The reply was amusing, "didn't you know, he's been imprisoned for misappropriating Police funds."

[Gaz]

OK, sorry and thanks

[guy]

Marco,
In your first post you say:

"The name of this troll is Graham Peck, A,K.A Rudolph Hucker, Mike Oxbig, Chris P Bacon, and many other 'inventive' titles."

Is Darkharlequin also one of his "nom de plumes"? - rather a lot of the offensive racist terms seem to be posted under that name.
If more than one person is posting, I would think that reporting the matter to the police would be the most effective way of getting all concerned taken to task for their behaviour.

[Marco]

Marco,
In your first post you say:

"The name of this troll is Graham Peck, A,K.A Rudolph Hucker, Mike Oxbig, Chris P Bacon, and many other 'inventive' titles."

Is Darkharlequin also one of his "nom de plumes"? - rather a lot of the offensive racist terms seem to be posted under that name.
If more than one person is posting, I would think that reporting the matter to the police would be the most effective way of getting all concerned taken to task for their behaviour.

Indeed Guy, and you're certainly right about the offensive racist remarks. No, I don't think that DH has anything to do with Peck, as racist remarks aside, he doesn't have the imagination or intelligence to write what DH has in other posts. That's not to say though that DH is particularly intelligent, ('she' apparently) isn't, just that Peck's considerably dumber, and even less literate.

And on the suggestion that DH is female, which 'she' herself claims, then all I can say is that I've never encountered such a racist potty-mouthed woman in all my life! Some of the pure bile 'she' has spewed onto that site beggars belief, and 'she' also suffers from the same hate issues as Peck. No, if I were a betting man, I'd bet that DH has an even hairier arse and deeper voice than me!:eyebrows:

Marco.

[Marco]

Btw, just to factually correct some amusing remarks Peck made, in one of the screenshots I posted, about our "shitty old cloth sofas"... Our sofas and matching recliner chairs (mostly hidden in the pic he's referring to) are from Laura Ashley, and in the fabric and style we chose were nearly nearly £4k: https://www.lauraashley.com/en-gb/fabric-ranges/kingston-upholstered/49

We dislike leather sofas, as they feel 'cold'. not warm and comfy, like more traditional stuff, and also, in our opinion, leather is the rather vulgar badge of chavs!;) The curtains are also Laura Ashley, and even the curtain poles and ceiling light are bespoke handmade wrought-iron items from Nigel Tyas: https://www.nigeltyas.co.uk/

The wood burner is a top-of-the range model from Charnwood, and reassuringly expensive:eyebrows:https://www.charnwood.com/

As for the rest of the stated "skip material", the room is full of many genuine antiques, dating from as early as the 17th century, including an oak coffee table, Windsor chair and genuine Welsh dresser, the value of which an uncultured and ignorant oik such as him would have no concept of.

The "£200 quid TV" is actually a £900 Sony 4K HDR model, which is plenty big enough for our needs. Unlike inside the homes of Essex chavs, in our house huge mass-produced plastic TVs aren't considered as an asset [far less a status symbol], but rather an eyesore, and so aren't the main focal point. That honour is reserved for our beautiful inglenook fireplace and wood burner, with an original water-colour painting of Llangollen above, done by an acclaimed local artist:)

The doors in our lounge are all original Victorian, fitted with beautiful stained-glass panels, all bespoke and handmade to our spec from a specialist antiques supplier. And lastly (although I could mention lots more), there's a £3k home-cinema system in there too, which plays movies and music to a very high standard. And I won't even mention our £40K brand new bespoke handmade kitchen, just next door.....

Therefore Peck's ridiculing of our possessions, simply showcases his total buffoonery and ignorance!!:D

I shall banish a few more of his myths tomorrow.

Marco.

P.S I wouldn't normally be so vulgar as to mention these things, or prices, but feel sure that he'll approve.

[Patrick Dixon]

... and also, in our opinion, leather is the rather vulgar badge of chavs!

So your car interior is ... laura ashley?

(Patrick, curious chav)

[Roy S]

Live in Essex - check

Black leather sofas - check

Huge mass produced plastic telly - check (but it is a Sony)

Oh dear, I seem to be a stereotype [emoji6]

[Pigmy Pony]

Live in Essex - check

Black leather sofas - check

Huge mass produced plastic telly - check (but it is a Sony)

Oh dear, I seem to be a stereotype [emoji6]

What about your car? Furry dice? Or what about one of those tinted visors with your name at one end and Sharon at the other?

[Roy S]

What about your car? Furry dice? Or what about one of those tinted visors with your name at one end and Sharon at the other?

No furry dice but my mk1 Escort had ‘go faster’ stripes that I applied so they were a bit wobbly.

[oldius]

This seems to be turning into a somewhat comedic thread. I don't think that does the issue justice and could be perceived as an acceptance of the content as back and forth banter.

[Pigmy Pony]

This seems to be turning into a somewhat comedic thread. I don't think that does the issue justice and could be perceived as an acceptance of the content as back and forth banter.

Sorry about that Geoff - kids will be kids when the adults leave the room. No one is trying to make light of the problem, but Marco kind of opened the door with the comment about "Essex chavs".

Marco, you really don't need to tell us about your stuff, we all know you don't buy crap :)

[Gaz]

Btw, just to factually correct some amusing remarks Peck made, in one of the screenshots I posted, about our "shitty old cloth sofas"... Our sofas and matching recliner chairs (mostly hidden in the pic he's referring to) are from Laura Ashley, and in the fabric and style we chose, were nearly nearly £4k: https://www.lauraashley.com/en-gb/fabric-ranges/kingston-upholstered/49

We hate leather sofas, as they feel 'cold'. not warm and comfy, like more traditional stuff, and also, in our opinion, leather is the rather vulgar badge of chavs!;) The curtains are also Laura Ashley, and even the curtain poles and ceiling light are bespoke handmade wrought iron items from Nigel Tyas: https://www.nigeltyas.co.uk/

The wood burner is a top-of-the range model from Charnwood, and which is reassuringly expensive: https://www.charnwood.com/

As for the rest of the "skip material", the room is full of many genuine antiques, dating from as early as the 17th century, including an oak coffee table, Windsor chair and genuine Welsh dresser, the value of which an uncultured and ignorant oik such as him would have no concept of.

The "£200 quid TV" is actually a £900 Sony 4K HDR model, which is plenty big enough for our needs, as unlike inside the homes of Essex chavs, in our house huge mass-produced plastic TVs aren't considered as an asset, but rather an eyesore, and so aren't the main focal point. That honour is reserved for our beautiful inglenook fireplace and wood burner, with an original water-colour painting of Llangollen above:)

The doors in our lounge are all original Victorian, fitted with beautiful stained-glass panels, all bespoke and handmade to our spec from a specialist antiques supplier. And lastly (although I could mention lots more), there's a £3k home-cinema system in there too, which plays movies and music to a very high standard. And I won't even mention our £40K brand new bespoke handmade kitchen, just next door.....

Therefore Peck's ridiculing of our possessions, simply showcases his total buffoonery and ignorance!!:D

I shall banish a few more of his myths tomorrow.

Marco.

P.S I wouldn't normally be so vulgar as to mention prices, but feel sure that he'll approve.

You don't need to justify what you have in your house to us, certainly not him or anybody else. As long as you're happy with it don't give some sad Internet weirdo the satisfaction of responding to him. (again we need a thumbs up emoji)

[crimsondonkey]

Btw, just to factually correct some amusing remarks Peck made, in one of the screenshots I posted, about our "shitty old cloth sofas"... Our sofas and matching recliner chairs (mostly hidden in the pic he's referring to) are from Laura Ashley, and in the fabric and style we chose, were nearly nearly £4k: https://www.lauraashley.com/en-gb/fabric-ranges/kingston-upholstered/49

We hate leather sofas, as they feel 'cold'. not warm and comfy, like more traditional stuff, and also, in our opinion, leather is the rather vulgar badge of chavs!;) The curtains are also Laura Ashley, and even the curtain poles and ceiling light are bespoke handmade wrought iron items from Nigel Tyas: https://www.nigeltyas.co.uk/

The wood burner is a top-of-the range model from Charnwood, and which is reassuringly expensive: https://www.charnwood.com/

As for the rest of the "skip material", the room is full of many genuine antiques, dating from as early as the 17th century, including an oak coffee table, Windsor chair and genuine Welsh dresser, the value of which an uncultured and ignorant oik such as him would have no concept of.

The "£200 quid TV" is actually a £900 Sony 4K HDR model, which is plenty big enough for our needs, as unlike inside the homes of Essex chavs, in our house huge mass-produced plastic TVs aren't considered as an asset, but rather an eyesore, and so aren't the main focal point. That honour is reserved for our beautiful inglenook fireplace and wood burner, with an original water-colour painting of Llangollen above:)

The doors in our lounge are all original Victorian, fitted with beautiful stained-glass panels, all bespoke and handmade to our spec from a specialist antiques supplier. And lastly (although I could mention lots more), there's a £3k home-cinema system in there too, which plays movies and music to a very high standard. And I won't even mention our £40K brand new bespoke handmade kitchen, just next door.....

Therefore Peck's attempted ridicule of some of our possessions as "skip material", simply showcases his total ignorance!!:D

I shall banish a few more of his myths tomorrow.

Marco.

P.S I wouldn't normally be so vulgar as to mention prices, but feel sure that he'll approve.

Mate, you shouldn’t have to prove anything, responding like this is falling into the trap of effectively opening a dialogue. Don’t feed the troll.

I understand feeling the need to set the record straight, but no one wins and everyone loses in a tit for tat exchange of posts on the internet.

If you want to take a bit of control then report the site for spreading hate, delete the thread, move on - end of sad episode.

[Roy S]

This seems to be turning into a somewhat comedic thread. I don't think that does the issue justice and could be perceived as an acceptance of the content as back and forth banter.

Flippancy was not my intention, apologies to Marco if it came across as such, I was merely trying to lighten the mood.

[Pigmy Pony]

You don't need to justify what you have in your house to us, certainly not him or anybody else. As long as you're happy with it don't give some sad Internet weirdo the satisfaction of responding to him. (again we need a thumbs up emoji)

Here Gary, have this one :thumbsup:

[Wakefield Turntables]

Btw, just to factually correct some amusing remarks Peck made, in one of the screenshots I posted, about our "shitty old cloth sofas"... Our sofas and matching recliner chairs (mostly hidden in the pic he's referring to) are from Laura Ashley, and in the fabric and style we chose, were nearly nearly £4k: https://www.lauraashley.com/en-gb/fabric-ranges/kingston-upholstered/49

We hate leather sofas, as they feel 'cold'. not warm and comfy, like more traditional stuff, and also, in our opinion, leather is the rather vulgar badge of chavs!;) The curtains are also Laura Ashley, and even the curtain poles and ceiling light are bespoke handmade wrought iron items from Nigel Tyas: https://www.nigeltyas.co.uk/

The wood burner is a top-of-the range model from Charnwood, and which is reassuringly expensive: https://www.charnwood.com/

As for the rest of the "skip material", the room is full of many genuine antiques, dating from as early as the 17th century, including an oak coffee table, Windsor chair and genuine Welsh dresser, the value of which an uncultured and ignorant oik such as him would have no concept of.

The "£200 quid TV" is actually a £900 Sony 4K HDR model, which is plenty big enough for our needs, as unlike inside the homes of Essex chavs, in our house huge mass-produced plastic TVs aren't considered as an asset, but rather an eyesore, and so aren't the main focal point. That honour is reserved for our beautiful inglenook fireplace and wood burner, with an original water-colour painting of Llangollen above:)

The doors in our lounge are all original Victorian, fitted with beautiful stained-glass panels, all bespoke and handmade to our spec from a specialist antiques supplier. And lastly (although I could mention lots more), there's a £3k home-cinema system in there too, which plays movies and music to a very high standard. And I won't even mention our £40K brand new bespoke handmade kitchen, just next door.....

Therefore Peck's ridiculing of our possessions, simply showcases his total buffoonery and ignorance!!:D

I shall banish a few more of his myths tomorrow.

Marco.

P.S I wouldn't normally be so vulgar as to mention prices, but feel sure that he'll approve.

You've pretty much just walked straight into his trap. Incidentally, I own a £6K leather chesterfield settee etc and I'm not a CHAV. Do you not think, to a certain extent your copying the behaviour of your troll? It's hard, but walk away and raise yourself above the situation.

[oldius]

My recommendation would be to close the thread and get it back to what it was.

[Wakefield Turntables]

My recommendation would be to close the thread and get it back to what it was.

+1 i think a lot of opinions have been cast, generating a good consensus of opinion which now needs to assessed and acted upon.

[Pigmy Pony]

My recommendation would be to close the thread and get it back to what it was.

I agree. All I'm thinking about now is Peck getting a kick out of this thread.

[Gaz]

Here Gary, have this one :thumbsup:

Where did you find that?

I want one

[Pigmy Pony]

Where did you find that?

I want one

If you click on the "reply with quote" tab TWICE, the emojis will appear. That's what happens with me anyway.

[Marco]

Oh dear, I fear that some of you have misread the entirely tongue-in-cheek nature of my earlier post!!!!:eek::doh::doh::lol:

It was a total piss take! Not that Peck, of course, didn't need a little 'educating'...

Anyway, note to self: don't make any attempts at irony just before I go to bed!:doh::spank:

Marco [loves "Essex chavs":kiss::kiss:]

[Marco]

Oh, and guys, thanks for all your PMs and words of support therein. I may not get to reply to them all, but the sentiments are very much appreciated:)

Marco.

[Pigmy Pony]

God bless you, good to see you're still smiling! :)

[struth]

Hahaha... Oh dear, I think some of you have misread the entirely tongue-in-cheek nature of my earlier post!!!!:eek::doh::doh::lol:

It was a total piss take! Not that Peck, of course, didn't need a little 'educating'...

Anyway, note to self: don't make any attempts at irony just before you go to bed!:doh::spank:

Marco [loves "Essex chavs":kiss::kiss:]

yup, i took it as tic...or i'd have to order a hit:ner:

[Marco]

God bless you, good to see you're still smiling! :)

Lol - jeez, I have been throughout this whole thread!! That's the problem with 'words on a screen': they can never successfully convey the writer's intent or, most importantly, his or her mood. Grant knows me well, and how I think, so it's no surprise that him and I were on the same page.

We both share the same 'Scottish daftee gene'!!:D

More seriously, rest assured, that *I* have gained out of this thread EXACTLY what *I* wanted (which I'll outline later). Anyone who really knows me, will know that. And so I don't give a the slightest FLYING FUCK what my detractors assume or think, trust me! In over 20 years of posting on audio forums, I've seen off far bigger foes than Peck.

Marco.

[Firebottle]

I bet he's only got a little willie.

[Marco]

Hahaha... Too true!:lol:

And he's already confessed that he only uses it now for pissing and wanking.

Marco.

[Gaz]

Hahaha... Too true!:lol:

And he's already confessed that he only uses it now for pissing and wanking.

Marco.

And his hand usually falls asleep during the latter.


Worst still when it wakes up it says it's had better


That's what I heard anyway

[Pigmy Pony]

I bet he's only got a little willie.

Yes he has an abbreviated pecker. Abbreviated to Peck.

[Marco]

Ok folks, this thread has now served its purpose, so time to draw it to a close.

Summary - what’d been achieved:

* The public exposure of Graham Peck's racist and abusive sociopathic behaviour.

* The erosion of Graham Peck's anonymity, used for the purposes of trolling, with his home location in Sweden now placed in the public domain. Hopefully now he'll be less inclined to troll or abuse anyone else.

* His vile hating and abusive website is set to be taken down.

* His employer could potentially be made aware of his distasteful Internet activity, and racist and abusive behaviour.

* A complaint will be forwarded to his ISP, in reference to his unlawful use of their facilities, and a C&E letter will be sent to his home address, as outlined, from my solicitors.

Most importantly, however, I've had the immense pleasure of telling him a few ‘home truths’, which he was badly in need of hearing, and now feel much better for it!! Plus, I have the smug satisfaction of knowing that I'm in a far happier place in my life now than he'll ever be:eyebrows:

Job done:)

Marco.

[Marco]

The stalking and harassment is still continuing, so from now on everything viewable that Graham Peck posts on Snakeoilaudio (under the guise of 'isaac hunt', or otherwise) will be published here.

Once again he's deleted most of what was there before [for fear of being sued, thus demonstrating his guilt], but from now on all of his viewable posts will be copied and pasted here for reference, both so that people can see the type of person he is, but most importantly in readiness now to pursue with suing him for slander and online defamation:

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/922/RVboQA.png

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/924/X6QPBp.png

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/923/8pZON5.png

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/921/R1M4ps.png

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/924/GPpKNp.png

I'll leave you to judge who needs the shrink.

Marco.

P.S It should be noted, in reference to his malicious accusation of "sniffing" and "wanking over" the underwear of a minor, that like me, my wife was an only child, *and as such has no sister*, let alone an imaginary one, who has an equally imaginary 14-year old daughter. Those of you who know me, will already be aware of those facts, and which of course could be easily proven.

In any case, it constitutes as pure defamation, so with that and all other actionable material I've saved from his site to date, I now have sufficient evidence to proceed with suing him for online defamation, plus continued stalking and harassment, and so he'll be hearing from my solicitor in due course.

[Marco]

https://www.dma-law.co.uk/can-i-be-sued-for-online-defamation/

Marco.

[Marco]

And it continues.... More evidence to support my case for defamation and harassment:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/924/LtMGuj.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/923/6bPauG.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/922/rwD7YF.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/924/5ZWNoi.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/921/0xek9T.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/921/KafVcc.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/924/IddsnZ.png

Now it's the publishing of private messages in the public domain, which he's received in confidence from members of his site, in order to further his campaign of harassment. Also note his malicious intent, in terms of his seeking to "destroy" my marriage, and the publishing of a link to my wife's Facebook account.

The above acts as yet more evidence of him stalking and defaming my wife, and now threats from him of harassing my father [any letters he receives of the nature stated, will be used as further evidence to support my case against him]. Note the above racist abuse too, with references to my wife as a "foreign fucker", and a "scot basterds bitch". For starters, publishing those racist remarks on his site, no matter who wrote them, is illegal. He's in charge of its contents, and therefore adopts full responsibility for them.

In any case, the more that he persists with his defamation and harassment, the more it will be published here and used as evidence against him.

Furthermore, every time this thread is added to/bumped, the more Graham Peck's name, attached to the subject of stalking and harassment, will appear on Google searches. Therefore, I'm sure that at some point his wife, boss or someone else important to him, will discover this information and his online activities in that respect.

Search for 'Graham Peck', and watch the contents of this thread climb up the pages: https://www.google.com/search?q=graham+peck&sxsrf=ACYBGNTqptWFP1D2TyaYJgVYohBEm8YBdQ:158084940 6186&ei=_tg5XpqCC5WM1fAPod2swA0&start=60&sa=N&ved=2ahUKEwia-bH64rjnAhUVRhUIHaEuC9g4MhDy0wN6BAgMEDs&biw=1309&bih=696

Simply add the word 'troll' to the search criteria, and Graham Peck's name (together with this thread) appears on Page 1: https://www.google.com/search?q=graham+peck%2C+troll&oq=graham+peck%2C+troll&aqs=chrome..69i57j33.5439j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

For reference, so that these images will be linked to the existing available data on him, this is Graham Peck (also known under the alter-egos of Rudolph Hucker, isaac hunt, mike oxbig and Chris P Bacon) :

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/xq90/921/IlHRsz.png https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/xq90/923/5YfHKO.jpg

Marco.

[Marco]

More... He's now guilty of false association (and also publishing my full name and address on his site, which I have saved screenshots of, showing those details):

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/921/5GPz2M.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/924/iMM2VS.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/923/VNIi9x.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/923/sGxmL4.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/923/3vSR6y.png

Marco.

[Marco]

More, this time with threats of violence from his son....

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/923/54VQKi.png

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/921/eQwHbg.png

So in the space of a few hours, we've gone from: "get back to ripping into this pos now" to: "i have had enough of interacting on hifi forums".

Hmm... I wonder what could've caused such a volte face?:hmm:

I think it's obvious to everyone who the loser is. And as far as "interacting on hifi forums" goes, that's a laugh!

There are many more words one could use to accurately describe the published output above from Graham Peck, and what snakeoilaudio constitutes as. "Hi-fi forum", I'd suggest, is somewhat stretching the boundaries of lateral thinking.

Never mind, it won't take a month or two for him to receive the Cease and Desist letter from my solicitor, which he can look forward to popping through his door soon.

Marco.

[Marco]

More.... This time Graham Peck is pretending to be Andre [easily provable in any subsequent investigation by the authorities], and also posting under his alter-ego of Mike Oxbig:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/921/oapOow.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/921/NDorMF.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/924/BYrtJH.png

The "2-month holiday" lasted long!!:lol:

Thus proving that the only 'no-life loser' is Graham Peck, as he's got nothing else better to do but stalk and harass people. Graham peck the Internet troll with no life.

Keep it up, Graham Peck. It's yet more evidence of harassment and defamation I can use against you, Graham Peck, and gives me cause to bump this thread and keep it high up in Google searches. The whole world is slowly finding out what you are, Graham Peck:)

Marco.

[Marco]

Oh look, it's at the top of the page now: https://www.google.com/search?q=graham+peck&sxsrf=ACYBGNTqptWFP1D2TyaYJgVYohBEm8YBdQ:158084940 6186&ei=_tg5XpqCC5WM1fAPod2swA0&start=60&sa=N&ved=2ahUKEwia-bH64rjnAhUVRhUIHaEuC9g4MhDy0wN6BAgMEDs&biw=1309&bih=696

This is like the UK chart show, but in the final countdown, the 'new entry' from Graham Peck, the Internet Troll from Sweden, will be a No1...!;)

Marco.

[Marco]

More harassment, defamation, racism and libel from Graham Peck....

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/921/7danEm.png

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/923/t59YEe.png

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/923/7pkswa.png

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/921/VCNsdb.png


Well that was another short holiday!! :lol::lol::mental:

Mid-March my arse..... Come on, you know what they say, when you're in a hole, keep digging! And true to form, he gets the shovel out again...


http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/923/esm8lP.png http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/924/pprxyt.png

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/922/IXu5cc.png

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/922/2HzArh.png

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/922/puBRtU.png

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/922/kWxkeZ.png

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/924/X171NX.png

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/923/Uh7Lpe.png

Done, eh? You mean just like you said 10 minutes ago??:D

No, you'll be at it again as soon as you're up - nothing surer, as it's what trolls like you live for, isn't it, Graham Peck? All the chav possessions in your garden shed won't make up for how obviously unhappy and unfulfilled you are, eh Graham Peck?

So keep it coming, Graham Peck - the more the merrier, as all the evidence I'm gathering will be invaluable when I sue you. Watch out for the letter from my solicitor, Graham Peck... I'll be waiting for you one day soon when you come home from work.

Marco.

[Marco]

"Middle of March I'll pop back" - Graham Peck...

Posted YESTERDAY (19th February):

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/922/2md2yM.png

As I said, middle of March, my arse. Graham Peck just can't help himself.

Graham Peck's obviously got mixed up between February and March. That's dimwittedness for you, possibly combined with the early signs of dementia, plus having no life outside of working... Quite clearly, Graham Peck, the Internet troll, can't survive without posting on his scum forum. Shame, as it will closed down very soon.

Marco.

[Marco]

Yet more harassment:

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/921/sJygy1.png

Keep the evidence coming... :thumbsup:

Marco.

[Marco]

Yet more unprovoked harassment, abuse and defamation from Graham Peck, the Internet troll from Sweden:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/922/1m5tao.png

Page 3 now, and climbing.... https://www.google.com/search?q=graham+peck&sxsrf=ALeKk01xq2wO_PKIWDbYC0mS0KK5TBnEew:158249539 0732&ei=nvZSXp23LIqN1fAPrtS_2Ao&start=20&sa=N&ved=2ahUKEwid_v3c1ujnAhWKRhUIHS7qD6s4ChDy0wN6BAgME DI&biw=1309&bih=696

"Raging fucking loony", you just gotta love the irony!!!

Glad to see though that Graham Peck, the Internet troll from Sweden, is ensuring he's earning enough money to pay for my damages, when I sue him for harassment... Homeless, bankrupt-boy, will soon be Graham Peck's new title...

Marco.

[Marco]

Graham Peck wrote YESTERDAY:

"ok i'm out
will post some pictures of my 30k dream muscle car when i put it back in traffic first week in april..let them 2 utter twats see what hard work gets u in life.
see ya april"

Last time Graham Peck said he was off until mid-March, then reappeared days later in mid-February.Yesterday, it was "see ya April", but Graham Peck's back again today, with yer more of his unprovoked harassment, thus demonstrating that he just can't keep away from his scum 'forum'., as he has NO LIFE, no marital relationship worthy of the name, and nothing else to do with his time, outside of working:

So Today [not sometime in April, as promised] Graham Peck the Internet Troll wrote:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/921/tJfjX1.png

Thanks to the contents of this thread, Graham Peck's harassment and abuse is all over Google, so I'm sure the info will pop up sometime soon [perhaps when least expected], when Graham Peck's wife, Graham Peck's boss or someone else who knows Graham Peck personally, but doesn't know the vile behaviour Graham Peck gets up to, whilst hiding behind his computer, searches on Google for anything relating to the name "Graham Peck".

Top of Page 3 now, and climbing fast: https://www.google.com/search?q=graham+peck&sxsrf=ALeKk03W4r1Q1ze8uwdvqpgaZCcYDjViPQ:158266791 7673&ei=jZhVXpPSKJOdgQaj3IKIBQ&start=20&sa=N&ved=2ahUKEwjTzJ642e3nAhWTTsAKHSOuAFE4ChDy0wN6BAgME DM&biw=1309&bih=696

Keep the evidence coming, and your harassing and abusive activities all over Google for everyone to find, Graham Peck... :thumbsup:

Marco.

[Marco]

Yet more harassment and abuse from Graham Peck, the cowardly (self-confessed impotent) Internet troll from Sweden. Plus once again with racist references to "nig nog wheels". Graham Peck clearly has issues with black people, and so racist remarks like that alone will lead to his downfall.

Quite clearly also, Graham Peck can't keep away from his scum 'forum' because Graham Peck has nothing else better to do with his spare time other than, completely unprovoked, stalk and harass people:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/923/RLSykX.png


https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/921/qLaqQS.png

However, Graham Peck, the cowardly (self-confessed impotent) Internet troll from Sweden, is clearly also a master of unintended irony... I'd contend that to any neutral observer, it's obvious who the "online raging fucking twat" is...

Graham Peck claims that others have 'no life', yet on his scum 'forum' has created and posted under at least SIX DIFFERENT MULTIPLE PERSONAS [easily provable, however, in any legal investigation, as being him, as the writing style and language used is IDENTICAL], generating over 100,000 POSTS between them on the same subjects, ad nauseam, the majority of which are libellous and actionable, and which have been saved as evidence to use against him, and in the process has spent 100s OF HOURS of his 'life' doing so.

Quite simply, only TROLLS hide behind VPNs and use false identities. Therefore, the question that begs asking is why would someone who *genuinely* has a life, WASTE so much of it behaving like that...?:hmm:

On the contrary, I'd suggest that only someone who has NO LIFE, and who hasn't got anything else better to do, would waste so much of it, sat behind a computer, stalking and harassing people. Therefore, Graham Peck, the cowardly (self-confessed impotent) Internet troll from Sweden, really needs to take a long hard look in the mirror, and see WHO *really* has NO LIFE, or instead start acting like someone who does.

Marco.

[Marco]

Let's remind everyone again what Graham Peck, the (self-confessed impotent) Internet troll from Sweden looks like:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/xq90/921/IlHRsz.png https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/xq90/923/5YfHKO.jpg

Marco.

[Marco]

Yet more stalking and online harassment from Graham Peck, the (self-confessed *IMPOTENT*) troll from Sweden, this time with further defamation and references to "pedos" and "kiddy fiddlers":

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/921/LfSDuf.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/923/8DADG7.png

Those remarks portray deliberate malicious intent and will almost certainly be viewed as such if this gets to court, which will depend on whether or not Graham Peck the (self-confessed *IMPOTENT*) troll from Sweden, complies with the demands set out in the cease & desist letter he receives from my solicitor.

However, for sheer comedic value, the catalogue of unintentional irony continues, with Graham Peck the (self-confessed *IMPOTENT*) troll from Sweden, continuing to go on about others "spewing bile" and having "zero life", whilst evidence clearly shows Graham Peck the (self-confessed *IMPOTENT*) troll from Sweden, spending the majority of his so-called 'life' hiding behind his computer, like a coward, stalking, harassing and defaming people, and indeed spewing the biggest load of barely-intelligible bile imaginable.

So how does that work?:hmm: Of course he's the consummate Captain of Unintentional Irony.

The fact is, if Graham Peck (the self-confessed *IMPOTENT) troll from Sweden, *actually* had a life, he'd be doing something more constructive with it, such as spending the time instead with his son, who's love he makes futile attempts to buy with expensive toys, and his (one would assume) sexually frustrated wife.

Anyway, I look forward to saving yet more valuable evidence with which to sue Graham Peck, the (self-confessed *IMPOTENT*) troll from Sweden, for harassment and defamation. The stronger my case is against him, the more the likelihood is of bankrupting him with the costs of damages and court fees, and so pretty soon his wooden shed will be downgraded to a cardboard box.

Marco.

[Marco]

Yet more evidence to support my case against Graham Peck the (self-confessed *IMPOTENT*) troll from Sweden:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/922/5UvrT5.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/924/pnuv2L.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/924/F7yb6P.png

It's pointless commenting on the above, as it's patently obvious to any intelligent person that Graham Peck, the (self-confessed *IMPOTENT*) troll from Sweden, is largely taking about himself, but is too blinkered to see it. Among other mental health issues, he clearly suffers from Schizoid Personality Disorder: https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/mental-health-schizoid-personality-disorder#1 coupled with tastes in interior décor typical of a vulgar Essex chav.

Regardless, everyone who reads this thread, or finds it on Google [or via other search engines] will know *exactly* what kind of a human being Graham Peck the (self-confessed *IMPOTENT*)
schizoid troll from Sweden is...

And soon so will Marie Peck, when she receives printouts of every screenshot I've taken of her *IMPOTENT* husband's stalking and abusive online behaviour, and asks him to log into his admin account on Snakeoil, for her to view his posting history under various different false identities, and so sees for herself exactly what her *IMPOTENT* schizoid husband has been up to behind her back. The screenshots will also include where he has openly discussed their non-existent sex life and his impotency.

Multiple copies of these screenshots will be sent at various intervals, via Royal Mail's International Tracked & Signed service, to Graham Peck's home address, but addressed to Marie Peck, and requiring her signature for delivery, so that Graham Peck won't know when to try and intercept them.

Marco.

[Marco]

It's such a lovely sunny day today in Wrexham, so I'm humming a happy little tune... It's called the BT Internet Boogie (Warwick Road Remix):

"Roger Needham and Siobhan McGinley up a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G. She's making felt goats, while he's stalking me, K-I-S-S-I-N-G. What will she do when she discovers what dodgy Roger's been up to, I don't know, but all her KISSING might well go..."

:gig:

I wonder if it's as sunny today in Leytonstone?:)

Marco.

[Marco]

More from Graham Peck, the (self-confessed *IMPOTENT*) troll from Sweden:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/922/8aCYfL.png

:lol::lol::lol:

No idea who that bloke is, or anyone else featured in the pic. However, I can state as FACT that he has nothing to do with me! So whoever is giving Graham Peck his information is as BRAINLESS as he is.

Keep up the comedy though, and look out for the screenshots I've sent your wife. They'll be popping through the door soon....

Marco.

[Marco]

And....

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/922/oOznC9.png

You mean exactly like how YOU have published MY details in the first post on your "Marco Pieracinni" thread?

I agree about no-one caring - I certainly don't! But it's yet more evidence of your continual harassment and attempts to apply one law to suit you, and another for me. I also noticed how much you 'didn't care' last time when a picture of your house and full postal address was shown... On the contrary, you were going off your nut!:D

So you're convincing no-one, in that respect.

And...

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/921/X8MluP.png

Firstly, Megan Wilson was my mother-in-law's name, and she's dead! And you do realise that my wife was an ONLY CHILD, and so had no 'sister'? That kind of kills your 'panty sniffing' accusations in reference to her 'young niece' (whom you wrongly believed to be Megan Wilson) stone dead. And of course all of this is easily provable.

As I've said, whoever is feeding you this bullshit is as brainless as you are. It does, however, add to the pool of evidence I have against you for harassment, defamation and malicious intent, which I *WILL* be suing you for. Make no mistake about that!

Secondly, it demonstrates just the kind of SCUMBAG you are, by showing your intentions towards harassing my father, an 87-year old man, who's got nothing whatsoever to do with this conflict. If you do though, he'll just laugh, I promise you, as my wife did when you harassed her on Facebook and Linkedin, in a futile attempt to get at me.

Listen up, IMPOTENT-boy, and listen well... Both of them know that you're a no-life schizoid nutcase, and so will pay ZERO attention to anything you have to say. Hokey, cokey?:)

However, the more evidence you continue to provide me of your online stalking, harassment and defamation, the worse it will be for you.

Marco.

[Marco]

And:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1024x768q90/923/hEoMwn.png

Graham Peck, this is the last time I'll be addressing you directly, as from now on, this thread will be used solely for storing screenshot evidence of your online stalking, harassment and defamation.

In reference to the above... You really have very little grasp on reality, don't you?

Can't you see that YOU are the one with a pretend 'hi-fi forum', in reality created to provide you with a platform to spend countless hours maliciously attacking people you hate, in the sole company now of (soon to be sued, like you) Roger G Needham/Siobhan McGinley, posing as 'DarKHarlequiN' (previously 'TheMooN', on AoS - it was that most unusual use of capital letters at the beginning and end of random words that done for him in the end), as everyone else who used to post on your 'forum' is well gone, including your old friend Andre?

That's all down to YOU. Therefore, I guarantee it's not going to be me and Grant left on our own on AoS. It'll be YOU and Roger Needham/Siobhan McGinley, posing as 'DarkHarleQuiN' on your joke 'forum', until such times as I prevent you both, legally, from doing so. That's the future.

And what has Grant (Struth) ever done to you, much like my dad or my wife? So if you're the man you claim to be, then leave them out of this conflict. The only reason I sent Marie those screenshots is because YOU brought my wife into our conflict by harassing her on Facebook and Linkedin, in order to try and 'damage' me somehow, so I've given you a taste of your own medicine.

Now allow me to give you the FACTS about my supposed 'stolen forum'...

The fact is, I bought this place from Steve Toy in 2009 (when he was officially the sole owner), for a price that we BOTH agreed at the time was fair, and that HE was HAPPY with, based on the fact that I was more responsible than him for building the place up in the early days, and had done the bulk of the work in that respect, *exactly* as it was when we ran Hi-Fi Corner together all those years ago. You did next to bugger all, while Fliterlab (Rob), Steve Toy and me created a forum for YOU that was worth having, until things went tits up, largely down to YOU.

So I've 'stolen" nothing, and if you contact Steve Toy, and ask him for yourself, he'll tell you the same.

As for this Camaro nonsense, and all the other expensive toys you've posted countless pictures of, or your claimed wealth, I *honestly* don't give a damn, as quite clearly, none of it has made you happy. Unlike you, I don't need to be 'rich' to be happy.

Perhaps if you spent MORE time driving your Camaro, ENJOYING LIFE (and the money you have now), in the company of your wife and kids, doing nice things together, instead of working yourself into an early grave, obsessing about becoming a millionaire, and LESS time online maliciously stalking and harassing others and me, you'd be happier...??

Now the next time you'll be hearing from me will be from my solicitor.

Marco.