+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Why vinyl? - asks Paul McGowan

  1. #1
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: Venice, Italy

    Posts: 2,926
    I'm Neil.

    Default Why vinyl? - asks Paul McGowan

    If the cleanest, lowest distortion, most extended frequency range, and greatest dynamic range capabilities are the goal, why would any of us consider vinyl? We know digital has these parameters in spades.

    Yet, vinyl persists—not because it’s better at any of the aforementioned, but in spite of it.

    And that is because it remains one of the most musically satisfying mediums we have.

    For those that have spent the time, care, and effort to set up a great vinyl playback system, the rewards are many. Sure, it’s technically limited, but so too is a vintage sports car or a lovely Leica camera—both of which have traits not shared by more modern “technically superior” products.

    It’s tempting to conflate metrics proving a specific point with the conclusion we hope to convince others of—I certainly have been guilty of this in the past—but the fact is when we measure sheer musical enjoyment vinyl has to rank right up there.

    As an engineer, I like hard facts. As an audiophile, I just like great music.

    Vinyl, as well as digital, can provide remarkable listening experiences. The trick, at least for me, is to focus not on technical aspects of either, but just the pure listening experience.

    END
    Audiophile News & Music Review – an INDEPENDENT online audio magazine, focusing on 2-channel audio equipment and wonderful music!


  2. #2
    Join Date: Dec 2008

    Location: Lincolnshire, Home by the Sea

    Posts: 3,698
    I'm Shaun.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Neil McCauley View Post
    Sure, it’s technically limited, but so too is a vintage sports car or a lovely Leica camera—both of which have traits not shared by more modern “technically superior” products.
    Oh yes, as a person who has spent years using vintage film cameras and vintage Kawasaki triple motorcycles I so agree with this comment. I do feel though that most modern technology doesn't last because it has no 'soul'. I now ride a Harley softail for that very reason. I am not interested in 'sterile' 'plastic' modernisms. Maybe other people see beyond that...?
    Marantz CD6005 into Audiolab MDAC
    Nottingham Analogue Interspace turntable with Origin Live Onyx tonearm/Denon DL103/Dynavector P75 MkIII phono stage

    Prima Luna Prologue preamp
    Prima Luna Dialogue Premium power amp/EL34

    B&W CM8 S2 loudspeakers

    Atlas Hyper interconnects
    Van Den Hul Teatrack biwired cables

    "Without this gift of rock and roll we'd all be wasting time"

  3. #3
    Join Date: Jan 2009

    Location: Essex

    Posts: 16,283
    I'm openingabottleofwine.

    Default

    When it comes to music, I'm equally at home with either digital (CDs) or analogue (vinyl and FM radio, and very occasionally tape). I'm not partisan and enjoy both; not finding one superior to the other.

    However when it comes to photography, like Shaun, I greatly miss my film cameras (Leicas and Exactas). Modern digital cameras are easier to use, have by comparison far larger store (i.e. not limited to 36 frames of a roll of 35mm film) and if you mess up a shot it can be deleted. The downside is with them I just don't enjoy taking photographs anymore - worse still, I seem to have lost "the eye".
    Have you listened to this month's choice in the Album Club?

    Barry

  4. #4
    Join Date: Mar 2017

    Location: Seaford UK

    Posts: 396
    I'm Dennis.

    Default

    Isn't objectivity sterile by definition?

  5. #5
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: Venice, Italy

    Posts: 2,926
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry View Post
    However when it comes to photography, like Shaun, I greatly miss my film cameras (Leicas and Exactas). Modern digital cameras are easier to use, have by comparison far larger store (i.e. not limited to 36 frames of a roll of 35mm film) and if you mess up a shot it can be deleted. The downside is with them I just don't enjoy taking photographs anymore - worse still, I seem to have lost "the eye".
    Same here. I have returned to my Olympus OM4ti and am about to but a Pentax Spotmatic F for peanuts money.
    Audiophile News & Music Review – an INDEPENDENT online audio magazine, focusing on 2-channel audio equipment and wonderful music!


  6. #6
    Join Date: Apr 2012

    Location: Southall, West London

    Posts: 29,380
    I'm Geoff.

    Default

    Never use my 35mm cameras. Only got a couple of Pentax SLR's & lenses left now.
    Mr. Tact!

    Main system: MMs/ADCs/Low output MC's/One rare Japanese SUT/One scarce British phono stage/various tonearms/hefty Japanese DD TT and hefty Japanese BD TT and small British BD TT. 4 CD players/2 jitter buster/2 DACs/Valve buffer. TVC stepped attenuator or valve pre-amp or solid state pre-amp. Current dumping power-amp or either of two Class A SS power-amp or Class A EL34 valve monos or big Japanese (part Class A) integrated. Big dual concentric speakers/Smaller dual concentric speakers/Two way British compacts and full range speakers, amongst others. And too much more to list!

+ Reply to Thread



 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •