worrasf
04-01-2014, 15:21
After collecting various bits and pieces over the last 6 months or so I have finally found time to get everything up and running as system 3 in the dining room/conservatory.
Source: Wadia 170i iPod dock with Audiocom signature upgrade and Teddy Pardo PSU
DAC: Bushmaster 1 with Mark Grant linear PSU/sBooster
Amp: NVA AP10P
Speakers: Ruark Epilogue
Cables: NVA sound cords interconnects and NVA LS3 speaker cables - Supra LoRad 2.5 mains lead for the Teddy Pardo
No balanced mains in this room.
I was previously using the Wadia in my main system and to be honest the SQ is as good as my Cyrus CD XT Se2/PSxR.
I've not used the Ruarks for a few years but I remember them as competent performers.
We all know the Bushmaster in MK 1 guise as a terrific DAC and even better with the MG linear PSU (unlke the BM 2 which is much better with external battery)
So the only unknowns were the NVA and (importantly) new listening room. Worth noting it has suspended wood floor with miles of insulation beneath and loads of glass including the roof.
Well it sounds bloody amazing for a low power "entry level" system. The presentation kinda reminds me of my old Naim 32.5/HiCap/140. PRaT are all there to get the feet tapping and the mouth grinning. Either the Ruarks are very sensitive or the NVA very muscular because it goes loud. Position 4 on the volume pot is more than adequate. The majority of the time it's a very competent performer with great mid range detail and dynamics. Voices sound natural. It's only at the extremes that this system trips up. Low bass can be a bit flabby and hihat a tad splashy rather than taught and zingy respectively. It also gets in a little muddle with complex multi-instrument pieces. Stereo imagery is right between the boxes with little or no width to the sound stage. I really do suspect some of this is down to the room which is hardly ideal and that I have grown used to the authority and control especially in the bass of the BM 2.
I must say I am mighty impressed by this little NVA amp and if I was advising someone on a "starter" amp this has to be on the list.
EDIT: My only real criticism is that plugging the headphones in does not cut out the speaker output - you have to manually pull the leads. Now I understand the reason for this regarding SQ -v- cost but nonetheless it's tedious so I've not listened to the headphone output as yet.
Steve
Source: Wadia 170i iPod dock with Audiocom signature upgrade and Teddy Pardo PSU
DAC: Bushmaster 1 with Mark Grant linear PSU/sBooster
Amp: NVA AP10P
Speakers: Ruark Epilogue
Cables: NVA sound cords interconnects and NVA LS3 speaker cables - Supra LoRad 2.5 mains lead for the Teddy Pardo
No balanced mains in this room.
I was previously using the Wadia in my main system and to be honest the SQ is as good as my Cyrus CD XT Se2/PSxR.
I've not used the Ruarks for a few years but I remember them as competent performers.
We all know the Bushmaster in MK 1 guise as a terrific DAC and even better with the MG linear PSU (unlke the BM 2 which is much better with external battery)
So the only unknowns were the NVA and (importantly) new listening room. Worth noting it has suspended wood floor with miles of insulation beneath and loads of glass including the roof.
Well it sounds bloody amazing for a low power "entry level" system. The presentation kinda reminds me of my old Naim 32.5/HiCap/140. PRaT are all there to get the feet tapping and the mouth grinning. Either the Ruarks are very sensitive or the NVA very muscular because it goes loud. Position 4 on the volume pot is more than adequate. The majority of the time it's a very competent performer with great mid range detail and dynamics. Voices sound natural. It's only at the extremes that this system trips up. Low bass can be a bit flabby and hihat a tad splashy rather than taught and zingy respectively. It also gets in a little muddle with complex multi-instrument pieces. Stereo imagery is right between the boxes with little or no width to the sound stage. I really do suspect some of this is down to the room which is hardly ideal and that I have grown used to the authority and control especially in the bass of the BM 2.
I must say I am mighty impressed by this little NVA amp and if I was advising someone on a "starter" amp this has to be on the list.
EDIT: My only real criticism is that plugging the headphones in does not cut out the speaker output - you have to manually pull the leads. Now I understand the reason for this regarding SQ -v- cost but nonetheless it's tedious so I've not listened to the headphone output as yet.
Steve