+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: LAT cable statement

  1. #1
    Join Date: Feb 2010

    Location: Central Scotland

    Posts: 253

    Default LAT cable statement

    Just read this and the bit about the mesh coverings etc causing issue with cable was not something I would have though about. As you guys will know my knowledge on the technical side is pretty low so wonder what you folks think.

    A lot of cables including my Ecosse stuff, Sterling Black Mamba, NVA... all have such covering.
    Paul

    Onkyo 875, Monitor Audio RX6 GW,Monitor audio RX centre GW,Monitor Audio BFX rears, REL QUAKE,Arcam CD73t CD ,Russ Andrews Yello mains cabling & PBJ interconnects,Sterling Black Mamba speaker cable.

  2. #2
    Join Date: Apr 2009

    Location: Near Saffron Walden, Essex

    Posts: 7,096
    I'm Dave.

    Default

    I didn't read all of it as my eyes were crossing with boredom and fatigue.. but it appears to be a cable manufacturer's marketing material.

    The first part I read was about hand made cables and poor screening. Well, some of the best cables I've heard have been hand made and are not screened at all. I started to lose interest after that.

    I would suggest that if you are looking for cables, you forget the techno-babble and try any likely looking cables in your system before handing over the readies. Also remember that you don't have to spend a fortune to get a good cable.

  3. #3
    Join Date: Jan 2009

    Location: Essex

    Posts: 32,198
    I'm openingabottleofwine.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hifi_dave View Post
    I didn't read all of it as my eyes were crossing with boredom and fatigue.. but it appears to be a cable manufacturer's marketing material.

    The first part I read was about hand made cables and poor screening. Well, some of the best cables I've heard have been hand made and are not screened at all. I started to lose interest after that.

    I would suggest that if you are looking for cables, you forget the techno-babble and try any likely looking cables in your system before handing over the readies. Also remember that you don't have to spend a fortune to get a good cable.
    Agree with you there Dave.

    Not only is the LAT article factually wrong, it is full of techno-babble! This is a bete noir of mine. That is not to say that cables cannot make a difference, it is just that the most expensive cables (usually absurdly so) have the cost justified by quoting a lot of technical claptrap, much of which has virtually no relevence to audio whatsoever.

    Regards
    Last edited by Barry; 25-02-2010 at 22:45. Reason: typos
    Barry

  4. #4
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Wrexham, North Wales, UK

    Posts: 110,012
    I'm AudioAl'sArbiterForPISHANTO.

    Default

    Hear, hear!

    One of the reasons why the Mark Grants work so well is because they major on simplicity and a complete lack of bullshit, concentrating instead on solid engineering principles, the use of high quality plugs and cable, and sensible construction techniques

    Avoid 'over-complication' in cables wherever possible!

    Marco.
    Main System

    Turntable: Heavily-modified Technics SL-1210MK5G [Mike New bearing/ETP platter/Paul Hynes SR7 PSU & reg mods]. Funk Firm APM Achromat/Nagaoka GL-601 Crystal Record Weight/Isonoe feet & boots/Ortofon RS-212D/Denon DL-103GL in Denon PCL-300 headshell with Funk Firm Houdini/Kondo SL-115 pure-silver cartridge leads.

    Paul Hynes MC head amp/SR5 PSU. Also modded Lentek head amp/Denon AU-310 SUT.

    Other Cartridges: Nippon Columbia (NOS 1987) Denon DL-103. USA-made Shure SC35C with NOS stylus. Goldring G820 with NOS stylus. Shure M55E with NOS stylus.

    CD Player: Audiocom-modified Sony X-777ES/DAS-R1 DAC.

    Tape Deck: Tandberg TCD 310, fully restored and recalibrated as new, by RDE, plus upgraded with heads from the TCD-420a. Also with matching TM4 Norway microphones.

    Preamps: Heavily-modified Croft Charisma-X. LDR Stereo Coffee. Power Amps: Tube Distinctions Copper Amp fitted with Tungsol KT-150s. Quad 306.

    Cables & Sundries: Mark Grant HDX1 interconnects and digital coaxial cable, plus Mark Grant 6mm UP-LCOFC Van Damme speaker cable. MCRU 'Ultimate' mains leads. Lehmann clone headphone amp with vintage Koss PRO-4AAA headphones.

    Tube Distinctions digital noise filter. VPI HW16.5 record cleaning machine.

    Speakers: Tannoy 15MGs in Lockwood cabinets with modified crossovers. 1967 Celestion Ditton 15.


    Protect your HUMAN RIGHTS and REFUSE ANY *MANDATORY* VACCINE FOR COVID-19!

    Also **SAY NO** to unjust 'vaccine passports' or certificates, which are totally incompatible with a FREE society!!!


  5. #5
    Join Date: Feb 2010

    Location: Central Scotland

    Posts: 253

    Default

    I was on the Audio Salon website as they are Glasgow based. I wondered what cables they sold hence the LAT link as they are sole stockists. On reading it (skim more like as it was techno baffle as per usually) that bit about homemade caught my eye. I failed to get how using the webbing to further cover already covered cables would have the effect as described. lets face it once plugged in who moves the cable about anyway.
    Last edited by pwood; 26-02-2010 at 01:38.
    Paul

    Onkyo 875, Monitor Audio RX6 GW,Monitor audio RX centre GW,Monitor Audio BFX rears, REL QUAKE,Arcam CD73t CD ,Russ Andrews Yello mains cabling & PBJ interconnects,Sterling Black Mamba speaker cable.

  6. #6
    Join Date: Dec 2009

    Location: Hadrians Wall

    Posts: 313

    Default

    Sadly, people with more money than brain cells believe the crap people such as LAT spout.

    Paris Hilton probably owns the best sounding Hi-Fi in the world. A midi system wired up with Nordost Odin.

    Have you read the 'A Note of Special Interest' at the bottom of the LAT page?

    Apart from being stuck up their own backside (they believe that they are the sole reason manufacturers have introduced low priced cables, hows that for a God complex!), they say that "these lower priced cables be intentional down-grades in performance. This is because they now have so many models that it is necessary to design their performance to cascade down as does the pricing scale." And leave the reader to draw conclusions.

    The irony they appear to have overlooked is that they themselves offer a range of IC cables from $499/m to $189/m

    My conclusion (after all, they did ask me to draw my own conclusions) is that their 'cheep' cable has been purposely designed to not be as good as their most expensive cable.

    Kris. (Still looking for the perfect Roy Gregory quote)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •