+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: FS: Proac Response Three (3) in walnut, owned from new - £1100

  1. #11
    Join Date: Jun 2010

    Location: London

    Posts: 200
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    Thanks guys for the helpful comments.
    Neil.

  2. #12
    Join Date: Jan 2013

    Location: Bristol

    Posts: 6,843
    I'm Justin.

    Default

    I'd buy them for a third system but the wife just won't accommodate the idea.

    Used to own some 2.5s. Used to lust after a pair of these.

  3. #13
    Join Date: Jun 2010

    Location: London

    Posts: 200
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    Bump on a cold Friday night. A few enquiries but nothing solid yet.
    Neil.

  4. #14
    Join Date: Jun 2010

    Location: London

    Posts: 200
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    Tuesday bump - Spring is on its way
    Neil.

  5. #15
    Join Date: Jun 2010

    Location: London

    Posts: 200
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    Thursday bump
    Neil.

  6. #16
    Join Date: Mar 2016

    Location: East Sussex

    Posts: 419
    I'm Nat.

    Default

    What are they like in smallish rooms 12 x 14 foot say?

  7. #17
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: gone

    Posts: 11,519
    I'm gone.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Natara View Post
    What are they like in smallish rooms 12 x 14 foot say?
    I suspect that would be fine.
    I had mine in a 12x23 foot room, but there was a dining area at one end so my actual listening space was probably very similar to yours.
    They are quite small speakers in cross-section - about a foot square, iirc,
    .

  8. #18
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Norwich

    Posts: 1,064
    I'm Mike.

    Default

    I only have the brochure for the Response 3 Signature, but I'm pretty sure the dimensions were the same; i.e. 47" h on plinth, 11" wide and 12" deep. However, the pic. shows the port in the front, and I have a vague recollection that the R3 had a port in the back. Could be wrong here, but I imagine it makes a fair old difference to room placement in respect of rear space.

  9. #19
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: gone

    Posts: 11,519
    I'm gone.

    Default

    Check out the photos in the op, the port is on the front!
    But they do need 2 or 3 feet of space behind them to give of their best.
    Last edited by jandl100; 26-01-2018 at 09:53.
    .

  10. #20
    Join Date: Jun 2010

    Location: London

    Posts: 200
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    Thanks Jerry for anwering the question while I was away from the site .
    Confirmed - port is on the front but as Jerry says 2-3 ft space behind gives them better balance.
    Neil.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •