+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Phono pre-amplification options - advice needed

  1. #11
    Join Date: Apr 2009

    Location: Near Saffron Walden, Essex

    Posts: 7,087
    I'm Dave.

    Default

    Phono stage in the Sony is good, so you need to hear any other phono stages in a direct comparison before committing your cash.

  2. #12
    Join Date: Oct 2017

    Location: Ontario, Canada

    Posts: 791
    I'm Svend.

    Default

    Hi Dave -- yes the phono stage in the Sony is quite good. Very clear and transparent....I like it. However, it's the main preamplification section that backs it up that may or may not be so great. About 20 years ago I had it modded to act as a passive device in order to improve the transparency and open up the sound. It worked, but only on a high output source like CD. Now that I'm putting a good analogue front end into the system, I need that oomph back to make the phono stage really work properly.

    So yesterday I got busy with my soldering iron and reversed the mod to the Sony, so now it's back to being an active device. I didn't have a chance to listen as yet, but I will have an extended session tonight, starting with the Sugden in the system, then swapping in the Sony. I will post back here with my impressions.

    When I opened up the Sony yesterday I was rather surprised to see it had already been recapped! (see pic below) I had totally forgotten about that. My good friend Peter Sutcliffe, who is an audio engineer and loudspeaker designer, must have done it at some point before it was converted to a passive device.

    IMG_20171029_142016.jpg

    I've no idea if those caps are of good quality or not. I don't recognize the big S logo.

    In any case, back to your point re. spending money on a separate phono stage, it's not the phono stage in the Sony that was the problem, it was the main preamp section. So if that's not up to snuff, then even a separate phono stage won't sound right, and in fact may be held back by the Sony's line stage.

    I will know by tonight.... I've made quite a few other changes to the system since the Sony was converted from active to passive (all new cabling and CD player mods being the main ones), so who knows - maybe it will surprise me.

    Thanks, and regards,
    Svend

  3. #13
    RothwellAudio Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Svend N View Post
    ...It can get to a reasonable volume, but the attenuator has to go to 11 to get there...not good.
    Why "not good"? If it goes loud enough, what's the problem?

    Quote Originally Posted by Svend N View Post
    Some years ago the preamp was modified to become a passive device for the line stage section, which really lifted a veil from the music, as the saying goes.
    So going from active to passive was an improvement?

    Quote Originally Posted by Svend N View Post
    As a quick trial to see how an active preamp would behave in my system, I swapped out the Sony for my Sugden C28. Immense improvement! The sound was far more dynamic and fluid, fuller and richer, much better soundstage, more immediate presence...
    The Sugden has a CD Direct button which bypasses the active line stage (basically exactly what the Sony was modded to do), so I used this to switch back and forth to compare active to passive -- no comparison. The direct path sounded lightweight, thin and distant, basically exactly like the Sony did.
    So lesson learned -- the Belles power amp and those speakers really need an active preamp to come alive. I suppose a passive amp would sound great in many systems, but not in this one.
    So you want an active preamp because active sounds much better? Why didn't you notice the sound get much worse when you modded the Sony from active to passive?

    Quote Originally Posted by Svend N View Post
    ...it's the main preamplification section that backs it up that may or may not be so great. About 20 years ago I had it modded to act as a passive device in order to improve the transparency and open up the sound. It worked, but only on a high output source like CD. Now that I'm putting a good analogue front end into the system, I need that oomph back to make the phono stage really work properly.
    When a signal comes in to the preamp, how does it "know" whether the signal came from CD or from a phonostage?

    Basically, none of this makes sense to me. My best guess is that you much prefer the music loud rather than quiet. After listening to loud music it's not surprising that the same music played again quietly sounds "lightweight" and "thin". For a given position of the volume control the music is louder with an active preamp, therefore active sounds better - unless you set the volume control for the same SPL each time. I suspect you haven't been setting for the same SPL and therefore have been misled by the active/passive tests.

    That's just a guess.

  4. #14
    Join Date: Sep 2013

    Location: North Island New Zealand

    Posts: 1,757
    I'm Chris.

    Default

    Hi Svend
    The primary purpose of an audio system is to deliver audio with as little added or made artificial. Keep that in mind and your quest
    will be much easier. If active parts add or make audio artificial then you are better without them, but those that preserve audio and
    assist its proper reproduction, you are better with them.


    Cheers / Chris

  5. #15
    Join Date: Oct 2017

    Location: Ontario, Canada

    Posts: 791
    I'm Svend.

    Default

    Chris -- I completely agree with you. The nice thing about the Sugden preamp is that it has that neat little CD Direct button so I can switch back and forth between active and passive. For this preamp at least, I can hear some rather subtle differences, and some not so subtle but significantly better. Which really says something about the Sugden design. In active mode there is no loss of transparency at all, no added warmth or leanness. On the plus side there is slightly more well defined and deeper bass; better imaging; more dynamic pace (more jump, if you will); and a MUCH more rounded, fluid delivery. The passive mode sounds a bit more cohesive tonally, not quite as disjointed; but leaner and less dynamic. Overall I greatly prefer the active mode -- sounds more musical and lively, a fuller and richer sound but still neutral tonally. Wonderful amp! So in response to your last sentence, it's a wholehearted Yes: the active parts of this amp improve the sound rather than take away or mask it.
    Last edited by Svend N; 31-10-2017 at 03:27.

  6. #16
    Join Date: Oct 2017

    Location: Ontario, Canada

    Posts: 791
    I'm Svend.

    Default

    Andrew -- sorry if my posts are confusing. I do tend to be rather long-winded at times, so sometimes it's a challenge to follow my train of thought. To clarify a few points:

    -- The Sony was modded to be passive about 20 years ago. That's a long time past, and all I remember at the time was that in my system, as it was then, the change was for the better. However, I had different speakers, crappy cables throughout, and a stock early '90s CD player as my main source (albeit a decent one).

    -- That was then, this is now, and the only core component that hasn't changed (other than the Sony pre-) is the Belles power amp. The CD player is the same, but it was significantly upgraded with discrete clock board and discrete op amp boards, among other things, so really it's not the same at all (save the transport). So in the present day I am needing more gain for the newly-acquired turntable, which the passive Sony wasn't delivering. That, and I was finding the sound from the CD player through the passive Sony was a bit lean and lacking dynamics.

    With that in mind, enter the Sugden...suddenly the whole system is alive and sounding dynamic, fluid, rich. More presence, immediacy, fills the room with sound. Significantly better than the passive Sony. So this made me curious about how the Sony would sound in today's system if reverted back to active, hence the soldering work yesterday. Unfortunately I haven't had the chance to listen to it at length -- just a few tracks on some CD's -- but so far I like what I hear. It doesn't seem as fluid and rich as the Sugden, but it does sound very, very good. Much better than I remember it from 20+ years ago. Remarkably, it actually does sound very clear and transparent (big surprise!).

    One of the biggest differences I hear with BOTH the now-active Sony and the Sugden, is how dynamic and alive the speakers are at low volume. There's life now where there wasn't much before. Wonderful! I didn't know what I was missing.

    So what's my take-away from all this so far? Based on what I hear from reverting the Sony back to active mode, and when using the Sugden in the system and switching it back and forth from CD Direct (passive) to active, it seems clear that the Belles power amp really sounds better when driven with more gusto from the preamp. It needs more juice on the input -- it's as simple as that. It just seems to have opened up and now really gives it to the speakers. More flowing, effortless quality to the sound.

    I do need more listening time to sort this out, but for now that's how it seems to me.

    Hope that helps clear up some of the muddled thoughts.

    Regards,
    Svend

  7. #17
    RothwellAudio Guest

    Default

    Svend, sorry if you've mentioned this already in the thread and I have overlooked it, but here's something you could try: you could take the output from the Sony's phonostage via the Tape Out sockets and feed that into the Sugden. That way you get to compare the Sony phonostage and Sony linestage with the Sony phonostage and Sugden linestage. Maybe an interesting experiment.

  8. #18
    Join Date: Oct 2017

    Location: Ontario, Canada

    Posts: 791
    I'm Svend.

    Default

    Hi Andrew -- good idea! I hadn't thought of that, and to be honest had totally forgotten about how the tape circuits work in a preamp. I haven't used those since the late '80s I think. I'm looking forward to hearing the phono stages of both amps once I get the Heybrook running and have a good TT to run into them. Should be interesting!

    BTW, I listened to the Sony again last night, for a bit longer this time, and was impressed at how good it really is. I think it's a keeper. Having heard the Sugden in the main system now, it will be hard to take it out again as it does sound very sweet. But the Sony will work very well for the second system. I'm happy I reverted it back to an active amp.

    Regards,
    Svend

  9. #19
    Join Date: Oct 2017

    Location: Ontario, Canada

    Posts: 791
    I'm Svend.

    Default

    An update here... I decided to have the Sony modded to see if I could eke out more performance from it. Here is the result of that: http://theartofsound.net/forum/showt...106#post940106

    Dave, this may be of particular interest to you, since you also own one of these.

    Cheers,
    Svend

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •