+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31

Thread: Fancy a cheap passive pre-amp?

  1. #21
    Join Date: Sep 2009

    Location: Derbyshire

    Posts: 7,593
    I'm Josie.

    Default

    Thanks for the quote, Andrew.

    No... It's not. Lol. Mine is made by boffins with a budget bigger than when Mr. Sausage McDoogle said to his wife, "if you can find a bigger sausage than mine you can clear off and start your own sausage factory"



    Sent from my 9001X using Tapatalk

  2. #22
    Join Date: Nov 2015

    Location: Wolverhampton

    Posts: 5,218
    I'm Oliver.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Black Adder View Post
    Thanks for the quote, Andrew.

    No... It's not. Lol. Mine is made by boffins with a budget bigger than when Mr. Sausage McDoogle said to his wife, "if you can find a bigger sausage than mine you can clear off and start your own sausage factory"



    Sent from my 9001X using Tapatalk
    That Rotel is a thing of beauty. If I had the sovereigns it would be in my house. Possibly the most elegant passive pre ive ever seen. #stunner.

    Sent from my EVA-L09 using Tapatalk
    Analogue: Technics SP10 MK2 > Phonomac AT-1010 tonearm > Ortofon Kontrapunkt b > Wizard Jfet MC Valve Phonostage (Telefunken Valves)
    Digital: Firebottle modded Xiang Sheng DAC (Telefunken Valve)
    Amplification: Slagle AVC Passive Preamp & Firebottle Monoblocks (Telefunken Valves)
    Cables: Fisual S-Flex Speaker Cable & SPOTFIRE IC Cables Throughout
    Speakers: Pioneer CS-77A

  3. #23
    Join Date: Sep 2009

    Location: Derbyshire

    Posts: 7,593
    I'm Josie.

    Default

    It certainly is. It's bonkers regarding build quality and sound.

    Sent from my 9001X using Tapatalk

  4. #24
    Join Date: Oct 2016

    Location: Bolton, England

    Posts: 1,140
    I'm Andrew.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arkless Electronics View Post
    I presume the XLR's are not balanced?
    I wondered about that but the pot looks long enough to be a four-ganged jobby, so maybe it is balanced.

  5. #25
    Join Date: Oct 2012

    Location: NE England

    Posts: 4,175
    I'm Jez.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RothwellAudio View Post
    I wondered about that but the pot looks long enough to be a four-ganged jobby, so maybe it is balanced.
    Now had a look at ebay listing and apparently it is balanced for XLR's!

  6. #26
    Join Date: Apr 2017

    Location: Cheshire UK

    Posts: 490
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by walpurgis View Post
    That was the point. And it sounds good!
    Yes no worries and my posts are never really to have a go or one upmanship. Its always good to see products as a cost reference point. I am interested and am on a starter journey with a passive pre. A switch and a pot...a stepped attenuator and who knows where it ends with contactless utopia. At my level Im just happy with a good sound and simple signal path with good components

    I may be missing out on a bargain but am prepared to pay some more. The XLRs are interesting and have made me think.

    Dont worry I get you and I see the cost saving. Maybe I have some irrational bias against cheap Chinese products in the hi fi industry. I have a Chinese brand phone which works well and I know the Chinese can produce some excellent products.

    Little Bear as a name though?.... Come on!
    Last edited by Minstrel SE; 31-05-2017 at 17:40.

  7. #27
    Join Date: Apr 2012

    Location: Southall, West London

    Posts: 34,495
    I'm Geoff.

    Default

    I've had a good few passives including stepped attenuator types and apart from my TVC unit this seems as good sounding as any.

  8. #28
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Forest of Dean, Glos

    Posts: 9,868
    I'm Jerry.

    Default

    Little Bear make/market some good, cheap, high value gear - I have a little phonostage of their's - something like 35 new - and it's really pretty darn good!

    Not sure what is odd about the name Little Bear - but then I'm sweet and innocent like that.
    Jerry

    Qobuz Hifi / Spotify Premium streaming, SMSL M8 DAC, Schiit Saga passive preamp, Trigon TRE 50 monoblocks, MBL 116F.

    Cables: Wireworld Starlight USB, Ixos Ixotica i/c, W&M speaker cables, Belden 19364 mains cables

  9. #29
    Join Date: Feb 2013

    Location: W Lothian

    Posts: 43,991
    I'm Grant.

    Default

    Ursa Minor to us
    Regards,
    Grant ....

    I've said it before and I'll say it again: democracy simply-doesn't-work
    .... ..... ...... ...... ................... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
    OPPO BDP-103D DARBEE - JBE SERIES 3/M55E/EMOTIVA XPS1 - TWIN PRO MONOBLOCK AMPLIFIERS - XIANG SHENG DAC\PRE\HEADPHONE AMP - TWIN AVANTREE OASIS CLASS 1 BLUETOOTHS - AUDIO TECHNICA ATH-MSR7 & OPPO PM-3 PLANAR HEADPHONES - WIN10 JRIVER24, DEEZER HiFi - SMSL M6 MINIDAC - RPI/AUDIOPHONICS - FULL RANGE TWIN TELEFUNKEN/Q ACOUSTIC BT3/CANTON SUB - P.INSPIRED MAINS REGENERATED.

  10. #30
    Join Date: Oct 2012

    Location: NE England

    Posts: 4,175
    I'm Jez.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by walpurgis View Post
    I've had a good few passives including stepped attenuator types and apart from my TVC unit this seems as good sounding as any.
    Other than reliability and channel matching issues indeed I would expect this to sound very similar to a 1K passive. A passive pre is a passive pre and there's nowt to get wrong.... I would expect all passive pre's to sound very similar regardless of price. Not identical mind... more money generally does get you some greater transparency, mainly by going from a standard vol control to a stepped attenuator, but it will be slight.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast



 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •