The thing that really makes me laugh is that Brian has been singled out for copying the config of the SSC, but using a different core cable. Brian arrived at the current config as a joint effort.
I had tried the hot/cold conductors only as a quick and dirty test to see if the cable was worth pursuing. I couldn't be bothered messing with the screen at that point. It sounded pretty good to me. Brian asked how I had wired them up, and did the same. The results speak for themselves. So as Monty Python said "(He's not the Messiah.) He's a very naughty boy!" (I'll leave the rest out, but look it up if you want, it kind of feels appropriate).
As a SSC is a shot gunned military grade coaxial comms cable, and the MC5000 is a balanced microphone cable, how is the config the same?
The MC5000 double copper braided screen is not used. The plugs are different. The cables are different, so obviously the config is the same.
I'm not a believer that different plugs in my system make a big difference. I have used the same plugs on the cheaper NVA interconnects, and I can't detect a big difference. I believe that these are brass.
The MS Audio plugs are cheap, easy to solder and work well. Why bother looking elsewhere? You could spend more money on the plugs, but it won't give you a significant improvement.
I have now soldered mine up single ended and didn't notice a big difference. OldPinkMan was here the other day and thought that I had a nicely balanced system (apart from when the QED SA went in - you can read more about that on TAS) so they must be working well, and that is to say that they neither add anything, or take anything away (A cable cannot add anything, other than interference throughout the length of the cable).