+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 10 FirstFirst ... 678910 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 93

Thread: Help needed! Where to start with open baffle speakers

  1. #71
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 37,925
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RothwellAudio View Post
    Interesting. Which hi-fi rules do you consider to be bollox? I ask because I agree with Scotty when he says "ye canno' change the laws of physics, captain".
    One for a new thread I think.
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.

  2. #72
    Join Date: Apr 2011

    Location: cheltenham

    Posts: 746
    I'm matt.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arkless Electronics View Post
    That's interesting that there is now a bass unit made specifically for OB use.
    Just had a quick look at the specs and It looks like a cracking driver for open baffle use. Couldn't see a frequency response graph though...

  3. #73
    Join Date: Jul 2017

    Location: Essex

    Posts: 44
    I'm Thiha.

    Default

    Matt - may mate Dave said the same thing as you about the Eminence Alphas...they were boomy and had muddy bass. He also tried Lowthers (I don't know which ones) and some others. Said AE Dipole 15s were the best of the bunch (really, really good). He also said that the drivers in Voxativ speakers are great, but you need to be a millionnaire!

  4. #74
    Join Date: Oct 2012

    Location: NE England

    Posts: 4,173
    I'm Jez.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fatmarley View Post
    Just had a quick look at the specs and It looks like a cracking driver for open baffle use. Couldn't see a frequency response graph though...
    Yeah the big problem is that woofers for OB need pretty specific characteristics and as there is no market for such things beyond a few audiophiles non have been built... until this one it seems.... I would have thought a foam surround would make it better still but there's the old rot problem..
    Arkless Electronics-Engineered to be better. Tel. 01670 530674 (after 1pm)

    Modded Thorens TD150, Audio Technica AT-1005 MkII, Technics EPC-300MC, Arkless Hybrid MC phono stage, Arkless passive pre, Arkless 50WPC Class A SS power amp, (or) Arkless modded Leak Stereo 20, Modded Kef Reference 105/3's
    ReVox PR99, Studer B62, Ferrograph Series 7, Tandberg TCD440, Hitachi FT-5500MkI, also FT-5500MkII
    Digital: Yamaha CDR-HD1500 (Digital Swiss army knife-CD recorder, player, hard drive, DAC and ADC in one), PC files via 24/96 sound card and SPDIF, modded Philips CD850, modded Philips CD104, modded DPA Little Bit DAC. Sennheiser HD580 cans with Arkless Headphone amp.
    Cables- free interconnects that come with CD players, mains leads from B&Q, dead kettles etc, extension leads from Tesco

  5. #75
    Join Date: Jul 2011

    Location: Northamptonshire

    Posts: 1,916
    I'm Peter.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bumpy View Post
    Don't be put off by room restrictions. I have broken all the above guidance in that I fire across the narrow dimension of my room and listen in the near field. Baffles are barely 1m off the rear wall but are angled inwards which I think 'disrupts' the rear reflections reducing cancellations.
    Yes, Chris, but your set-up takes 'near-field' to a whole other level ... probably more accurate to describe your OBs as very large open-back headphones

  6. #76
    Join Date: Apr 2016

    Location: Gravesend and France

    Posts: 1,498
    I'm paul.

    Default

    Has anybody measured the spl from the rear of a driver in open baffle and compared it to the measurement from the front. I suspect it would be less from the rear. A driver pushes air and due to the cone shape must move more air at the front than the rear, the rear is shaped more like an arrow head compared to the front. I ran open baffle bass 2' from the wall with no loss of spl. On the other hand I accidentally wired my zu omen speakers out of phase and lost the bass very noticeably. What seems logical in theory doesn't always work in practice.o
    Bakoon 13r Denon DP80 Stax UA-70 Shure Ultra 500 in a Martin Bastin body with jico stylus, project ds2 digital Rullit aero 8 field coils in tqwt speakers

    Office system, DIY CSS fullrange speakers with aurum cantus G2 ribbons yulong dac Sony STR6055 receiver Jvc QL-A51 direct drive turntable, Leema sub. JVC Z4S cart is in the house

    Garage system another Sony receiver, cassette deck


    System components are subject to change without warning and at the discretion of the owner.

  7. #77
    Join Date: Apr 2011

    Location: cheltenham

    Posts: 746
    I'm matt.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vintage60 View Post
    Matt - may mate Dave said the same thing as you about the Eminence Alphas...they were boomy and had muddy bass. He also tried Lowthers (I don't know which ones) and some others. Said AE Dipole 15s were the best of the bunch (really, really good). He also said that the drivers in Voxativ speakers are great, but you need to be a millionnaire!
    Looks like you've got your woofers sorted then. Just need to decide on mids and tweeters (assuming you want to start with a 3 way)

  8. #78
    Join Date: Apr 2011

    Location: cheltenham

    Posts: 746
    I'm matt.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arkless Electronics View Post
    I would have thought a foam surround would make it better still but there's the old rot problem..
    Foamed rubber Is almost good apparently. Doesn't rot either.

  9. #79
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 37,925
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paulf-2007 View Post
    Has anybody measured the spl from the rear of a driver in open baffle and compared it to the measurement from the front. I suspect it would be less from the rear. A driver pushes air and due to the cone shape must move more air at the front than the rear, the rear is shaped more like an arrow head compared to the front. I ran open baffle bass 2' from the wall with no loss of spl. On the other hand I accidentally wired my zu omen speakers out of phase and lost the bass very noticeably. What seems logical in theory doesn't always work in practice.o
    Isn't there something in physics about an 'equal and opposite reaction'? You lose bass frequencies progressively as the out of phase return wave cancels the forward wave. So you lose bass, not spl. I think it works out that to cancel down to 40 Hz you need a 20' wide baffle. You'll get the harmonics which is why it will subjectively still have bass, but you won't get the fundamentals.
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.

  10. #80
    Join Date: Apr 2011

    Location: cheltenham

    Posts: 746
    I'm matt.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by petrat View Post
    Yes, Chris, but your set-up takes 'near-field' to a whole other level ... probably more accurate to describe your OBs as very large open-back headphones
    I like near-field listening. You get more of the direct sound with less reflections. Reflections really mess up the sound.

    Some old Epos ES11 I had years ago were absolutely bristling with energy when I had them set up near-field (not at all harsh either). Moved them downstairs to the main system (mid to far-field) and they transformed Into dull, boomy, lifeless things.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 10 FirstFirst ... 678910 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •