+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 61 to 67 of 67

Thread: Cheapest speaker options for BIG sound

  1. #61
    Join Date: Apr 2012

    Location: Southall, West London

    Posts: 33,566
    I'm Geoff.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TazSob View Post
    Was reading something about the evolution of the KEF company a while back and there was something about the engineers trying to get more air movement from smaller drivers with bigger magnets, more coil and better materials which they did successfully.
    I think somebody may have been generalising or oversimplifying there.

    Makers have used magnets of varying powers for varying purposes since moving coils speakers evolved.

    Talking of KEF, look at the B200 bass/mid driver from the seventies. The smaller sealed cabinet speaker models (Chorale/Corelli) employing the B200 used versions with small magnets and relied on the 'airspring' effect to return the cone to its starting position. A bigger magnet would have overdamped the system reducing bass.

    However, in the larger B200 equipped speakers (Cadenza/Calinda), the B200 had a large, heavy magnet. This was to provide a better damping of the larger volume system and proper control over the ABR's. A small magnet would have given too loose and slow a bass response.

  2. #62
    Join Date: Jul 2012

    Location: Benson, Oxfordshire

    Posts: 476
    I'm Alex.

    Default

    I'm extremely happy with my speakers, or, I was until I read this thread. It's now making me wonder what I'm missing out on.

    Now, are these big Tannoys any good at more modest volumes (I don't live in a detached house) or is that defeating the purpose?

  3. #63
    Join Date: Feb 2010

    Location: Berkshire, UK

    Posts: 2,816
    I'm Tom.

    Default

    You aren’t far away from me Alan ... you are welcome to drop in and hear what properly sorted Tannoys can do. And yes they still do room filling scale at modest volumes. As has been suggested, something to do with driver area I suspect. That’s with (currently) 35w of Radford STA25.
    Main: Speakers 'RFC' Tannoy Canterburys / custom crossovers; Amp - Radford STA100; Pre EAR 912; Vinyl: Thorens TD124 MkII + Ikeda IT345-CR1 / Ortofon 309 Limited tonearms; Cartridges Stereo - Miyajima Madake, Ortofon SPU Royal N + Shure M3D Jico stylus; Mono - Miyajimas - Zero 0.7, Premium 1.0 retipped by Ana Mighty Sound bamboo cantilever, Spirit '78' 3.0 conical from Ana, also vintage GE VRII, Shure M44 strapped for mono with several Expert Stylus conicals for different eras of 78s; Phono stage and SUT from EAR 912; Esoteric Sound Re-Equalizer for equalisation of early mono and 78, switchable in from tape loop; Digital: Audio Note CDT2/II transport, heavily modded AN Kit DAC + Mutec MC3+USB.

    Study: Speakers - Tannoy DC6; Amp: Duncan 'Tuberhunter' 200w class D; preamp - Pass DCB1; Vinyl: Garrard 401 with AT1503 tonearm and vintage SPU-GE; SUTs - Ortofon 2-15k & Bob's Devices; Phono Stage: Schiit Mani; Digital - Trichord Genesis III CDP + Arcam rBlink; Schiit Multibit DAC.

  4. #64
    Join Date: Jul 2012

    Location: Benson, Oxfordshire

    Posts: 476
    I'm Alex.

    Default

    I think I'll have to take you up on that offer some time in the future, thank you very much Tom.

    Alex

  5. #65
    Join Date: Sep 2009

    Location: west mids, UK

    Posts: 1,685
    I'm Phil.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alcarmichael View Post
    I'm extremely happy with my speakers, or, I was until I read this thread. It's now making me wonder what I'm missing out on.

    Now, are these big Tannoys any good at more modest volumes (I don't live in a detached house) or is that defeating the purpose?
    one reason i bought my smaller tannoys is that i can listen in great detail at low volumes which is sometimes preferred by my wife when she is present . the 10 inch drivers can really fill the room though when they want
    1]bel canto pre 3 vbs /MSB s200 , / Marantz sa8005/ bel canto fm1
    sonos, . tannoy eaton legacy 2]naim supernait 2 rotel 965cd bel canto 3.5vbss and RFC impulse ta`us

  6. #66
    Join Date: Mar 2016

    Location: Barnet, london UK

    Posts: 695
    I'm Adam.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alcarmichael View Post
    I'm extremely happy with my speakers, or, I was until I read this thread. It's now making me wonder what I'm missing out on.

    Now, are these big Tannoys any good at more modest volumes (I don't live in a detached house) or is that defeating the purpose?
    I rarely listen overly loud, most of my music time is late in the evening, when the family sleep and I live in a terrace.
    The sound fills the room even at modest levels.
    "lack of passion is fatal"
    LP12, Kore, Lingo2, Aro, SKale / DV XX2Mk2 / Garrard 401 / SME 3012 J7 Rewired / Ortofon Vintage SPU GE /Shure M3D /
    WAD 300b Power modded, TJ Mesh Plate Valves / David Coe AD Audio 'Satchmo' Pre & Phono / Hashimoto HM-7 SUT / Tannoy 12" MGs in RFC Custom Rutland Cabinets with RFC Custom Crossovers
    Speaker Cables: Duelund DCA16GA Tinned Copper / Rpi3 & Digi + pro / SW1X Audio Design USB-SPdif / SW1X Audio Design DAC 1 Signature / Interconnects: Duelund DCA20GA home brew /
    SW1X Audio Phono SPDIF AERO 6 / David Coe AD Audio Silver USB / Synology NAS Drive / Roon / Tidal HiFi

  7. #67
    Join Date: Jul 2009

    Location: Hampshire, UK

    Posts: 2,060
    I'm Buriedunderaloadofturntables.

    Default

    Hmmm, 500 you say. You might just squeak a pair of Leak 2075s for that with a bit of luck.
    Adam.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567



 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •