PDA

View Full Version : Classical music section ...?



jandl100
04-07-2011, 07:31
Quite a few classical fans are coming out of the woodwork in a current music thread ... is there interest in a Classical Music section on AOS? I think one would be good. :)

EDIT: Mind you, it would help if I could spell classical correctly. :doh: - clasical, indeed! :eyebrows:

Marco
04-07-2011, 08:15
Good idea, Jerry. Perhaps, since it's their territory, John and Alex could liaise with each other on this and make it a new project?

I've certainly seen enough interest in classical music in the 'Spinning today' thread alone to warrant the inclusion of a separate classical music section.

Guys, what do you think? :)

Marco.

MartinT
04-07-2011, 08:18
I'm all for it. It's been good to see the Great Classical Recordings thread grow nicely.

http://theartofsound.net/forum/showthread.php?t=11999

keiths
04-07-2011, 10:33
Surely it's all just music - why does it need it's own section?

jandl100
04-07-2011, 10:40
Hi Keith

I knew someone would say that ... it just does, OK? :)

Perhaps another clas(s)ical fan can explain better! :scratch:

keiths
04-07-2011, 10:50
I'm a classical fan, but it's still just music ;)

jandl100
04-07-2011, 10:58
Ah, well, OK. :)

But I still would like a separate classical music section.

But why? Ummm .... I guess I feel a bit uncumfy and embarassed about discussing the nuances of a string quartet performance (say) in public! I want to feel I am sharing opinions with like-minded folk.

I have to confess that I would not be comfortable discussing such things in a 'general music' forum. :mental: ... although the current Great Classical Recordings thread does seem to be going OK. But I would still feel better if it was tucked away somewhere more discreet!

There you go, does that help?

keiths
04-07-2011, 11:07
Surely the discussion of the nuances of the music in public might encourage non-enthusiasts to explore further? Which won't happen if it's 'tucked away' where people won't see it?

It always annoys me when any musical genre is singled out as requiring special treatment - it's all just music!

jandl100
04-07-2011, 11:12
Well, gosh. There's no need to shout. :(

I'm just expressing an opinion. Why not just agree to differ?

EDIT: Ah, OK ... you've calmed down a bit now. :) No need for fisticuffs at dawn, eh? ;)

:cool:

jandl100
04-07-2011, 11:21
It looks like a classical music section could get quite feisty! :lol:

keiths
04-07-2011, 11:28
Sorry Jerry - now realise that came over far more forcefully than I intended (emphasis removed in offending post) and I apologise. I'm not out to pick an argument.

I just feel that the less emphasis placed on genres the better - there are only two sorts of music: good music and bad music (of course I like all the good stuff :lol:) be it 'Classical' (whatever that is), Jazz (likewise) or anything else.

I'd hate to see the Musical Compositions forum here segmented into dozens of ever more specialist and elitist sub-fora.

Lets get the masses listening to music outside their normal choices - and the best way to do that is to discuss it all out in the open.

:grouphug:

jandl100
04-07-2011, 11:31
Damn it - you're being too reasonable now. :rolleyes: How can I take the moral high ground and win the argument by default? :scratch:

... yes, I agree with what you say. :)

But ... I would still like a separate section for classical music. Sorry. :eyebrows:

... why did MartinT think it a good idea?

Thing Fish
04-07-2011, 11:44
Clarinets at dawn...:fence:

keiths
04-07-2011, 11:49
Dawn's a bit early for me. Could we make it around 11:30ish.

MartinT
04-07-2011, 12:07
... why did MartinT think it a good idea?

Sometimes, like you Jerry, I feel that I'm posting about classical records and music to a very small audience, the remainder of whom couldn't care less. Rather than get lost in the mass of modern music (which I also post into), it would be good to have a classical section in which we could enthuse a little more without boring the pants off people.

Don't get me wrong, I completely agree with keiths that good music is good music. I also switch back and forth between modern and classical as my mood takes me.

However, the Great Classical Recordings thread has shown that people do come out from under the floorboards when given a more specific place in which to discuss their passion for classical music. It is this, more than anything, that tells me it's a good idea.

I'd like to hear Barry and BTH K10A's views on it, too.

The Grand Wazoo
04-07-2011, 15:27
I'm mostly vociferously against putting music into genre boxes, but I agree that there's merit in having somewhere discrete for the discussions about classical/orchestral music. Apart from anything else, it's a good way of exposing it to folks who are interested in dipping their toes in the water, if we can point them to one single source of info.

Here's an idea - in addition to the above, how about a collaborative effort to produce an AoS Library piece listing some 'must hear' recordings that go a little beyond the usual Four Seasons/Planets/Messiah type stuff?

MartinT
04-07-2011, 17:45
I'm up for that, as long as it's described a little so that we have an idea of what the piece may be like, otherwise it'll fill up with all our random preferences and lookers-in will still have no idea.

Beechwoods
04-07-2011, 17:54
I'm sure YouTube covers classical as well, so while not conveying the scale and majesty of an orchestra at full tilt, it might hint at what you're on about :) ;)

Barry
04-07-2011, 19:05
Sometimes, like you Jerry, I feel that I'm posting about classical records and music to a very small audience, the remainder of whom couldn't care less. Rather than get lost in the mass of modern music (which I also post into), it would be good to have a classical section in which we could enthuse a little more without boring the pants off people.

Don't get me wrong, I completely agree with keiths that good music is good music. I also switch back and forth between modern and classical as my mood takes me.

However, the Great Classical Recordings thread has shown that people do come out from under the floorboards when given a more specific place in which to discuss their passion for classical music. It is this, more than anything, that tells me it's a good idea.

I'd like to hear Barry and BTH K10A's views on it, too.

Hi Jerry,

Just spotted this thread and have to confess that I do intend to contribute to the Great Classical Recordings thread, but haven't had the time so far.

In principle, I'm with Chris (TGW) in the sense that it's the thin edge of the wedge - why not a separate section for any other musical genre: R 'n' B; Folk; Jazz; "World" (a stupid enough classification - all music is world music) etc.?

But - Classical music is a little different. The recordings are not made by the original composer/performer (well, with the exception of a few by Elgar, Stravinski and Gershwin. There may be some others.). In all cases the recordings are intepretations of the scores left by the composers. That is why many of us will have several versions of one particular piece. I'm still looking for my definitive version of the Beethoven 9!
It is also the reason why, when posting on the "Spinning Today" thread I go to the trouble of listing soloists, orchestras, conductors and give the recording date and number.

There is of course a danger that such a dedicated section, wherein details of interpretation are chewed (maybe even argued) over, would put off those noviciates who want to dip their toe into the Classical waters. It need not, but there is that risk.

We do seem to be in the minority and whilst "Spinning Today" is the first thread I visit when logged on, I rarely read of members spinning classical music.

So why don't we give it a go and see how it progresses? If after say, six months, it has been seen that apart from the 'usual suspects', there are few posts from others - or there is poor feedback/criticism from non-classicists, then the section is folded up and all those posts (retrospectively) transferred into the main "Spinning Today" thread.

Regards

Tim
04-07-2011, 19:48
I really like the idea and agree with Martin and Barry. We are a small minority, but I enjoy reading about the classical music people are spinning. I tend to go through phases and at times play nothing but classical for a few days, but rarely post them in the spinning thread, because of the reasons outlined already. I have bought a few discs after reading recommendations from M & B, so I certainly appreciate the additions to "Spinning Today".

I'm playing a little less than normal lately, as I have just sold my CDP and have yet to rip my entire classical collection, so it's a handicap at the moment, but soon to be remedied. A classical section may give me the kick up the butt I need to sort it out - it was quite a palaver playing the Elgar recently, compared to my normal few mouse clicks for everything else :(

Alex_UK
04-07-2011, 22:06
I guess classical will always divide opinions - there's a lot of people I guess who see it as elitist and inaccessible? Probably not "hifi bods" though? I certainly don't see a problem with a "Classical Corner" but I don't think I would advocate a separate "Spinning Today" thread just for classical - I would still personally like to see that thread a mish-mash of all genres, as part of the appeal would be lost without it. As always, though - the people should get what the people want, so let us know what you think folks.

jandl100
04-07-2011, 22:08
There is of course a danger that such a dedicated section, wherein details of interpretation are chewed (maybe even argued) over, would put off those noviciates who want to dip their toe into the Classical waters. It need not, but there is that risk.

I'm sure there will be a mixture of accessible threads and in-depth hair-splitting of interest only to the classically insane! :mental:

Certainly going by the Wigwam classical music section, there were a number of threads started by classical would-be newbies who were after advice on what to get to dip their toes in the water. And those threads almost always went down well, and led to all sorts of interesting advice & discussions.

I'm sure it will be a useful mixture. :)

So ... when's it gonna start? :popcorn:

The Grand Wazoo
04-07-2011, 22:17
There are two excellent threads that were started by Jeremy Marchant that kind of set the scene nicely:


Songs with orchestra worth exploring
http://theartofsound.net/forum/showthread.php?t=3359



This was a great sampler for classical music & Jeremy explained a good way of easing yourself into things while also providing some background information.

Classical music for people that (think they) don't like classical music
http://theartofsound.net/forum/showthread.php?t=3373

Jeremy has credentials in this field!

WOStantonCS100
04-07-2011, 22:19
But - Classical music is a little different. The recordings are not made by the original composer/performer (well, with the exception of a few by Elgar, Stravinski and Gershwin. There may be some others.). In all cases the recordings are intepretations of the scores left by the composers. That is why many of us will have several versions of one particular piece. I'm still looking for my definitive version of the Beethoven 9!
It is also the reason why, when posting on the "Spinning Today" thread I go to the trouble of listing soloists, orchestras, conductors and give the recording date and number.

There is of course a danger that such a dedicated section, wherein details of interpretation are chewed (maybe even argued) over, would put off those noviciates who want to dip their toe into the Classical waters. It need not, but there is that risk.

I tend to agree. In terms of identifying classical recordings, there are layers that are sometimes hard for those new to the "genre" to figure out. It can be a little daunting to choose, as you say, Beethoven's 9th, when there are so many different recordings of it out there. Composer, conductor, symphony/philharmonic, soloist... symphonic, operatic, ballet, chamber... :doh: I think a dedicated area like this could not only point out good recordings but could also help steer newcomers, more quickly, to recordings they will enjoy... as opposed to gettin suckered into some of those dreadful compilations.

Maybe, such an area needs to moderated in a more heavy handed way than usual. For example, pointing out the differences between performances by Vladimir Ashkenazy and Glenn Gould = allowed. Say Ashkenazy or Gould play with broken fingers compared to the other = permission to post in section terminated. ;)

keiths
05-07-2011, 00:21
I guess classical will always divide opinions - there's a lot of people I guess who see it as elitist and inaccessible?

It's only 'elitist and inaccessible' when people make it that way. Anyway, I'm done on this topic, hope any segregated 'classical' forum is a big success. Sincerely.

BTH K10A
05-07-2011, 06:04
The reason I started the thread "Great Classical Recordings" was to showcase classical music that I and others have found that merit recommendation. It may be that the recording was exemplary, the musicianship was superb or any other reason.

As Barry said, classical music is a little different in that it's the orchestra or musician(s), conductor and recording engineer who together can often create something special. Taking the example of Beethoven's 9th, I've had a quick check and found I own 15 different versions, spanning a period 60 years between recording dates. Each has something to offer but there are some I consider to be truly excellent and worthy of recommendation. Others may have version I've not heard or prefer a different rendition. In this way we can all share our findings and learn from each other.

If there is sufficient interest in such a thread then, with members recommendations, we can start to build up a knowledge base that may help others to make informed choices when considering classical music.

Just to head this one off at the pass, I know some of the recordings I have posted may not always be that affordable as an original pressing but with very few exceptions have been re-issued in various formats and are freely available.

So, should there be a seperate section for classical? I don't really think so but what I wanted to acheive is not "spinning today" but more akin to a classical version of "records to die for" so maybe making it a sticky would be the right thing to start with.

Andy

worthingpagan
05-07-2011, 10:14
Well I listen to a bit of Classical from time to time :stalks: I think a section of the forum specifically for this genre would be a great idea. I particularly like Elgar, Bach, & Mahler.

Dr Bunsen Honeydew
05-07-2011, 12:45
Quite a few classical fans are coming out of the woodwork in a current music thread ... is there interest in a Classical Music section on AOS? I think one would be good. :)

EDIT: Mind you, it would help if I could spell classical correctly. :doh: - clasical, indeed! :eyebrows:

If you really want it to include just classical music by definition then it would be a rather limited catalogue. No modern composers, no Bach or Mozart :eyebrows:

Effem
05-07-2011, 12:53
So ... when's it gonna start? :popcorn:

When you promise by all that's sacred you won't fill it with dirge :eek:

MartinT
05-07-2011, 12:55
If you really want it to include just classical music by definition then it would be a rather limited catalogue. No modern composers, no Bach or Mozart :eyebrows:

Not using it in that sense :)

Dr Bunsen Honeydew
05-07-2011, 13:03
Not using it in that sense :)
That is the definition.

Yoga
05-07-2011, 13:11
There are two excellent threads that were started by Jeremy Marchant that kind of set the scene nicely:


Songs with orchestra worth exploring
http://theartofsound.net/forum/showthread.php?t=3359



This was a great sampler for classical music & Jeremy explained a good way of easing yourself into things while also providing some background information.

Classical music for people that (think they) don't like classical music
http://theartofsound.net/forum/showthread.php?t=3373

Jeremy has credentials in this field!

Ooh, very handy. Thanks :)

jandl100
05-07-2011, 13:45
Frank, I can't promise there will be no dirges - in fact, I rather suspect there will be quite a few! :eyebrows: ... but Richard, it would be nice if we could make it a PFZ*.

* Pedant-Free Zone :lol:

Barry
05-07-2011, 17:45
Goodness! This thread is about to be strangled at birth! We haven't even started and we're already arguing over definition. I'm happy to go with what Wiki says is "classical": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_music.

But, I will concede that may eliminate modern composers who write in the style of past classical composers. I'm thinking here of Michael Niman, Phillip Glass, Georgy Ligeti, John Adams, Roy Harris and of performers such as The Kronos Quartet, who only perform compositions written post 1900. (Come to think of it, most of the recordings on the ECM label.)

Enough of this nit-picking - here is my suggestion posited in the tradition of The Great British Compromise:

We continue to mention our classical 'spins' on the "Spinning Today" thread as well as on the "Great Classical Recordings" thread. When posted on the latter thread, a sentence or two is addded as to why the poster likes that particular recording, or not, as the case may be. That way others can suggest recordings which might be better etc. and open up the discussion/debate (but hopefully, not an argument).

I think this will keep everyone happy. What are your thoughts?

jandl100
05-07-2011, 18:10
Enough of this nit-picking - here is my suggestion posited in the tradition of The Great British Compromise:

We continue to mention our classical 'spins' on the "Spinning Today" thread as well as on the "Great Classical Recordings" thread. When posted on the latter thread, a sentence or two is addded as to why the poster likes that particular recording, or not, as the case may be. That way others can suggest recordings which might be better etc. and open up the discussion/debate (but hopefully, not an argument).

I think this will keep everyone happy. What are your thoughts?

That's not a compromise, that's a cop out! ;)

I'm still hoping for a separate classical music section. :) There's lots more to be discussed than can easily be managed under the terms of your suggestion.

The Grand Wazoo
05-07-2011, 18:19
I think we all know what is being discussed and I'm sure we would agree that Classical music is generally an inadequate term, but - do we really have to call it the "What is Popularly, But Incorrectly, Known as Classical Music Section"?!?

Barry
05-07-2011, 18:36
That's not a compromise, that's a cop out! ;)

I'm still hoping for a separate classical music section. :) There's lots more to be discussed than can easily be managed under the terms of your suggestion.

How so? I have suggested that a post within your separate "classical music section" be accompanied with additional information so as to promote discussion.

MartinT
05-07-2011, 19:00
But, I will concede that may eliminate modern composers who write in the style of past classical composers. I'm thinking here of Michael Niman, Phillip Glass, Georgy Ligeti, John Adams, Roy Harris and of performers such as The Kronos Quartet, who only perform compositions written post 1900. (Come to think of it, most of the recordings on the ECM label.)

It had better not! Classical is a generic style, whether it be orchestral, instrumental or vocal. To me, Glass and Ligeti are just as eligible as Beethoven. And even though the strict definition is the period between baroque and romantic, I prefer the broader one you quote from Wikipedia.

I think, on balance, I would like a separate 'classical' place for many of the reasons given. However, I will go with the flow.

Beechwoods
05-07-2011, 19:31
So are we asking for a sub-forum (as was set up to organise the AV Studio (http://theartofsound.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=38)) or a few sticky threads in the current Musical Compositions area? I assume the former.

Let's not get caught up worrying about definitions. If I come along and post in the 'Classical Section' my love for Reich's 'Music For 18 Musicians' don't diss me for getting my genre's mixed up! Turn me on to some old stuff that more closely fits the definition, with some progressive Classical to tickle my ear-buds!

WOStantonCS100
05-07-2011, 19:32
I think, on balance, I would like a separate 'classical' place for many of the reasons given. However, I will go with the flow.

+1

...anything so as not to be sucked into another argument... :)

Barry
05-07-2011, 19:53
So are we asking for a sub-forum (as was set up to organise the AV Studio (http://theartofsound.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=38)) or a few sticky threads in the current Musical Compositions area? I assume the former.

Let's not get caught up worrying about definitions. If I come along and post in the 'Classical Section' my love for Reich's 'Music For 18 Musicians' don't diss me for getting my genre's mixed up! Turn me on to some old stuff that more closely fits the definition, with some progressive Classical to tickle my ear-buds!

Hi Nick,

That is exactly what Jerry has in mind. I'm not sure if you posted in the "Spinning Today" thread regarding the Reich (a composer with whom I have difficulty) you would either be 'diss'd' or receive suggestions of similar music.

I think we are looking for a 'sub-area' (corner?) within the "Music Compositions" room.

Personally I think it should be linked somehow to the "Spinning Today" thread - if that is possible.

Regards

MartinT
05-07-2011, 19:54
So are we asking for a sub-forum (as was set up to organise the AV Studio (http://theartofsound.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=38)) or a few sticky threads in the current Musical Compositions area? I assume the former.

How about the former as an experiment? It'll be up to us to make a success of it. If it dries up, we'll quietly merge the threads back in to the mainstream area.


Let's not get caught up worrying about definitions. If I come along and post in the 'Classical Section' my love for Reich's 'Music For 18 Musicians' don't diss me for getting my genre's mixed up!

As if ;)

Beechwoods
05-07-2011, 19:58
Ok, soonest said as done :)

MartinT
05-07-2011, 20:01
Shall we move the Greatest Classical Recordings thread in to make a good start?

Beechwoods
05-07-2011, 20:06
I'm trying to think of a good name for it!

MartinT
05-07-2011, 20:11
Classical Creations?

Barry
05-07-2011, 20:13
Classical Creations?

Ugh! Too ambigious. :(

Beechwoods
05-07-2011, 20:15
'The Classical Section' - at least it will do for now!

http://theartofsound.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=44

MartinT
05-07-2011, 20:15
Over to you, then :)

It should include Classical as that is the only definition of such a wide range of music that works.

MartinT
05-07-2011, 20:16
Cheers, Nick! Will you move the thread, or shall I?

Beechwoods
05-07-2011, 20:18
Already done. Fill yer boots ;)

The Grand Wazoo
05-07-2011, 20:18
I'd suggest we maybe stick Jeremy's two threads in there too?

Beechwoods
05-07-2011, 20:19
Go for it, if you can't I can. Just let me have the links...

The Grand Wazoo
05-07-2011, 20:20
Will do...........

jandl100
05-07-2011, 20:57
:yay:

Alex_UK
05-07-2011, 21:26
The only "problem" I have with separate section is that as a music room mod I know bugger all about classical music - well, at least since I gave up the violin at age 13! I can't vouch for John, but assuming he is no expert either, do you think we need a specific "Classical Music Mod", and if so, would anyone like to volunteer? (Subject to "der management" approval, of course.) Not that I'm expecting you to all start whacking each other with your oboes or bassoons, you understand! ;)

MartinT
05-07-2011, 21:29
I don't mind doing it but I doubt it needs another mod. Good lord, it's the music of gents, what?

Alex_UK
05-07-2011, 21:31
I don't mind doing it but I doubt it needs another mod. Good lord, it's the music of gents, what?

I was hoping you'd say that! :lol: We love a volunteer! ;)

Tim
05-07-2011, 21:36
Goodness me, if we need a Mod to stop handbag fights in here, then I just don't know . . .
http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w63/greatgig/catfight.gif

BTH K10A
05-07-2011, 21:49
The only "problem" I have with separate section is that as a music room mod I know bugger all about classical music - well, at least since I gave up the violin at age 13! I can't vouch for John, but assuming he is no expert either, do you think we need a specific "Classical Music Mod", and if so, would anyone like to volunteer? (Subject to "der management" approval, of course.) Not that I'm expecting you to all start whacking each other with your oboes or bassoons, you understand! ;)

You could be the apprentice Alex. ;)

Just because it's classical music doesn't change the face of unacceptable behaviour / posts. Just watch out for phrases like "Steady on old boy", "you absolute rotter" and "you cad sir" and you'll know when it's getting rowdy. :lolsign:

Andy

Alex_UK
05-07-2011, 21:50
Goodness me, if we need a Mod to stop handbag fights in here, then I just don't know . . .
http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w63/greatgig/catfight.gif

I'm pretty sure there will be pistols at dawn just deciding on the definition of "Classical"! But hopefully you'll happily dispatch each other without resorting to calling anyone a clarinet

Alex_UK
05-07-2011, 21:52
You could be the apprentice Alex. ;)

Just because it's classical music doesn't change the face of unacceptable behaviour / posts. Just watch out for phrases like "Steady on old boy", "you absolute rotter" and "you cad sir" and you'll know when it's getting rowdy. :lolsign:

Andy

:lolsign:

"fisticuffs" is also on my radar!

Now - enjoy everyone! :)

MartinT
05-07-2011, 22:10
:lol:

The Grand Wazoo
05-07-2011, 22:40
I was waiting for what I thought would be the inevitable 'no baton waiving' gag........ah well, probably best not to, eh?

Stratmangler
05-07-2011, 23:19
I'm just finding it hugely amusing looking at the "Clasical music section ...?" :eyebrows:
Smelling pistakes lure, ko ?

MartinT
06-07-2011, 05:50
Smelling pistakes lure, ko ?

"It's English, Jim, but not as we know it"

Beechwoods
06-07-2011, 06:43
Martin, between you, John, Chris, me, and the rest of the team I think we can handle gauntlets being thrown in the Classical room just fine!

jandl100
23-07-2011, 07:55
..... I certainly don't see a problem with a "Classical Corner" but I don't think I would advocate a separate "Spinning Today" thread just for classical - I would still personally like to see that thread a mish-mash of all genres, as part of the appeal would be lost without it. As always, though - the people should get what the people want, so let us know what you think folks.

Hmmm ... well, as a blinkered chappie (yes, I admit it) who listens mainly (95%++) to classical, there ain't a lot going down on "Spinning Today" that's of interest to me.
I've just trawled thru over a dozen pages of that thread and there hasn't been a single mention of a classical piece actually being played (a few posts about the Proms coming along soon). Or maybe I just hit a classical-free stretch of that thread?

So ... I'd like to start a "Classical Spinning Today" thread in the Classical Moozik section, and hopefully a bit of chat will develop.
It may well be that very little classical gets played by AOS denizens. So if it flops, it flops.

Any thoughts?
Any objections?
Any interest?
:)

EDIT: See next post!!

jandl100
23-07-2011, 08:06
.... Or maybe I just hit a classical-free stretch of that thread? ...


Ha Ha!! Yes, I've now gone thru a few more pages of Spinning Today and found quite a few classical references! :doh::lol:

Anyway - waddya think of my original idea? Should we separate out classical spins?

Personally, I'd rather not have to trawl thru 2 dozen pages of jazzy plinky plonk crap* (no offence :eyebrows:) in order to get to some interesting bits. ;)

___

* yes, it's OK , I know there's a lot more than that! :)

The Grand Wazoo
23-07-2011, 08:31
If you do it Jerry, will you promise to spell Clasticle proper in the thread title?

Alex_UK
23-07-2011, 09:09
Why not give it a try - my only concern as eluded to before is that we lose the diversity of the main thread, but I'm sure people will still post there too. If you'd like the honour of starting it Jerry, one of us can make it a "sticky" in the clasticle room. :)

Stratmangler
23-07-2011, 09:18
So if it flops, it flops

I seems to have flopped already - it's 16 days from the last post in this thread until the flurry of activity today.....

jandl100
23-07-2011, 09:49
I'll wait for a few more views to be posted - I don't want to create an AOS Apartheid-type rift if it's not welcome. :)


I seems to have flopped already - it's 16 days from the last post in this thread until the flurry of activity today.....

And, umm, you seem to have missed quite a few threads and posts in the new clasticle subsection of the music bit, Stratty! There has been a fair bit of activity. ;)
http://theartofsound.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=44
But no, it's not been that lively, so maybe there's not a huge amount of interest in clasticle music here.

Beechwoods
23-07-2011, 11:21
I wouldn't expect this particular thread to be that lively cos it's served it's purpose. The new Classical Section is now live so peeps should be busy over there!

Marco
23-07-2011, 11:59
Indeed :)

Marco.

jazzpiano
15-10-2011, 22:17
Hello,

Just want to put my 2 cents in: I like the idea of a classical music discussion group w/in the concept of a larger group. That way I wouldn't have to filter through the musical stuff I'm not interested in to get to what I am interested in. When I'm in the mood to get into a classical music discusiion (or jazz, nostalgic rock, etc.) I'd like to be able to do so effeiciently. And, when I want a general, all types of music discussion I'd like to be able to do that as well. Here are example questions I might have:
For Classical: I am looking for members' highest recommendations for performances of 20th century British classical music available on CD or inexpensive LP (Argo, London Treasury, etc.) In this question, I am looking for the experienced, passionate classical listener's response. For General Music: What is the breadth of your music collection and what would be 3 dessert island picks for you in each category or type of music?
To me it's not so much that a genre is being put in a box, it is that I can jump between boxes depending on where I want to go and whether I want to get micro or macro. Of course, great music is great music - whatever type. But part of the answer is about navigation and being able to go deep when you want to. One just makes it easier to go where I want.

Best,
Barry

Marco
15-10-2011, 22:27
Hi Barry,

The Classical Section is now alive and kicking, so check it out: http://theartofsound.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=44

:)

Marco.

Barry
11-11-2011, 21:09
Hi Barry,

The Classical Section is now alive and kicking, so check it out: http://theartofsound.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=44

:)

Marco.

Why is this thread titled "Clasical music section ...?" (sic)? Standards, standards! :eyebrows:

Marco
11-11-2011, 22:46
Blame OP's typo - now fixed! ;)

Marco.

jandl100
11-11-2011, 22:47
Why is this thread titled "Clasical music section ...?" (sic)? Standards, standards! :eyebrows:

A slip of my keyboard finger - and the bloody mods must have thought it was funny to leave it like that. :rolleyes:

:)

jandl100
11-11-2011, 22:49
Ah - my apologies ! :lolsign:

Marco
12-11-2011, 00:07
Indeed - you must stop wearing those woollen mittens (with your adult Babygro and booties) when you're typing! :eyebrows:

;)

Marco.