Dimitri.
In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
Location: gone
Posts: 11,519
I'm gone.
I think that rapid ABABAB comparisons can be misleading and can substantially underplay differences.
I was comparing the DAC section of my Arcam DV29 player with my Theta DAC last night - each plugged into a different input on my amp so a single press of a remote control button swapped between the two.
Rapid A/B comparisons usually resulted in a "it sounds the same" result .... but leaving each one playing for just a minute or so and then swapping back and the superiority of the Theta DAC became pretty damn obvious! (Darn - I was hoping to be able to sell the Theta! ).
.
Location: Suffolk, UK
Posts: 1,473
I'm Paul.
It definitely a case of sum over averages when comparing hifi. I find that I have to listen to something for days to get a good idea of how it compares. During this time I have to swap for long periods. There has only been a few times when a change has been obvious and oddly mostly never on my own system!
~Paul~
Location: Nergenshuizen, NL
Posts: 197
I'm NoLongerActive.
One day I run into a post made by a guy working for Fraunhofer.
If he compares codecs for transparency, he uses samples of 2-3 sec max.
Otherwise you auditory memory will fail you!
Perception