j.postema
27-01-2019, 17:36
Hi all,
I've built my own pair of full-range electrostatic loudspeakes. I'm quite happy with them and they are big (door size) panels. Although stats can be difficult to drive my current aplifier seems to have no problems at all driving them. It is a Harman Kardon HK680 integrated amplifier. If I'm correct is has a positive review: (not sure if the source is reliable)
https://www.tnt-audio.com/ampli/hk680_e.html
As always - I'm wondering if there is room to improve things. I would think the living room where my audio system is intalled is the foremost important factor and I didn't do much about room treatment. As this is my third pair of DIY stats I think it would be quite difficult to make big improvements here. (although I have plans to build new panels).
I use a budget CD player (Marantz CD5001) and an old but fine turntable (Pioneer PLD12D with AT100e cartridge) I guess at the source there is room for improvement.
But how about the amplifier? When reading reviews I read a lot of subjective terms describing different amplifiers. At the other side there are people that tell each amplifier should sound (almost) equal as it just aplifies the signal - nothing more.
Then there is the factor of load - electrostats are well know for being a more diffult (capacitive) load compared to magnetic loudspeakers (resistive). And electrostats are well know for being (very) resolving. Would this mean there is room for improvement and would it be worth the effort to upgrade my HK680 amplifier?
Ideally I would select up to five to ten different amplifiers and compare them at home. But I guess this will be difficult - if not imposible. It would be difficult to bring them to an good audio store as well. I always prefer to test things by myself and alone.
So to summarize my question: do you think an amplifier upgrade can result in a clear audible improvement in my case? And what amplifiers would qualify for this? For instance, would a Quad 606 MKII qualify?
I've built my own pair of full-range electrostatic loudspeakes. I'm quite happy with them and they are big (door size) panels. Although stats can be difficult to drive my current aplifier seems to have no problems at all driving them. It is a Harman Kardon HK680 integrated amplifier. If I'm correct is has a positive review: (not sure if the source is reliable)
https://www.tnt-audio.com/ampli/hk680_e.html
As always - I'm wondering if there is room to improve things. I would think the living room where my audio system is intalled is the foremost important factor and I didn't do much about room treatment. As this is my third pair of DIY stats I think it would be quite difficult to make big improvements here. (although I have plans to build new panels).
I use a budget CD player (Marantz CD5001) and an old but fine turntable (Pioneer PLD12D with AT100e cartridge) I guess at the source there is room for improvement.
But how about the amplifier? When reading reviews I read a lot of subjective terms describing different amplifiers. At the other side there are people that tell each amplifier should sound (almost) equal as it just aplifies the signal - nothing more.
Then there is the factor of load - electrostats are well know for being a more diffult (capacitive) load compared to magnetic loudspeakers (resistive). And electrostats are well know for being (very) resolving. Would this mean there is room for improvement and would it be worth the effort to upgrade my HK680 amplifier?
Ideally I would select up to five to ten different amplifiers and compare them at home. But I guess this will be difficult - if not imposible. It would be difficult to bring them to an good audio store as well. I always prefer to test things by myself and alone.
So to summarize my question: do you think an amplifier upgrade can result in a clear audible improvement in my case? And what amplifiers would qualify for this? For instance, would a Quad 606 MKII qualify?