PDA

View Full Version : Latest arrival - Miyajima ETR Mono step-up transformer, and musings on the EAR 912



montesquieu
07-07-2018, 17:07
https://i.imgur.com/C4ecK97.jpg

Recently arrived - a Miyajima ETR-Mono step-up transformer. Not the simplest device to use (I'll come to that in a minute). But the biggest question for me was whether I needed it at all, having been so happy with my EAR 912 phono preamp, which replaced some Hashimoto HM-7s (the best SUTs I had owned out of many in a list that included an AN-S6c and a fully implemented TX-103), an Aurorasound Vida (widely regarded as one of the best phono stages out there), and assorted quality preamps including a Modwright 36.5 and a truly cracking Radford Revival prototype.

The EAR 912 is a true Swiss Army knife when it comes to the whole business of vinyl, and moving coil cartridges in particular. Its internal SUT is broadly similar to EAR's stand-along SUT the MC-4, but not quite the same in terms of ratios (and also supposedly made to a higher standard). It provides the following in terms of settings:

x 30 step-up, giving a cartridge loading of 52 ohms into a 47k ohm phono stage (labelled 3 ohms, for low impedance cartridges)
x 24 step-up, cartridge loading 82 ohms @47k (labelled 6 ohms)
x 18 step-up, cartridge loading 145 ohms @47k (labelled 12 ohms)
x 10 step-up, cartridge loading 470 ohms @47k (labelled 40 ohms)

I'm informed by a fellow AoS'er who asked Tim de P at a show 'why these settings?', and he answered that these are the most commonly used values in Japan - 3 ohm for SPU, 6 ohm for Koetsu, 12 ohm for lots of ATs and many other mainstream cartridges, 40 ohm for Denon 103 and other oddball cartridges. Which makes total sense.

The other features on the all-tube (5 x PCC88) EAR 912 complement the SUT options nicely: two tonearm inputs, a toggle switch between MC + MM setting which allows the step-up stage to be bypassed, and perhaps most important of all, an absolutely top moving magnet phono stage that provides RIAA correction on LR (inductance and resistance) principles, as opposed to the more normal CR (capacitance/resistance) type. I had previously thought this was LCR, similar to Aurorasound Vida and several Allnic models, but LR it is indeed when it was introduced back in the early 00s it was the first ever to offer this - based around EAR custom wound inductors, such windings of course being a Tim de P speciality.

The phono section is high gain, especially when the appropriate ratio for a given cartridge is quite a high one, so yet another custom transformer is present in which nicely matches gain between phono and linestage - options are 0db (for no attenuation), -6db and -12db for different levels of gain. This is what the VU meters are for - to ensure things stay nicely in the ideal zone for gain.

The result is a seriously flexible piece of kit, which manages to be more than the sum of its very high-quality parts and does (I think) more than enough to justify its £9,370 list price (not that I paid that for it, thankfully having picked it up second-hand). I've tried it with quite a number of stereo cartridges (well over a dozen) and never found one I couldn't find a setting for that didn't sound ideal. There are potentially a few outliers, though the amount of gain in the system convinces me that it would very probably handle most cartridges at the low impedance/low output end of the scale - including for example the Audio Note Io (1 ohm at the cartridge coils, 0.05mV output) - given how well it recently handled several borrowed Fidelity Research cartridges with 1-2 ohm coils and outputs of 0.1mv, with no lack of gain or impact on the sound from an impedance mismatch. Indeed I believe the only real gap could be said to be at the other end of the output scale, vintage cartridges, mainly mono, with high-ish outputs and oddball coil impedances in the region of 1000-3000, like the 1.5mV Ortofon CD25.

But with modern mono cartridges such as the Miyjima Zero, Premium, Spirit, Kotetu and the rest that I've been playing with for about 8 years now, the EAR SUT section works beautifully and it never occurred to me that what I was getting could be improved in any particular way. The EAR 912 has a mono button, not that you really need it with a mono cartridge, and I've been very happy.

However, audophilia nervosa is never that far away, and a conversation with Hugo of Ammonite Audio, who was enthusing about the ETR-Mono, made me want to investigate - after all, this was a SUT specifically intended for use with Miyajima mono cartridges, of which I own three (though it's flexibility goes way beyond the demands of the Miyajima range).

When it arrived, it took me a little while to fully appreciate how it worked (I'm not going to attempt to go into the detail in this post as Hugo has explained it really well here https://ammonite-audio.co.uk/thoughts-on-the-miyajima-etr-mono-sut/ ) - but essentially, there are a range of input coils which map broadly to the impedance of the cartridge in use, and output coils that map to the gain required. There’s a ton of maths behind the selection, but what I’ve found it that the maths line up with the listening experience. There is a third knob which trims the loading (effectively enabling the overall loading into the phono stage to be altered), I have found this useful too, which (interestingly) isn’t quite what Hugo found.

Anyway I’ve already uncovered the perfect settings for the Miyajima Zero 0.7 (which I used for later mono and for most reissues), Miyajima Premium 1.0 (earlier microgroove mono) and Miyajima Kotetu 78 (for 78s) - all slightly different as their coils and output levels vary. With the Zero in particular I’ve found it has taken performance to an new level - keeping the great horizontal wall of sound that it’s famous for (mono in widevision I call it), but with a shade more detail, more expression, more musicality. With the Premium, which has a part-bamboo tip done by Ana Mighty Sound, it modernises the sound every so slightly and makes it sound more like what I get from Zero .. it seems to clean up the sound in a way that the stereo SUT doesn’t, which is just ideal really - it's always been my view that a lot of old recordings sound old and vintagey simply because we've lost the ability to reproduce them correctly. I have a CD purchased from Pristine Classics that exemplifies this - a masterpiece of work by Andrew Rose, who took some 1929 recordings of Cortot and Thibaud (famous pre-war violin and piano duo) playing Beethoven, and restored it to sound superb - you would simply never fathom this as an 89 year old recording. Likewise there's no reason for 1950s stuff to sound poor - it's just a question of finding ways to get closer to the original recording.

Having said that, compared to the EAR, the Miyajima's changes are subtle, not night and day. There was absolutely nothing ‘wrong’ with the EAR’s mono capability - this just kicks it up a notch. And the precise settings matter a lot - it’s easily possible to make things sound worse. What I’ve found too is that I’m not using it as a tone control - quite simply there are ‘correct’ settings for the cartridges and these don’t really vary from recording to recording. Of course I have my Esoteric Re-equalizer to handle recordings that were created prior to universal adoption of the RIAA equalisation standard. In combination, I really feel I’m getting to the heart of mono reproduction in a way that I wouldn’t have expected even a few years back.

A bonus of course is that this new, all mono Swiss Army knife is not restricted to Miyajimas ... what I want to do now is check out other mono options, perhaps with more advanced stylus profiles than the conical Miyajimas … the Ikeda 9 Mono is very much in my sights (just need to find one s/h or ex-dem as the new price is a wee bit off-putting!). But I'm sure it could equally be used for Lyra, Koetsu and others who have created quality mono cartridges.

The fun continues!

Current mono cartridges: Miyajima Zero 0.7mil, Miyajima Premium/Ana bamboo cantilever 1.0 mil, Miyajima Kotetu/Oto-no Edison Replika 78 4.0 mil, Sonovox MC-4 LP10 1.0mil, Shure M44/7 mono strapped with assorted Expert Stylus tips for 78 2.5-3.5mi
Current stereo cartridges: Miyajima Madake, Miyajima Takumi, Ikeda 9C III, SAEC C-3, Ortofon SPU Royal N,

https://i.imgur.com/eUW4Udr.jpg

Mike Reed
07-07-2018, 20:36
Very interesting write up of the 912, Tom. I appreciate that it was to contrast the Miyajima stage, but good reading for me, as I have almost the cosmetic opposite to you; black fascia/knobs and silver handles (though I wouldn't have chosen that combo). I have been getting light background crackling and a bit of hum on the R/H channel recently, though; on both m/c inputs. Oddly, this same crackling etc. happened over a few months earlier in the year prior to one of my 509s flaming an output valve and needing a fair bit of work, so I put the problem down to the amp. Maybe it was a coincidence.

I agree with your summation of the 912, but it looks like mine will have to go back, despite a full service and new ph/stage valve 20 months ago. B.t.w., d'you know if it's one valve per stage or shared? The combo is excellent with my ESLs., and the 912 surpassed my previous Naim 552 in all departments though synergy may well have played a part. Too bloody hot to do anything at present, though (and it's Wimbledon !).

montesquieu
07-07-2018, 21:41
Very interesting write up of the 912, Tom. I appreciate that it was to contrast the Miyajima stage, but good reading for me, as I have almost the cosmetic opposite to you; black fascia/knobs and silver handles (though I wouldn't have chosen that combo). I have been getting light background crackling and a bit of hum on the R/H channel recently, though; on both m/c inputs. Oddly, this same crackling etc. happened over a few months earlier in the year prior to one of my 509s flaming an output valve and needing a fair bit of work, so I put the problem down to the amp. Maybe it was a coincidence.

I agree with your summation of the 912, but it looks like mine will have to go back, despite a full service and new ph/stage valve 20 months ago. B.t.w., d'you know if it's one valve per stage or shared? The combo is excellent with my ESLs., and the 912 surpassed my previous Naim 552 in all departments though synergy may well have played a part. Too bloody hot to do anything at present, though (and it's Wimbledon !).

As I understand it the five valves are distributed two (one each channel) to the line stage and three (one each channel plus one shared triode) to the phono stage. I've found that the standard TdP-branded valves work best - Ive had Teslas and Telefunkens in there and found no benefit over the standard valves, though it may depend on what comes after as other owners have sworn by both. I have a full set of Telefunkens availalable and had pondered selling them if you think that might be of interest - for me they added detail but reduced body, and I preferred the beefier presentation.

Mine was all silver when I bought it but I had the black handles and knobs swapped in for a bit of contrast when I sent it for service this wasn't an expensive change at all.

Barry
07-07-2018, 21:46
Should one wish to use the Miyajima SUT with stereo MCs, does one simply use two of them?

montesquieu
07-07-2018, 21:57
Should one wish to use the Miyajima SUT with stereo MCs, does one simply use two of them?

Apparently Hugo has tried this to good effect, but a Miyajima ETR-Stereo does exist - this has additional settings to adjust capacitance (four knobs instead of three), but the input and output coil values are different, it appears to me that this is in order to give a wider spread of options with stereo cartridges. While I struggle to believe that the stereo performance of the EAR 912 could be significantly bettered by this step-up (which is not cheap at approaching £3k), I would certainly like to hear it, though I don't know of one available for demo.

Barry
07-07-2018, 22:03
Thanks Tom.

WESTLOWER
07-07-2018, 22:44
This mono journey is Fascinating. Informative & passionate write up Tom. Thanks For sharing

Ammonite Audio
08-07-2018, 05:37
Thanks Tom for the comprehensive write-up on the ETR-MONO SUT. It does work like nothing else with Miyajima mono cartridges; and it's a shame that its minimum gain is still too high for Ortofon SPU Mono CG models, which are the only mono MC cartridges that I've heard that offer a half acceptable alternative to Miyajima.


Apparently Hugo has tried this to good effect, but a Miyajima ETR-Stereo does exist - this has additional settings to adjust capacitance (four knobs instead of three), but the input and output coil values are different, it appears to me that this is in order to give a wider spread of options with stereo cartridges. While I struggle to believe that the stereo performance of the EAR 912 could be significantly bettered by this step-up (which is not cheap at approaching £3k), I would certainly like to hear it, though I don't know of one available for demo.

Yes, out of pure curiosity I did try using two ETR-MONO SUTs for stereo and it worked very nicely indeed, but for stereo duties I do prefer my Paul Hynes Design MC2 active MC head amp (which visitors to the North West Audio Show will have heard). For Miyajima mono, the ETR-MONO SUT is by far preferable over the MC2 - one of those audio synergies that is hard to rationalise in technical terms but which is profoundly obvious from the first notes being played.

While I'm curious about the multi-adjustable Miyajima ETR-STEREO SUT, we will only be offering it here in the UK as a special order item

http://www.miyajima-lab.com/img/ETR-STEREO/etr-stereo01.jpg

anubisgrau
08-07-2018, 11:30
I'm also curious what small tubes TdP uses today. Back in the 90s, he made a huge stock from EI factory in Serbia/Yugoslavia, luckily before the production quality went down the drain. When I had 834p, we compared EAR branded valves with EI from that time and they were clearly the same, both sonically and visually. However a rumor is that he switched to other sources (Chinese?) and it would be good to find out which ones.

Actually I've never had a valve device so insensitive to rolling like EAR's. This is one of my reasons for deep respect for TdP, I have no patience anymore for these types of time wasting :)

montesquieu
10-09-2018, 22:48
Well I couldn't resist .. Miyajima ETR-Stereo SUT, arrived Saturday ready for me to play with on my return from Italy later that day. (Thanks Hugo for shepherding this through to me so quickly after ordering).

http://i.imgur.com/1v6uJNk.jpg (https://imgur.com/1v6uJNk)

Comments to come

And the twins together:

https://i.imgur.com/6fJd3Rf.jpg

WESTLOWER
11-09-2018, 09:09
Well I couldn't resist .. Miyajima ETR-Stereo SUT, arrived Saturday ready for me to play with on my return from Italy later that day. (Thanks Hugo for shepherding this through to me so quickly after ordering).

http://i.imgur.com/1v6uJNk.jpg (https://imgur.com/1v6uJNk)

Comments to come

And the twins together:

https://i.imgur.com/6fJd3Rf.jpg

cooorrrr!
:popcorn:

ovlov854
11-09-2018, 10:43
Thanks Tom for such a fascinating read.....................although I would kill for just the 912 on its own.
Pity in some ways that my Hovland MC is MC only as I think the MM version and a first class SUT would be able to extract far more from my modest Benz

montesquieu
11-09-2018, 21:16
Have done a mini-review of the ETR-Stereo on its own thread https://theartofsound.net/forum/showthread.php?60173-Mini-review-Miyajima-ETR-Stereo-step-up-transformer&p=1011427#post1011427

Mike Adams
11-09-2018, 22:10
Nice review Tom.
Obviously with the wide range of cartridges the versatility of this is really helpful, and I guess this has more options than the settings of the EAR 912?
Whilst the products from Miyajima are certainly good I don't think the KSW was a good match for any of the stereo cartridges, are you finding the versatility of the settings is allowing a more suitable match or do you suppose the Tx are potentially better?
Any thoughts on how it would compare with the HM7s on the equivalent settings?
Re pre amps there are a couple of models though from memory the interesting one didnt have CE certification (from memory)

montesquieu
12-09-2018, 10:14
Nice review Tom.
Obviously with the wide range of cartridges the versatility of this is really helpful, and I guess this has more options than the settings of the EAR 912?
Whilst the products from Miyajima are certainly good I don't think the KSW was a good match for any of the stereo cartridges, are you finding the versatility of the settings is allowing a more suitable match or do you suppose the Tx are potentially better?
Any thoughts on how it would compare with the HM7s on the equivalent settings?
Re pre amps there are a couple of models though from memory the interesting one didnt have CE certification (from memory)

Yes it does have more options than the EAR - the EAR has four:

x 30 step-up, giving a cartridge loading of 52 ohms into a 47k ohm phono stage (labelled 3 ohms, for low impedance cartridges)
x 24 step-up, cartridge loading 82 ohms @47k (labelled 6 ohms)
x 18 step-up, cartridge loading 145 ohms @47k (labelled 12 ohms)
x 10 step-up, cartridge loading 470 ohms @47k (labelled 40 ohms)

This is complemented by the attenuation option, which isn't really a setting, so much as a way of making sure the phono stage doesn't overload given the potential for massive gain.

The ETR-Stereo (and the ETR-Mono, though with different values) by contrast has 4 input options and four output options giving a total of 16 possible combinations, that's before you add the trimming available from adjustable impedance and capacitance.

I think the improvement I'm hearing is a combination of being able to tweak to find the 'perfect' match, and the fact that these dedicated SUTs are very high quality.

As for the Hashimoto question, I'm hoping Adam (who bought my HM7s) will bring his over at some stage for a shootout. :)

The preamp I'm looking at is the EC5 which has three phono inputs, two with trimmable input impedance - yet more options to play with ....

Since your comments were really about the ETR-Stereo I'll copy this into that thread too ...

As an aside BTW there's frequently a lot of nonsense talked online about the EAR 912. First of all that it's the same SUT as the EAR MC4 inside .. it isn't, the gain values are different for a start. Second that barring the adjustability it's the same internally as the much cheaper EAR 868P preamp and 88PB phono stage - this has been propagated by some quite illustrious commentators online, but is also wrong. The 868PL is a tube-FET hybrid along with the inductor in the phono stage (four tubes, two each section) the 912 has five tubes and an all tube + inductor phono stage. The phono sections are different designs.

Mike Reed
12-09-2018, 14:08
That last para. about 912 misconceptions was worth knowing, Tom, as I thought the phono trannies were essentially the same as the MC4 (because I've read the same). What bothers me a little is that you're taking on board a seemingly very sophisticated and versatile stage where one of the great benefits of the 912 is the inclusion of two recognisably excellent ones. Presumably you're using a line in on the 912.

After Superline and all the trimmings plus 552, I really cannot imagine another pre. which would (a) remove so many expensive boxes and cables, and (b) give such an uplift to so many sonic aspects on the three upper m/c cart's I've used with it. Even the 'umble VMS20E I've had knocking about for donkey's years was a revelation, even at 1g in a 14.5 g mass 12" tone-arm !

montesquieu
12-09-2018, 14:56
That last para. about 912 misconceptions was worth knowing, Tom, as I thought the phono trannies were essentially the same as the MC4 (because I've read the same). What bothers me a little is that you're taking on board a seemingly very sophisticated and versatile stage where one of the great benefits of the 912 is the inclusion of two recognisably excellent ones. Presumably you're using a line in on the 912.

After Superline and all the trimmings plus 552, I really cannot imagine another pre. which would (a) remove so many expensive boxes and cables, and (b) give such an uplift to so many sonic aspects on the three upper m/c cart's I've used with it. Even the 'umble VMS20E I've had knocking about for donkey's years was a revelation, even at 1g in a 14.5 g mass 12" tone-arm !

One of the great benefits of the 'all integrated' EAR 912 is just how quiet it is for a valve preamp being fed by step-up transformers... the SUTs are integrated within the chassis in such a way that they are absolutely dead silent. It takes some very good cables and careful placement to approach this with any external SUT including the Miyajimas.

It has indeed come as a surprise to me that it could be bettered upon, when I first got it it was that synergy as a single multi-capable device that sold me on it as much as anything else and I'm quite surprised at myself for heading in the other direction. Yes I am using the MM phono section of the EAR which is pretty special in its own right.

struth
12-09-2018, 15:04
Good write up Tom... much of it over my head and all over my payscale tho.[emoji3]

You have some quality gear mate..

Barry
12-09-2018, 15:45
So will you be keeping the mono SUT for use with your mono cartridges, or will you use one channel of the stereo unit?

montesquieu
12-09-2018, 16:19
So will you be keeping the mono SUT for use with your mono cartridges, or will you use one channel of the stereo unit?

Two arms one for mono one for stereo, two SUTs, two inputs on the EAR.

Barry
12-09-2018, 16:22
Ah, understood. Have you tried the stereo unit with your new Ikeda cartridge, and if you have what are your thoughts? ;)

montesquieu
12-09-2018, 16:23
Ah, understood. Have you tried the stereo unit with your new Ikeda cartridge, and if you have what are your thoughts? ;)

I did include impressions in the other (main ETR-Stereo) thread. It was very good indeed, impressively so.