+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 58

Thread: The Abbey Road Studios RIP OFF

  1. #21
    Join Date: Mar 2017

    Location: Liverpool

    Posts: 222
    I'm Sandro.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by forsell View Post
    All reissue records are mastered from digital files unless you buy BN -Jazz from Analogue Productions or Music Matters. In fact what you buy is only a CD pressed in vinyl. People want to get ripped off so the industry produces scams they crave...
    There is no doubt that the Analogue Production or Music Matters are good products
    It does not give me any pleasure to say that the Abbey issue's are rip off as they state that they used original master tapes and quite same effort in to making the best product possible which is not the case
    I was hoping to find decent prints off a more various genere
    There is a company that cut Classical that is pretty good but a £300 a pop for a limited ,just a few hundred each issue, those are out of my reach.

    Abbey could have also used an old mint A1 vinyl record and made a master from that and maybe made a better job of it.
    Still it does not explain why the run off is so large.

  2. #22
    Join Date: Sep 2009

    Location: Bournemouth

    Posts: 4,254
    I'm Dan.

    Default

    I faulty press does not mean they RIP people off have you tried it on another turntable it could be your set up thats making poor use of the recording? I'm guessing the original master tapes were used otherwise why would they state this master cuts are different could be a number of issues with this and not the company...and putting a marker on them is a bit unfair..
    Main System
    Pioneer SA 6300 Amplifier / Wharfedale Dovedale Speakers / Basic Cables
    Vinyl :
    Rega Planar 2 / RB250 / Ortofon OM Super 10 / VDH Oil Bearing Upgrade / Roksan R Mat

    AV Speakers
    Mordaunt Short - CS5

  3. #23
    Join Date: Feb 2013

    Location: W Lothian

    Posts: 42,946
    I'm Grant.

    Default

    The one ive got is a nice press. John Martyn
    Regards,
    Grant ....

    I've said it before and I'll say it again: democracy simply-doesn't-work
    .... ..... ...... ...... ................... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
    OPPO BDP-103D DARBEE - JBE SERIES 3/M55E/EMOTIVA XPS1 - TWIN PRO MONOBLOCK AMPLIFIERS - XIANG SHENG DAC\PRE\HEADPHONE AMP - TWIN AVANTREE OASIS CLASS 1 BLUETOOTHS - AUDIO TECHNICA ATH-MSR7 & OPPO PM-3 PLANAR HEADPHONES - WIN10 JRIVER23, DEEZER HiFi - ECHO DOT - SMSL M6 MINIDAC - RPI/AUDIOPHONICS - FULL RANGE TWIN TELEFUNKEN/Q ACOUSTIC BT3/CANTON SUB - P.INSPIRED MAINS REGENERATED.

  4. #24
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Dunfermline, Scotland, UK

    Posts: 12,348
    I'm inthescottishmafia.

    Default

    Yes I’ve that one too and it’s very good.
    “Music has always been a matter of energy to me, a question of fuel. Sentimental people call it inspiration, but what they really mean is fuel. I have always needed fuel. I am a serious consumer. On some nights I still believe that a car with the gas needle on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio”

    Hunter S Thompson

  5. #25
    Join Date: Jan 2014

    Location: County Durham, England

    Posts: 554
    I'm Malcolm.

    Default

    There's a question here about what to expect from new vinyl - especially reissues. Original stampers will be worn, if they have even been kept. The analogue master tapes may not be in such a good state - they may be too fragile to handle depending on the age of the recording. Using a digital master (not the mastered for CD version) is a very sensible compromise to everyone but the most ardent digiphobes.

    I believe there is more to an LP than the master tape used. The skill and artistry of the cutting (mastering?) engineer in getting the signal into the grooves and the care taken in manufacture are the critical elements - much more so that whether the source is analogue or digital. The quality of the recent (Abbey Road mastered) Sgt. Pepper's is a case in point. This version doesn't exist in analogue as they created new multi-tracks in digital for the new stereo mix. This new digital master was cut at half-speed, and the end result is phenomenal. (Second LP should have had Strawberry Fields and Penny Lane on though!) Sweeping statements and accusations that Abbey Road are ripping people are unhelpful and untrue.

    Technics SL1210 MkII / SME 309 / Timestep PSU / Achromat / Denon DL-304
    Phono stage TBC
    Lossless / MP3 / Tidal > Roon > Raspberry Pi > Meridian Explorer 2
    Marantz UD7007 SACD/Blu-ray/DVD-V/DVD-A
    Toshiba BDX1200 Blu-ray player (Zone A & Region 1)
    Meridian 502 pre-amp for stereo sources
    Stereo power amp TBC
    Yamaha RX-V1067 for centre, surrounds
    B&W 804S stereo, HTM4S centre, CDMSNT surrounds (5.0)
    Sennheiser HD 700 headphones
    Panasonic PT-AT6000 projector

  6. #26
    Join Date: Feb 2010

    Location: Berkshire, UK

    Posts: 2,818
    I'm Tom.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by m10 View Post
    There's a question here about what to expect from new vinyl - especially reissues. Original stampers will be worn, if they have even been kept. The analogue master tapes may not be in such a good state - they may be too fragile to handle depending on the age of the recording. Using a digital master (not the mastered for CD version) is a very sensible compromise to everyone but the most ardent digiphobes.

    I believe there is more to an LP than the master tape used. The skill and artistry of the cutting (mastering?) engineer in getting the signal into the grooves and the care taken in manufacture are the critical elements - much more so that whether the source is analogue or digital. The quality of the recent (Abbey Road mastered) Sgt. Pepper's is a case in point. This version doesn't exist in analogue as they created new multi-tracks in digital for the new stereo mix. This new digital master was cut at half-speed, and the end result is phenomenal. (Second LP should have had Strawberry Fields and Penny Lane on though!) Sweeping statements and accusations that Abbey Road are ripping people are unhelpful and untrue.
    Well said.
    Main: Speakers 'RFC' Tannoy Canterburys / custom crossovers; Amp - Radford STA100; Pre EAR 912; Vinyl: Thorens TD124 MkII + Ikeda IT345-CR1 / Ortofon 309 Limited tonearms; Cartridges Stereo - Miyajima Madake, Ortofon SPU Royal N + Shure M3D Jico stylus; Mono - Miyajimas - Zero 0.7, Premium 1.0 retipped by Ana Mighty Sound bamboo cantilever, Spirit '78' 3.0 conical from Ana, also vintage GE VRII, Shure M44 strapped for mono with several Expert Stylus conicals for different eras of 78s; Phono stage and SUT from EAR 912; Esoteric Sound Re-Equalizer for equalisation of early mono and 78, switchable in from tape loop; Digital: Audio Note CDT2/II transport, heavily modded AN Kit DAC + Mutec MC3+USB.

    Study: Speakers - Tannoy DC6; Amp: Duncan 'Tuberhunter' 200w class D; preamp - Pass DCB1; Vinyl: Garrard 401 with AT1503 tonearm and vintage SPU-GE; SUTs - Ortofon 2-15k & Bob's Devices; Phono Stage: Schiit Mani; Digital - Trichord Genesis III CDP + Arcam rBlink; Schiit Multibit DAC.

  7. #27
    Join Date: Mar 2016

    Location: Barnet, london UK

    Posts: 695
    I'm Adam.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by m10 View Post
    There's a question here about what to expect from new vinyl - especially reissues. Original stampers will be worn, if they have even been kept. The analogue master tapes may not be in such a good state - they may be too fragile to handle depending on the age of the recording. Using a digital master (not the mastered for CD version) is a very sensible compromise to everyone but the most ardent digiphobes.

    I believe there is more to an LP than the master tape used. The skill and artistry of the cutting (mastering?) engineer in getting the signal into the grooves and the care taken in manufacture are the critical elements - much more so that whether the source is analogue or digital. The quality of the recent (Abbey Road mastered) Sgt. Pepper's is a case in point. This version doesn't exist in analogue as they created new multi-tracks in digital for the new stereo mix. This new digital master was cut at half-speed, and the end result is phenomenal. (Second LP should have had Strawberry Fields and Penny Lane on though!) Sweeping statements and accusations that Abbey Road are ripping people are unhelpful and untrue.
    +1 Malcolm.. with Bells on. There has been some ridiculous nonsense written and really out of order accusations on this particular thread.
    "lack of passion is fatal"
    LP12, Kore, Lingo2, Aro, SKale / DV XX2Mk2 / Garrard 401 / SME 3012 J7 Rewired / Ortofon Vintage SPU GE /Shure M3D /
    WAD 300b Power modded, TJ Mesh Plate Valves / David Coe AD Audio 'Satchmo' Pre & Phono / Hashimoto HM-7 SUT / Tannoy 12" MGs in RFC Custom Rutland Cabinets with RFC Custom Crossovers
    Speaker Cables: Duelund DCA16GA Tinned Copper / Rpi3 & Digi + pro / SW1X Audio Design USB-SPdif / SW1X Audio Design DAC 1 Signature / Interconnects: Duelund DCA20GA home brew /
    SW1X Audio Phono SPDIF AERO 6 / David Coe AD Audio Silver USB / Synology NAS Drive / Roon / Tidal HiFi

  8. #28
    Join Date: Mar 2015

    Location: Berlin

    Posts: 50
    I'm George.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bksabath View Post
    There is no doubt that the Analogue Production or Music Matters are good products
    It does not give me any pleasure to say that the Abbey issue's are rip off as they state that they used original master tapes and quite same effort in to making the best product possible which is not the case
    I was hoping to find decent prints off a more various genere
    There is a company that cut Classical that is pretty good but a £300 a pop for a limited ,just a few hundred each issue, those are out of my reach.

    Abbey could have also used an old mint A1 vinyl record and made a master from that and maybe made a better job of it.
    Still it does not explain why the run off is so large.
    Sorry to say, but your statement is based on your EXPECTATIONS as a "customer". From the perspective of music industry the term: "From original master tape" means: digital backs up were made form a tape (which generation master tape by the way, 1.st, 2.nd...? nobody knows) and then those digital files used for mastering purposes.

    Do you remember the early days of CD, when "AAD" and "ADD" -codes were printed on to show the manufacturing process...? For example: "AAD": 1st "A": analogue source (tape) 2nd "A": analogue mastering equipment throughout 3rd "D": digital storage medium (CD)

    As of modern reissues we speak of "ADDA"-system: 1st "A": analogue source (tape) 2nd "D": digital file (back up) made from an analogue source,, so the source for mastering is pure digital 3rd "D": digital mastering studio equipment used 4 th "A": anlalogue storage medium (vinyl)

    That's why all this highly priced reissue rubbish out there is nothing but scam only...

  9. #29
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 19,840
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by montesquieu View Post
    That’s utter nonsense. There’s a VAST difference between a 24 bit digital studio master, which is then used to master an LP that will then be cut, and a collection of 16 bit 44.1 AIF CD files.
    Actually there isn't. The only thing it will have is greater dynamic range and frequencies over 22 KHz that you can't hear. And the extra dynamic range doesn't matter since you are going to lose it in the pressing for vinyl anyway. A lot of digital studio masters are 18/48 at best since that was state of the art 20 years ago. In the case of an analogue master it will not have the frequency response or dynamic range of 16/44,1 because even 3.5 inch tape at 15 ips is not that good. So whether you press your vinyl from the analogue master or a digital copy of it, providing its resolution is over about 14/44.1 it will make no difference to end product.

    Of all the things that can make a recording on a vinyl LP sound good I can't think of anything that makes less difference.
    Martin



    Current Lash Up:

    Sony X505ES CD Player * NVA P90SA passive pre / Krell KSA50S Power amp * JM Lab Electra 926 loudspeakers *



    ''I like to be objective about my subjectivity.''

    - Geoff 'Walpurgis'

  10. #30
    Join Date: Feb 2010

    Location: Berkshire, UK

    Posts: 2,818
    I'm Tom.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Macca View Post
    Actually there isn't. The only thing it will have is greater dynamic range and frequencies over 22 KHz that you can't hear. And the extra dynamic range doesn't matter since you are going to lose it in the pressing for vinyl anyway. A lot of digital studio masters are 18/48 at best since that was state of the art 20 years ago. In the case of an analogue master it will not have the frequency response or dynamic range of 16/44,1 because even 3.5 inch tape at 15 ips is not that good. So whether you master your vinyl from the analogue master or a digital copy of it, providing its resolution is over about 14/44.1 it will make no difference to end product.

    Of all the things that can make a recording on a vinyl LP sound good I can't think of anything that makes less difference.

    **Some** of it will be thrown away but for sure you want it all available for mastering of the LP.

    It's not simply about feeding a CD to a cutting lathe as was being claimed.
    Main: Speakers 'RFC' Tannoy Canterburys / custom crossovers; Amp - Radford STA100; Pre EAR 912; Vinyl: Thorens TD124 MkII + Ikeda IT345-CR1 / Ortofon 309 Limited tonearms; Cartridges Stereo - Miyajima Madake, Ortofon SPU Royal N + Shure M3D Jico stylus; Mono - Miyajimas - Zero 0.7, Premium 1.0 retipped by Ana Mighty Sound bamboo cantilever, Spirit '78' 3.0 conical from Ana, also vintage GE VRII, Shure M44 strapped for mono with several Expert Stylus conicals for different eras of 78s; Phono stage and SUT from EAR 912; Esoteric Sound Re-Equalizer for equalisation of early mono and 78, switchable in from tape loop; Digital: Audio Note CDT2/II transport, heavily modded AN Kit DAC + Mutec MC3+USB.

    Study: Speakers - Tannoy DC6; Amp: Duncan 'Tuberhunter' 200w class D; preamp - Pass DCB1; Vinyl: Garrard 401 with AT1503 tonearm and vintage SPU-GE; SUTs - Ortofon 2-15k & Bob's Devices; Phono Stage: Schiit Mani; Digital - Trichord Genesis III CDP + Arcam rBlink; Schiit Multibit DAC.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast



 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •