Location: cheltenham
Posts: 746
I'm matt.
Location: Essex
Posts: 44
I'm Thiha.
Matt - may mate Dave said the same thing as you about the Eminence Alphas...they were boomy and had muddy bass. He also tried Lowthers (I don't know which ones) and some others. Said AE Dipole 15s were the best of the bunch (really, really good). He also said that the drivers in Voxativ speakers are great, but you need to be a millionnaire!
Yeah the big problem is that woofers for OB need pretty specific characteristics and as there is no market for such things beyond a few audiophiles non have been built... until this one it seems.... I would have thought a foam surround would make it better still but there's the old rot problem..
Arkless Electronics-Engineered to be better. Tel. 01670 530674 (after 1pm)
Modded Thorens TD150, Audio Technica AT-1005 MkII, Technics EPC-300MC, Arkless Hybrid MC phono stage, Arkless passive pre, Arkless 50WPC Class A SS power amp, (or) Arkless modded Leak Stereo 20, Modded Kef Reference 105/3's
ReVox PR99, Studer B62, Ferrograph Series 7, Tandberg TCD440, Hitachi FT-5500MkI, also FT-5500MkII
Digital: Yamaha CDR-HD1500 (Digital Swiss army knife-CD recorder, player, hard drive, DAC and ADC in one), PC files via 24/96 sound card and SPDIF, modded Philips CD850, modded Philips CD104, modded DPA Little Bit DAC. Sennheiser HD580 cans with Arkless Headphone amp.
Cables- free interconnects that come with CD players, mains leads from B&Q, dead kettles etc, extension leads from Tesco
Has anybody measured the spl from the rear of a driver in open baffle and compared it to the measurement from the front. I suspect it would be less from the rear. A driver pushes air and due to the cone shape must move more air at the front than the rear, the rear is shaped more like an arrow head compared to the front. I ran open baffle bass 2' from the wall with no loss of spl. On the other hand I accidentally wired my zu omen speakers out of phase and lost the bass very noticeably. What seems logical in theory doesn't always work in practice.o
Bakoon 13r Denon DP80 Stax UA-70 Shure Ultra 500 in a Martin Bastin body with jico stylus, project ds2 digital Rullit aero 8 field coils in tqwt speakers
Office system, DIY CSS fullrange speakers with aurum cantus G2 ribbons yulong dac Sony STR6055 receiver Jvc QL-A51 direct drive turntable, Leema sub. JVC Z4S cart is in the house
Garage system another Sony receiver, cassette deck
System components are subject to change without warning and at the discretion of the owner.
Location: cheltenham
Posts: 746
I'm matt.
Location: cheltenham
Posts: 746
I'm matt.
Isn't there something in physics about an 'equal and opposite reaction'? You lose bass frequencies progressively as the out of phase return wave cancels the forward wave. So you lose bass, not spl. I think it works out that to cancel down to 40 Hz you need a 20' wide baffle. You'll get the harmonics which is why it will subjectively still have bass, but you won't get the fundamentals.
Current Lash Up:
TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.
Location: cheltenham
Posts: 746
I'm matt.
I like near-field listening. You get more of the direct sound with less reflections. Reflections really mess up the sound.
Some old Epos ES11 I had years ago were absolutely bristling with energy when I had them set up near-field (not at all harsh either). Moved them downstairs to the main system (mid to far-field) and they transformed Into dull, boomy, lifeless things.