+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Technical Cartridge Question

  1. #11
    Join Date: Apr 2012

    Location: London

    Posts: 685
    I'm James.

    Default

    Possibly another thing the manufacturer factors in when stipulating minimum impedance is whether this might be for a head amp like you are using or an SUT. I have nothing to back up what follows being solely an SUT guy but I would be quite surprised if that choice mightn't affect the performance of the cartridge in quite subtle ways across the frequency spectrum and thereby adjust optimal impedance (which is itself a fudge of a figure)? Perhaps the figure given by particular manufacturers is aimed more at one type of setup than another, or maybe its just an average given as a general, hopefully helpful, indicator?

    Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk

  2. #12
    Join Date: Jan 2009

    Location: Essex

    Posts: 31,966
    I'm openingabottleofwine.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RothwellAudio View Post
    Another possibility is that lower load impedances draw more current from the cartridge and that current flowing through the coils produces a back EMF which damps the motion of the coils. It's the same principle as a power amp with a low output impedance damping the coils of a loudspeaker. However, once again the maths doesn't prove this theory entirely convincingly because the damping effect of the stylus suspension swamps the effect of the current in the coils.
    So who knows?
    Slightly off topic, but when experimenting with the electrical loading of Decca moving iron cartridges, I found that heavily loading the cartridge (i.e. low values of load resistance) affected the tracking ability. I put this down to increased electro-dynamic damping of the cartridge.



    Back on topic, I agree that the x10 rule is only a rough guide, but I have found that using values greater than 10 times the coil resistance can sometimes offer sonic improvement, whereas using values less than 10 times causes the cartridge to sound "closed in" (for want of a better description). For example, this is what I have found for the cartridges in my collection:

    Denon 103 (coil resistance 40R) - load impedance 470R

    Ortofon SPUs (coil resistance usually < 10R) - load impedance 100R

    EMTs (coil resistance 24R) - load impedance 600 - 800R

    Van den Hul MC-1 (based on a Benz generator, coil resistance 13R) - load impedance 220R.

    Just as it is worthwhile experimenting with VTF and VTA and bias settings, I believe it can also be fruitful to experiment with values of load impedance. Sometimes it is best to just enjoy the results of optimisation by ear, rather than worry about any technical explanation.
    Barry

  3. #13
    Join Date: Feb 2016

    Location: Melksham, Wiltshire

    Posts: 732
    I'm Peter.

    Default

    I’m sort of getting this concept..... forgive me, but just listened to Tubular Bells (once at 220 Ohms) base heavy...mids a bit muddled, high frequencies truncated.

    Then back to 100 Ohms ... all is back to normal. Perfect.!!!

    More Ohms (higher than recommended) diminishes the top end... I.e more bass but less top end.

    I guess a lower loading would cause high frequency distortion, you will know soon enough.

    It’s a weird world this hi-fi stuff....... you would think I would know better at my age, after some 50 years with this kit.

    I’m convinced now, that to take the manufacturers guide, and then adjust either side to see what suits.

    I think when a loading says >100 Ohms, try that first, then maybe 220 Ohms (use your ears) Bass or top end.... your choice.

    Thank you all, we live and learn,!,!,!

    Especially “Andrew” - Rothwell Audio” (another learning curve)

    Peter


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  4. #14
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Norwich

    Posts: 1,064
    I'm Mike.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boyse6748 View Post
    So....



    1. My main cartridge (Benz Wood SL) output impedance of 12 Ohms, this times ten = 120 Ohms. I don’t have a 120 Ohm setting on the Whest, so it’s either 100 or 220 Ohms. (Gain is not an issue, I understand that bit). So why does it sound better at 220 Ohms when on paper, that’s more than is required.!!!

    2. My Second cartridge is the (Denon 103 Pro) output impedance of 38 Ohms. This times 10 = 380 Ohms. Again there is no setting for 380 ohms, so it’s either 220 Ohms or 470 Ohms. But to my ears, sounds better at 220 Ohms, Which it exactly the opposite scenario of the Benz. Again, on paper, this is Less than required.
    The impedances you state above are the cartridges' INTERNAL impedance. My Transfig is a very low 1 ohm, my Koetsu 5 and previous Benz 12; one or two other highish end cart's are 30 to 40 ohmsbut generally they run between 4 and 15 ohms.

    As I had a Benz Ebony with my Superline, I can tell you that it sang at 220R but sounded lacklustre on the 100R plug. My Urushi, conversely, does the exact reverse. You tune by ear, making 100R your starting point and go up. Lyras, and I think DVs, prefer 400 to 500 ohms exterior loading on s/s stages.

    I think you'll find, at 220R, dynamics improving, with a fine balance of bass and mid/treble. There's absolutely no harm in experimentation. If you use capacitance plugs/switches, these are far, far less important with m/coil cart's (but useful if you have RFI), but again, if you stray too far above 1 nanofarad, the s.q. may exhibit a 'sat upon' sound, losing dynamics.

    I'd be interested to know what you have in mind for a step up the cart. ladder. After Benz, I'd imagine that a DV might be a bit neutral, despite having a lot more detail etc. The cart. which followed my Ebony was and is the Transfiguration Proteus, but any Transfig would give a similar presentation of effortless lack of boundaries, difficult to call 'warmish (as Benz) but certainly not crossing the Rubicon into coolish /neutral (as per Lyra). Pls. excuse dodgy adjectives used as a necessary adjunct to describing the wonderful/frustrating world of cartridge transducers.

    Be careful, when choosing a cart., to try to match the effective mass of the arm to the cart's compliance (flexibility of cantilever, effectively) requirements. E.g., Myajimas are at their best on heavy arms, Koetsus prefer heavier (upper medium mass territory ). Lyra are okay on medium mass (11 + g) and Benz a little heavier.

  5. #15
    Join Date: Feb 2016

    Location: Melksham, Wiltshire

    Posts: 732
    I'm Peter.

    Default

    Mike, at 70+ I’m still on a learning curve.... I’ve been the happiest ever with the Benz (some say, a pipe and slippers cart) but not for me.

    I’ve always hankered for something that might knock me out... like ...... Lara, Koestu, Dynavector .... etc etc.

    But hell, are they some money.....and you can listen first (I mean with your own kit). I’m afraid not!!

    A Vinyl junky.... but getting into Roon with the Mytek Brooklyn Dac.... no settings... just listen.?!!!

    MQA Steaming is just the dogs......... it’s getting better and better.

    Sorry"...............from a vinyl die hard.

    I thank you for your comments.... most instructive

    Peter




    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  6. #16
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Norwich

    Posts: 1,064
    I'm Mike.

    Default

    Peter, i'm in my late seventies, but unlike you, have no interest in or intention to pursue intangible music. Vinyl, CD and radio are my turn-ons. Re. your next cart. (and this occurred to me just after posting the above), why don't you go for the Benz LPS? Absolutely top-notch yet 'affordable' compared to Japanese alternatives. It's quite a heavy cart., so requires a heavier tonearm counterbalance. I disagree about Benz being 'pipe and slippers', though; they're not ! Koetsus are far richer and darker than Benz, e.g. (and generally unaffordable to boot).

  7. #17
    Join Date: Feb 2016

    Location: Melksham, Wiltshire

    Posts: 732
    I'm Peter.

    Default

    Mike, I’m not trying to pursue intangible music. Like you you, vinyl, cd and radio (via my beloved Dynalab Fm) give me the most joy. I am very lucky to have the best TT/ Arm ever made “in my opinion” ... the fabulous Denon DP80/Dynavector 507 MKII ARM. Just trying to get the best cart I can afford. I might well go for the Benz LPS..... A fab cartridge.

    As you must already know, the Dynavector arm can handle any cartridge ever made, regardless of mass. Just trying to take advantage of this wonderful price of kit.

    Roon came to me by a bit of a mistake...but to be able to listen to the “ any” music currently available is quite novel.

    Sorry, not a techie, but love this form of music also.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  8. #18
    RothwellAudio Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry View Post
    Slightly off topic, but when experimenting with the electrical loading of Decca moving iron cartridges, I found that heavily loading the cartridge (i.e. low values of load resistance) affected the tracking ability. I put this down to increased electro-dynamic damping of the cartridge.
    Thanks for that feedback. I've been aware of the theoretical possibility of low load impedances damping the cartridge's motion for a long time but never experienced the effect in practice. Now at least I know someone who has.
    The coil-damping effect of the load impedance is something that's hardly ever mentioned in technical papers, manufacturer's specs or on forums. I think Graham Slee is the only other person I've heard mention it.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •