having got a taste with the Trent’s I’m after :
Howard II’s
Conway I or II’s
Kendal I or II’s
Richmond I or II (not sure about 3)
Not after tall thin floor standers the big box stand 70’s era stand mounters please.
Thanks
Jake
Location: London
Posts: 7
I'm Jakob.
having got a taste with the Trent’s I’m after :
Howard II’s
Conway I or II’s
Kendal I or II’s
Richmond I or II (not sure about 3)
Not after tall thin floor standers the big box stand 70’s era stand mounters please.
Thanks
Jake
Location: Iberia!
Posts: 538
I'm Felipe.
The Trent is a terrific speaker, still recall the mid-bass breathing through the dust caps... wonderful little monitor, only limited by the limited bass.
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 10
I'm Paul.
I have a pair of Tays that I don't use. They are boxed.
Location: London
Posts: 7
I'm Jakob.
They are indeed but I’m interested to see how they compare to the older Richmond’s and how the larger older relations compare ...
Sorry mate only interested in the original iterations for now ...as these seem to be what everyone who’s a fan raves about .
Jake
Location: London/Durham
Posts: 6,881
I'm Lawrence.
I'll be honest, I've never heard anyone discussed the old big ones. I used to have the early Howard floorstanders and liked them a lot but wondered how the earlier iteration would sound