+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 81 to 89 of 89

Thread: CD transports - do they matter?

  1. #81
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Wrexham, North Wales, UK

    Posts: 110,012
    I'm AudioAl'sArbiterForPISHANTO.

    Default

    Personally I prefer 32 and 64 bit depth recordings (those these are very rare and we do have equipment that can reproduce this), purely down to the amount of information available that can 'paint the picture properly' when you hear these compared to red book it does make you realise how far red book is off the pace.Interesting thread too.
    Hi Tony,

    You may be right, but we'll see what happens when I hear the Bel Canto DAC Steve will be auditioning, against my Sony!

    The CDPs built-in one was nothing to write home about...

    All will be reported (as usual) on the forum

    Marco.
    Main System

    Turntable: Heavily-modified Technics SL-1210MK5G [Mike New bearing/ETP platter/Paul Hynes SR7 PSU & reg mods]. Funk Firm APM Achromat/Nagaoka GL-601 Crystal Record Weight/Isonoe feet & boots/Ortofon RS-212D/Denon DL-103GL in Denon PCL-300 headshell with Funk Firm Houdini/Kondo SL-115 pure-silver cartridge leads.

    Paul Hynes MC head amp/SR5 PSU. Also modded Lentek head amp/Denon AU-310 SUT.

    Other Cartridges: Nippon Columbia (NOS 1987) Denon DL-103. USA-made Shure SC35C with NOS stylus. Goldring G820 with NOS stylus. Shure M55E with NOS stylus.

    CD Player: Audiocom-modified Sony X-777ES/DAS-R1 DAC.

    Tape Deck: Tandberg TCD 310, fully restored and recalibrated as new, by RDE, plus upgraded with heads from the TCD-420a. Also with matching TM4 Norway microphones.

    Preamps: Heavily-modified Croft Charisma-X. LDR Stereo Coffee. Power Amps: Tube Distinctions Copper Amp fitted with Tungsol KT-150s. Quad 306.

    Cables & Sundries: Mark Grant HDX1 interconnects and digital coaxial cable, plus Mark Grant 6mm UP-LCOFC Van Damme speaker cable. MCRU 'Ultimate' mains leads. Lehmann clone headphone amp with vintage Koss PRO-4AAA headphones.

    Tube Distinctions digital noise filter. VPI HW16.5 record cleaning machine.

    Speakers: Tannoy 15MGs in Lockwood cabinets with modified crossovers. 1967 Celestion Ditton 15.


    Protect your HUMAN RIGHTS and REFUSE ANY *MANDATORY* VACCINE FOR COVID-19!

    Also **SAY NO** to unjust 'vaccine passports' or certificates, which are totally incompatible with a FREE society!!!


  2. #82
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: http://www.homehifi.co.uk

    Posts: 6,288

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lurcher View Post
    Yep, one of the games I can play with the CPLD in my dac is truncate the word length, I suspect the folks who crave for 24 bit reproduction might be a bit upset how 15 and 14 bit sounds,

    Are you sure about the 12 bit? I know the early Phlips (Sony and Meridian) machines used 4 times oversampling with cunning noise shaping and 14 bit DACs
    Unfortunately for me, I was the guy selected by the repair company I worked for in the 80's (remember Lasky's?) to go on the various training courses and come back to train up the other staff. Sticks in my head as a sore thumb. The 12 bit players I remember are the Hitachi and the Fisher, which had the CD eject mechanism that pushed the CD upwards.

    The 1st noted 14 bit player was the 14 bit, 4X oversampling Marantz.

  3. #83
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Halifax, UK

    Posts: 1,399
    I'm Nick.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sensimilia View Post
    Unfortunately for me, I was the guy selected by the repair company I worked for in the 80's (remember Lasky's?) to go on the various training courses and come back to train up the other staff. Sticks in my head as a sore thumb. The 12 bit players I remember are the Hitachi and the Fisher, which had the CD eject mechanism that pushed the CD upwards.

    The 1st noted 14 bit player was the 14 bit, 4X oversampling Marantz.
    Ok, the one I was thinking of and have seen was based on the CD104

  4. #84
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: http://www.homehifi.co.uk

    Posts: 6,288

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lurcher View Post
    Ok, the one I was thinking of and have seen was based on the CD104
    That came years later. Before that you had the CD100, CD101, and the CD303. I still got two CD104 laser unit. One is BINB. Might dump it on fleebay.

  5. #85
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Halifax, UK

    Posts: 1,399
    I'm Nick.

    Default

    I still got two CD104 laser unit. One is BINB. Might dump it on fleebay.
    I might know someone who would be interested in that. I can ask him if you like?

  6. #86
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: http://www.homehifi.co.uk

    Posts: 6,288

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lurcher View Post
    I might know someone who would be interested in that. I can ask him if you like?
    Sure, why not? I might even have the CDM-2 service manual as well.

  7. #87
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Halifax, UK

    Posts: 1,399
    I'm Nick.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sensimilia View Post
    Sure, why not? I might even have the CDM-2 service manual as well.
    Ok, I will pass the info on.

  8. #88
    Join Date: Jun 2009

    Location: S-ex

    Posts: 523
    I'm Steve.

    Default Save my sanity!

    Having read this thread I decided to try a quick experiment. I'm involved in the print industry and my company makes inks for printing CDs, so we get involved with the technicalities of producing inks that don't effect the spin of discs. A (musician but non-hifi) colleague argued the case for the superior ability of Blue Ray laser to read red book Cds. In theory this technology development needs to be highly accurate to read the smaller HD 'braille'. In theory the Blue Ray laser should read the disc extremely well. Sounded like heresy but...

    I connected a PS3 and sat back expecting the worst. I was not disappointed. While quite dynamic, there was little soundstage or natural tone for a start. No bass, no finesse. The DAC would be voiced for games and films for one and with the R&D and hardware budget for the laser assembly I would imagine that nothing else in there is HiFi quality i.e. master clock.

    I bought a cheap optical cable for a test, rigged up my MF TriVista DAC21 - and I can't turn it off!

    My transport is usually a Consonance Linear 120, times like it has no right to but obviously does have it's shortcomings like any £800 player, so maybe I'm merely hearing the PS3 as a transport highlighting these faults and doing them better, while I'm missing the weaknesses. But it's sounding really dynamic, detailed, holographic with excellent instrument seperation and it's so musical it's just grooving like a bastard!

    I feel guilty!! Can anyone bring me back down to earth with a counter experience or if you have the wherewithall, put a PS3 through your DAC for a second opinion. Maybe it just feeds the DAC21 what it needs and it's a synergy thing but I haven't even tweaked yet!!??
    Steve & Valerie

    www.electricbeachaudio.com

    If you think you know the answer already, you're not really searching

    A plastic box, some glass bottles, two metal tins and some lengths of string

  9. #89
    Join Date: Nov 2008

    Location: Valley of the Hazels

    Posts: 9,139
    I'm AMusicFanNotAnAudiophile.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by electric beach View Post
    I bought a cheap optical cable for a test, rigged up my MF TriVista DAC21 - and I can't turn it off!
    Just forget all the guilt, hype and bullsh*t and enjoy.

    Chris

+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •